Efficacy of a Partially Hydrolyzed Formula, Containing Lactobacillus Reuteri, for Infant Colic
NCT ID: NCT02813772
Last Updated: 2016-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2016-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Milk Formula Supplemented With L. Reuteri on Crying Time in Colicky Infants Less Than 3 Months Old
NCT02430831
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of New Infant Formula in Infantile Colic
NCT01721850
Efficacy of Matricariae Chamomilla L., Melissa Officinalis L. and Tyndallized Lactobacillus Acidophilus (H122) for Infantile Colics
NCT02708238
Impact of Probiotic Preparation VSL#3 on Infants Colics
NCT01869426
An Infant Formula Trial on Dietary Management of Infantile Colic
NCT03329222
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Epidemiology IC is responsible of 25% of pediatric consultation in the first 3-4 months of life affecting from 5% to 30% of infants between 2 weeks and 3 months of life. The variability in the prevalence of IC reported by the several studies depends on different criteria used to define IC.
In a systematic review of 15 community-based surveys on IC prevalence, carried out in 2001, the occurrence rates in the first 3 months of life were from 3% to 28% in prospective studies and from 8% and 40% in retrospective studies. In a prospective study found that 20.5% of 2879 Italian infants, aged 2 weeks-6 months, had IC.
Recently a French study reported a prevalence of IC in infants aged 0-4 months, of 19%. In two english studies, IC was reported in 18.3% and 26 % respectively, of infants aged 0-12 months. Other European studies were conducted with a different reported prevalence.
Outside Europe, a prevalence of 9.2% and of 20% respectively were reported by two studies carried out in US. More recently in an Israeli study of 94 mothers of 2-4 moths of life infants, 56% of those whose babies were breastfed and 73% of those using formula reported "paroxysmal irritability".
In addition, several studies found occurrence rates of crying/fussing problems in young infants ranging from 7% to 19%, without defining the problems as IC.
Pathogenesis The etiology of IC remains still unclear. Gender, type of milk (breast-milk or formula), delivery modality (vaginally or caesarean), mother age, number of siblings and gestational history do not seem to be correlated to IC onset. Gastrointestinal function, psychosocial, and neurodevelopmental disorders, food intolerance, transient low lactase activity, cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and intestinal microbiota imbalance have been suggested as the cause of colic.
Gastrointestinal theories include increased intra-abdominal gas, hyperperistalsis and visceral pain. Gastrointestinal disorders have been implicated in colic because of the infant's leg position and grimacing during the crying episodes. Excessive crying or increased gas production from colon function can result in intraluminal gas formation and aerophagia, even if radiographic images taken during a crying episode have shown a normal gastric outline. One study has suggested that infants with colic may have increased fecal calprotectin levels, suggesting a possible role for gut inflammation; however, another study suggested no differences in fecal calprotectin levels between infants with and infants without colic. Gut hormones, such as motilin, also may play a causative role in colic. Motilin is thought to cause hyperperistalsis, leading to abdominal pain and colic. Regarding psychosocial hypotheses, maternal anxiety and depression, and difficult infant temperament have been correlated to IC. Also behavioral issues such as family tension or inadequate interaction between parents and infant have been considered, but these issues are really controversial. Concomitant risk factors remain partially unknown; however, maternal smoking, increased maternal age and firstborn status may be associated to the development of IC.
The role of intestinal microbiome in Infantile Colic Recently, the composition of intestinal microbiome has been addressed as an independent risk factor for IC. Several studies indicate that inadequate lactobacilli in the first few months of life may affect intestinal fatty acid profile favoring the development of IC. Coliform bacteria have also been found more abundantly in colicky infants and it is speculated that altering the intestinal microbiota composition may positively influence the management of affected infants. As a matter of fact, recently, research into the use of probiotics for colic has been rapidly increasing but results are conflicting. Infants with colic are reported to have increased concentration of gas forming organisms and proteobacteria such as Escherichia coli in their gut. Colonization with certain intestinal microorganisms, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species, along with increased intestinal microbial diversity, may protect against infant distress. Probiotics enhance the mucosal barrier and promote microbial diversity in the gut. They may reduce concentrations of proteobacteria and gas forming coliform and reduce intestinal inflammation.
One clinical trial showed safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri in prevention of IC. A recent meta-analysis of three small, randomized controlled trials, of breast-fed infants with IC reported that Lactobacillus reuteri noticeably reduced crying time at 21 days post supplementation. Recently Chau et al showed that administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 significantly improved colic symptoms by reducing crying and fussing times in breastfed Canadian infants with colic. In contrast, a double blind, placebo controlled randomized trial on the same probiotic strain Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 showed that it did not benefit a community sample of breast-fed infants and formula-fed infants with IC.
The role of diet in Infant colic There are no uniform criteria for a specific therapeutic approach of IC. Regarding dietary modifications on management of IC, current evidence suggests that they may reduce IC in only a very small minority of infants. Unfortunately, the evidence is often contrasting. For the breast-fed infants with IC, where there is the relatively rare concern of a cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), one can consider eliminating cow's milk from the maternal diet for a minimum of two weeks. For the formula-fed infants with colic, the use of a time-limited (two weeks) empiric trial of an extensively hydrolyzed formula may be considered. However this information derived from studies in highly selected patients from tertiary care level centers. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a partial hydrolyzed, with high β-palmitate, and a specific prebiotics mixture with galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides resulted in a significant decrease of colic within one week of intervention. In some cases, these formulas are lactose-reduced or lactose-free and contain prebiotics or probiotics causing a reduction in the number of crying episodes per week and total crying time. Infante et al showed an association between clinical improvement and evidence of decreased levels of hydrogen in IC when the infants were fed with a specially designed, low-lactose formula. Moreover, in two double-blinded crossover trials, lactase treatment reduced crying time compared with placebo. The use of soy formulas, instead, in the treatment of IC should be avoided since it can induce sensitization to soy and it's high in isoflavones with estradiol-like effects.
OBJECTIVES
Primary objective:
-To determine whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Secondary objectives:
* To evaluate the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri in prolonging the duration of sleeping period.
* To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on fecal microbiome of colicky infants
* To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on parents' quality of life
* To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on infants' quality of life
METHODS
Study design
* This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized-controlled, clinical trial.
* The study aims to compare the infant colic's trend and intestinal microbiome between infants fed with partially hydrolyzed formulas (pHF; 100% whey protein; 1.9g/100 kcal) with reduced lactose content (40%), addition of maltodextrins (60%) and Lactobacillus reuteri (NAN Sensitive, Nestlè) (group 1) and infants fed with an intact protein body formula (70% of whey protein, 30% of casein; 1.85g/100 kcal) with 100% of lactose content and not containing Lactobacillus reuteri (NAN Optipro 1, Nestlè) (group 2).
* Subjects will be enrolled consecutively and randomized to one of the 2 study groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group 1
Patients with infantile colics who will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestlè
Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle
Infants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks.
group 2
Patients with infantile colics who will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestlè
Milk formula Optipro, Nestle
Infants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle
Infants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks.
Milk formula Optipro, Nestle
Infants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1 Day
4 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federico II University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Annamaria Staiano
Professor of Pediatrics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Annamaria Staiano
Naples, Italy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Turco R, Russo M, Bruzzese D, Staiano A. Efficacy of a partially hydrolysed formula, with reduced lactose content and with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infant colic: A double blind, randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2021 Feb;40(2):412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30/05/2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.