DOSE HPV: Development of Systems and Education to Improve HPV Vaccination Rates

NCT ID: NCT02812732

Last Updated: 2020-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

382 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After completing over 600 interviews with parents, adolescents, and clinicians to determine reasons why HPV vaccines are used or not used, the investigators recently piloted a communication-based educational intervention with healthcare clinicians to improve communication around HPV vaccination. The intervention combined education and quality improvement methods using a mechanism called Performance Improvement Continuing Medical Education. This type of intervention is attractive to clinicians because they improve their cancer prevention practices while fulfilling requirements for maintaining board certification. The intervention consists of seven education and feedback sessions along with baseline and follow-up chart reviews and facilitated group discussions of clinician and practice vaccination rates. The pilot intervention was effective: at the two pilot intervention sites, girls were 60% and boys were 15 times more likely to receive HPV vaccination than at control sites both during and after the intervention period.

The goal of the proposed research is to broadly test the intervention's effectiveness in a diverse group of pediatric and family medicine practices serving low-income and minority patients. First, the investigators will perform a randomized trial in five community health centers to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. Second, the investigators will examine what made the intervention successful and identify barriers to sustainability with the goal of ensuring that the intervention can be successfully replicated in other settings. Third, the investigators will explore the effects of the intervention on parent-clinician communication by surveying parents and clinicians and observing clinical encounters when vaccination is discussed.

The proposed intervention represents an innovative and scalable model for promoting cancer prevention and screening activities by clinicians. Unlike programs that increase administrative burdens on busy clinicians, the proposed intervention allows clinicians to improve cancer prevention practices while simultaneously fulfilling requirements to maintain their board certification and improving the quality of cancer prevention care. It therefore has great potential for widespread dissemination.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, and oral cancers, which disproportionately affect low-income and minority populations. Universal HPV vaccination has the potential to decrease burdens and to reduce disparities in these diseases. However, HPV vaccination rates for U.S. adolescents remain low. Clinician recommendation is the most important factor influencing HPV vaccine uptake; thus enhancing clinician communication about HPV vaccines is a critically important target for interventions to prevent cancer.

OBJECTIVE

In the past six years, the investigators' research has identified factors affecting HPV vaccine communication and utilization. the investigators recently piloted a communication intervention with clinicians, and at the two pilot intervention sites, girls were 60% and boys were 15 times more likely to receive HPV vaccination than at control sites both during and after the intervention period. The investigators aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of this intervention in a randomized trial, and to directly examine its effects on communication.

SPECIFIC AIMS

Aim 1. To evaluate intervention effectiveness on raising HPV vaccination rates using a stepped wedge randomized trial in federally qualified health centers.

Aim 2: To conduct a process evaluation that examines barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation and intervention sustainability, and to assess intervention fidelity.

Aim 3. To describe specific effects of the intervention on clinician-parent communication about HPV vaccination.

STUDY DESIGN

To address Aim 1, the investigators will perform a stepped wedge randomized trial in five community health centers to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. The intervention consists of a seven session Performance Improvement Continuing Medical Education (PI CME) program that employs HPV education and training in motivational interviewing to improve clinicians' HPV vaccine communication, and allows clinicians to improve the quality of vaccine care while fulfilling board certification requirements. To address Aim 2, the investigators will individually interview a selected group of providers and clinical leaders using the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) model of process evaluation, and will analyze audio recordings of clinical interactions to measure intervention fidelity. Aim 3, an exploration of the intervention's effects on parent-clinician communication, will be conducted by surveying parents and clinicians and observing clinical encounters.

CANCER RELEVANCE

Rates of HPV related cancers have been increasing, but vaccination rates have remained stagnant since 2011. Recognizing the potential impact of HPV vaccination, the President's Cancer Panel stated in 2014 that raising HPV vaccination rates was a national priority. The proposed intervention represents an innovative and scalable model for promoting cancer prevention and screening activities by clinicians.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Providers at each clinic will receive the intervention (DOSE HPV) on a rolling basis. Vaccination rates will be compared pre- and post-intervention at each clinic, and changes in rates will be compared across clinics.

Group Type OTHER

DOSE HPV

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The primary goals of the DOSE HPV intervention are to 1) change clinician HPV vaccine recommendations and responses to hesitant parents, and 2) support systems changes to improve the vaccination process. The first four sessions follow a standardized curriculum, while the last three sessions include development and implementation of tailored activities designed to meet individual practice needs.

Sessions 1 and 2 generate motivation for the project through feedback of vaccination rates (Session 1) and education on HPV disease (Session 2). Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI) skills are taught in Sessions 3\&4. Action Plans are developed in Session 5. Sessions 6\&7, which follow a standard quality improvement format: plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DOSE HPV

The primary goals of the DOSE HPV intervention are to 1) change clinician HPV vaccine recommendations and responses to hesitant parents, and 2) support systems changes to improve the vaccination process. The first four sessions follow a standardized curriculum, while the last three sessions include development and implementation of tailored activities designed to meet individual practice needs.

Sessions 1 and 2 generate motivation for the project through feedback of vaccination rates (Session 1) and education on HPV disease (Session 2). Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI) skills are taught in Sessions 3\&4. Action Plans are developed in Session 5. Sessions 6\&7, which follow a standard quality improvement format: plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Receive primary care at intervention sites
* ages 9-26

Exclusion Criteria

* do not receive primary care
* outside age range
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

26 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

American Cancer Society, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rebecca Perkins

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rebecca Perkins, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Boston Medical Center/ Boston University School of Medicine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perkins RB, Zisblatt L, Legler A, Trucks E, Hanchate A, Gorin SS. Effectiveness of a provider-focused intervention to improve HPV vaccination rates in boys and girls. Vaccine. 2015 Feb 25;33(9):1223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25448095 (View on PubMed)

Casey SM, Jansen E, Drainoni ML, Schuch TJ, Leschly KS, Perkins RB. Long-Term Multilevel Intervention Impact on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates Spanning the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2022 Jan 1;26(1):13-19. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000648.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34928249 (View on PubMed)

Perkins RB, Legler A, Jansen E, Bernstein J, Pierre-Joseph N, Eun TJ, Biancarelli DL, Schuch TJ, Leschly K, Fenton ATHR, Adams WG, Clark JA, Drainoni ML, Hanchate A. Improving HPV Vaccination Rates: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2020 Jul;146(1):e20192737. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2737. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32540986 (View on PubMed)

Perkins RB, Banigbe B, Fenton AT, O'Grady AK, Jansen EM, Bernstein JL, Joseph NP, Eun TJ, Biancarelli DL, Drainoni ML. Effect of a multi-component intervention on providers' HPV vaccine communication. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2736-2743. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1747923. Epub 2020 May 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32401592 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-34561

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The STOP-HPV Scale Up Study
NCT06831383 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA