Multilevel Interventions to Enhance Provider Recommendations for HPV Vaccination

NCT ID: NCT03501992

Last Updated: 2024-10-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9242 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Each year the human papillomavirus (HPV) causes 30,000 cancers in the United States despite the availability of very effective and safe vaccines. Uptake of the HPV vaccine has been disappointingly low and lags behind other adolescent vaccines. This study seeks to test interventions targeting health care system, provider, and patient factors to improve the population uptake of the HPV vaccine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The broad, long-term objective is to substantially increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates by deploying effective population-health interventions in clinical practices across the United States. As part of this effort, the investigators intend to evaluate two evidence-based interventions with innovative enhancements at six Mayo Clinic primary care practices (PCP) to evaluate their individual and combined impact on rates of HPV vaccination among female and male patients. Aim 1, "Less Pain, Less Fuss, Right Now!", will test the hypothesis that, as compared to no intervention (current practice), a practice-level intervention utilizing reminder-recalls featuring the availability of non-medication and medication anesthetics, the convenience of nurse-only visits, and the use of persuasive language for early, on-time vaccinations will improve HPV vaccine delivery rates. Aim 2, "Make It Count!", will test the hypothesis that, as compared to no intervention, a provider level intervention utilizing a missed-opportunities assessment and feedback intervention applying social pressure (specific peer-performance comparisons) and equipping providers with a strong-recommendation toolkit will improve HPV vaccine delivery rates. Aim 3 will test the hypothesis that simultaneous implementation of interventions targeting individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors will have a synergistic effect on HPV vaccine delivery rates. To accomplish Aims 1-3, the investigators will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with an integrated process evaluation. The cluster approach prevents cross-contamination between patients or providers as we allocate two separate interventions (Aims 1 and 2) in the six PCPs. The stepped-wedge design, which ensures all practices eventually receive the same set of interventions, permits the single institutional review board overseeing all six PCPs to approve the study without requiring recruitment and consent of individual patients or providers. The stepped-wedge approach also permits the investigators to test the presence of each of the interventions in each PCP, making trial participation more attractive, while also allowing each practice to serve as its own control, reducing the bias due to imbalanced risk factors across practices. The factorial design allows the investigators to use a single trial to test two interventions and assess each individually and in combination. The design also conserves sample size while maintaining power. The investigators will measure the impact separately in females and males, 11-12 years of age for the rates of receipt of HPV vaccine doses due. Rigorously tested, highly effective, population-level interventions are essential if the US is to reach the Healthy People 2020 goal for HPV vaccination. The rigor, design, and high likelihood of success of this study will provide key evidence regarding practice- and provider-level interventions to improve HPV vaccination rates. Mayo Clinic's best practices inform not only its own 70 practices across five states but its Mayo Clinic Care Network, which consists of nearly 40 health-care organizations across 26 states and Puerto Rico.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Papillomavirus Vaccines

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

A factorial, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with process evaluation
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The data analyst will conduct the measurement of the patients eligible and vaccinated and the calculations of the outcomes. The investigators will blind the data analyst to which intervention(s) each practice was assigned to receive. However that only masks the practices' interventions for Step 2 and Step 3 as all practices receive the same interventions in Step 1 (current care) and Step 4 (combined reminder-audit).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Practice A

Practice A will consist of the eligible patients empaneled to one of the six participating practices. In the first step, Practice A will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. in the second step, Practice A will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the third step, Practice A will receive the reminder-recall intervention. In the fourth step, Practice A will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Current care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Reminder-recall

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The communication will use expectant (announcement-style or presumptive) language noting the child's HPV vaccination status and stating that the child's provider strongly recommends the child receive the HPV vaccination now. The communication will also describe availability of topical anesthetics (less pain), indicate the availability and convenience of nurse visits for HPV vaccination (less fuss), and describe the immunological and logistical benefits of early vaccination (right now).

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Practice B

Practice B will consist of the eligible patients empaneled to one of the six participating practices. In the first step, Practice B will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the second step, Practice B will be assigned to receive the reminder-recall intervention. In the third step, Practice B will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention. In the fourth step, Practice A will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Current care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Reminder-recall

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The communication will use expectant (announcement-style or presumptive) language noting the child's HPV vaccination status and stating that the child's provider strongly recommends the child receive the HPV vaccination now. The communication will also describe availability of topical anesthetics (less pain), indicate the availability and convenience of nurse visits for HPV vaccination (less fuss), and describe the immunological and logistical benefits of early vaccination (right now).

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Practice C

Practice C will consist of the eligible patients empaneled to one of the six participating practices. In the first step, Practice C will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the second step, Practice C will be assigned to receive the audit-and-feedback intervention. In the third step, Practice C will receive the audit-and-feedback intervention. In the fourth step, Practice C will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Current care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention includes two components. The first is a missed opportunities audit-and-feedback. The second is a provision of a strong recommendation provider-toolkit, along with a broad education of the practice staff-nurses, medical secretaries, receptionists, and clinical assistants-regarding the nature of the intervention, its goals, and its likely impact on the practice. The broad education will be conducted through supervisory communications only to practice staff in practices allocated to the intervention at the beginning of the step.

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Practice D

Practice D will consist of the eligible patients empaneled to one of the six participating practices. In the first step, Practice D will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the second step, Practice D will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the third step, Practice D will receive the audit-and-feedback intervention. In the fourth step, Practice D will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Current care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention includes two components. The first is a missed opportunities audit-and-feedback. The second is a provision of a strong recommendation provider-toolkit, along with a broad education of the practice staff-nurses, medical secretaries, receptionists, and clinical assistants-regarding the nature of the intervention, its goals, and its likely impact on the practice. The broad education will be conducted through supervisory communications only to practice staff in practices allocated to the intervention at the beginning of the step.

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Practice E

Practice E will consist of the eligible patients empaneled to one of the six participating practices. In the first step, Practice E will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the second step, Practice E will be assigned to receive the reminder-recall intervention. In the third step, Practice E will receive the reminder-recall intervention. In the fourth step, Practice E will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Current care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Reminder-recall

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The communication will use expectant (announcement-style or presumptive) language noting the child's HPV vaccination status and stating that the child's provider strongly recommends the child receive the HPV vaccination now. The communication will also describe availability of topical anesthetics (less pain), indicate the availability and convenience of nurse visits for HPV vaccination (less fuss), and describe the immunological and logistical benefits of early vaccination (right now).

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Practice F

Practice F will consist of the eligible patients empaneled to one of the six participating practices. In the first step, Practice F will be assigned to receive the current care intervention. In the second step, Practice F will be assigned to receive the audit-and-feedback intervention. In the third step, Practice F will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention. In the fourth step, Practice F will receive the combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Current care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention includes two components. The first is a missed opportunities audit-and-feedback. The second is a provision of a strong recommendation provider-toolkit, along with a broad education of the practice staff-nurses, medical secretaries, receptionists, and clinical assistants-regarding the nature of the intervention, its goals, and its likely impact on the practice. The broad education will be conducted through supervisory communications only to practice staff in practices allocated to the intervention at the beginning of the step.

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Current care

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Reminder-recall

The communication will use expectant (announcement-style or presumptive) language noting the child's HPV vaccination status and stating that the child's provider strongly recommends the child receive the HPV vaccination now. The communication will also describe availability of topical anesthetics (less pain), indicate the availability and convenience of nurse visits for HPV vaccination (less fuss), and describe the immunological and logistical benefits of early vaccination (right now).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Audit-and-feedback

The intervention includes two components. The first is a missed opportunities audit-and-feedback. The second is a provision of a strong recommendation provider-toolkit, along with a broad education of the practice staff-nurses, medical secretaries, receptionists, and clinical assistants-regarding the nature of the intervention, its goals, and its likely impact on the practice. The broad education will be conducted through supervisory communications only to practice staff in practices allocated to the intervention at the beginning of the step.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Combined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Active control, active comparator, current practice "Less Pain, Less Fuss, Right Now!" reminder-recall "Make It Count!" audit-and-feedback & provider toolkit "Less Pain, Less Fuss, Right Now!" and "Make It Count!"

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Empaneled in one of the six participating primary care practices
* 11 to 12 years of age at the first day of each of the 12-month-long steps
* Due during that 12-month-long step for at least one dose of the HPV vaccine

Exclusion Criteria

* Not empaneled in one of the six participating practices
* Empaneled in one of the six participating practices but less than 11 years of age or more than 12 years of age on the first day of each 12 month long step
* Not due during that 12-month-long step for a dose of HPV vaccine.
Minimum Eligible Age

11 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert M. Jacobson

Professor of Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert M Jacobson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Joan M Griffin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Finney Rutten LJ, Griffin JM, St Sauver JL, MacLaughlin K, Austin JD, Jenkins G, Herrin J, Jacobson RM. Multilevel Implementation Strategies for Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;178(1):29-36. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4932.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37983062 (View on PubMed)

Kong WY, Finney Rutten LJ, Herrin J, St Sauver JL, Jenkins GD, Griffin JM, Jacobson RM. Multilevel Intervention and Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Disparities: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2518895. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18895.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40622715 (View on PubMed)

Finney Rutten LJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, St Sauver JL, Croghan IT, Jacobson DJ, Wilson PM, Herrin J, Jacobson RM. Evaluating the impact of multilevel evidence-based implementation strategies to enhance provider recommendation on human papillomavirus vaccination rates among an empaneled primary care patient population: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 13;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0778-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30001723 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01CA217889

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

17-010661

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.