The STOP-HPV Scale Up Study

NCT ID: NCT06831383

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes 35,900 US cancer cases per year, 4,000 deaths, and $4 billion in can In this study, the investigators will conduct a 3-arm clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) in an estimated 72 practices from up to 8 health systems to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two potentially scalable implementation strategies (based on prior work) to increase the initiation of HPV vaccine against a usual care (control) arm. The intervention arms are 1) online provider communication training only ("STOP-HPV-Online" and 2) online provider communication training plus a Learning Collaborative, with performance feedback, attended by practice leads ("STOP-HPV-LC).

cer-related costs. It is recommended at ages 11-12 years routinely but can be given starting at ages 9-10 years. Despite having an effective vaccine, HPV vaccine initiation/completion rates in the U.S. were only at 76.8%/61.4% respectively in 2023 among 13-17 year olds; these rates are lower than the other recommended adolescent vaccines. Two key barriers are 1) suboptimal clinician communication to address parental concerns and 2) ineffective office systems causing missed vaccine opportunities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In prior work, the investigators have tested two implementation strategies/interventions that were effective, but which were deployed by the research team. The first is provider communication training ("STOP-HPV-Online"), delivered by the research team, in a cluster RCT in 48 pediatric practices from a research network (6.8% improvement in initiation). The other is a quality improvement, pre-post study, that included both provider communication training, as well as a Learning Collaborative (LC) for practice leads (8% increase in initiation).

A major challenge in implementation science and spreading practice-based strategies is to move from research teams deploying implementation strategies (intervention) to health systems deploying them. In this study, the investigators will compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the two implementation strategies (interventions) using a 3-arm clustered RCT: 1) STOP-HPV-Online vs 2) STOP-HPV-LC vs 3) usual care. The study team will randomize an estimated 72 practices (from up to 8 health systems) to the 1) STOP-HPV-Online arm, 2) the STOP-HPV-LC arm or 3) the control arm, assess fidelity to the intervention and conduct the evaluation. A collaborating organization, AMGA (the American Medical Group Association), will facilitate training of the health system personnel, as needed; however, the health systems will deploy each intervention. The primary outcome measure is the initiation rate among 9-\<13 year olds with a well-child care visit during the 12 month intervention period (with inclusion starting at the time of a well child care visit during the intervention period). A secondary outcome measure will be the initiation rate among 13-17 year olds with a well child care visit during the intervention period (with inclusion starting at the time of a well child care visit during the intervention period. For both measures, inclusion criteria will be: 1) presenting to a participating practice, 2) age eligible at the visit and 3) no prior vaccine at the time of the visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

STOP-HPV Online

Provider communication training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

STOP-HPV-Online

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Approximately one third of practices within a participating health system will be randomized to receiving the STOP-HPV-Online intervention.

STOP-HPV LC

Provider communication training plus Learning Collaborative sessions attended by practice leads and quarterly performance feedback to the practice.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

STOP-HPV-LC

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Approximately one third of practices within a participating health system will be randomized to receiving the STOP-HPV-LC intervention.

Usual Care

Standard of care control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

STOP-HPV-Online

Approximately one third of practices within a participating health system will be randomized to receiving the STOP-HPV-Online intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

STOP-HPV-LC

Approximately one third of practices within a participating health system will be randomized to receiving the STOP-HPV-LC intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient of participating practice
* Well child care visit during the 12-month intervention period
* No prior dose of HPV vaccine at the time of the well child care visit
* Age-eligible

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior dose of HPV vaccine
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Medical Group Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter G Szilagyi, MD MPH

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01CA276151-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

23-000022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The SPOT-HPV Study
NCT05524025 COMPLETED