Ultrasound Estimation of Pleural Effusion in the Sitting Patients
NCT ID: NCT02809872
Last Updated: 2017-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-01-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Performance Evaluation of Clinical Ultrasound in Management of Acute Pulmonary Edema in Elderly Patient
NCT02638350
Lung Ultrasound for Acute Dyspnea in Emergency Department
NCT01287429
Positive and Quantitative Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions by Thoracic Ultrasonography in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Department
NCT03846934
Diaphragmatic Echography in Critically Ill patientS
NCT02696018
Diagnostic Value of Portable Ultrasound for Dyspneic Patient Support in the Emergency Department
NCT01818882
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Strategies for the estimation of PE can be divided into: i) qualitative methods, which are non-invasive; and ii) quantitative methods, which are invasive. Qualitative methods provide coarse estimation of PE (minimal, small, moderate and massive PE), and usually ultrasonography (US) is devoted for this aim; quantitative approaches give accurate information about PE volume, at the expenses of the invasiveness, because of the need of X-ray, CT imaging and thoracentesis.
The interest in the use of US for the evaluation of chest diseases, especially for the study of bedridden, critically ill patients increased. In fact, US-based methods present various advantages: i) absence of ionizing radiation; ii) noninvasiveness; iii) they can be performed at the bedside; iv) being inexpensive, can be repeated if necessary; v) short examination time when compared with CT-based methods. Moreover, US methods are particularly sensitive in imaging the chest wall, pleura, and pleural space thanks to their superficial locations, and are often used to detect PE and guide thoracentesis and drainage, especially in minimal effusions.
Some authors proposed approaches for the estimation of PE volume by means of US images. The PE is identified like an anechoic area on the US image. The basic idea is to measure characteristic lengths or surfaces, and to correlate them to the volume. Such approaches can be distinguished into linear and planar. In the linear ones, usually one length (e.g., the high of the PE column, or intrapleural distance) measured on US image is correlated to the PE volume. These methods are assessed by comparing their output with the values obtained by the gold standard (CT, or thoracentesis). The pro of these techniques related to the quick evaluation is restrained by the low accuracy of the estimation.
In the planar approaches, volumes are directly calculated by multiplying a specific length (e.g., the height of the PE column) with the effusion areas measured in correspondence of defined anatomical landmarks (e.g., the half height of PE column). For instance, the model proposed by Remérand et al. requires three measurements: 2 for the detection of the PE column extremities, and 1 for the area. The US exam is performed on supine patients, at the end-expiration. Such approach is more time-consuming than the linear one, but allows achieving more accurate results.
The present study implements a simple and affordable planar model, based on the product between the height of the PE column and the area of the surface at half PE column. Such landmarks can be easily detected by the clinician during the exam. The model requires only two US measurements, performed on seated patients. Volumes estimated by US images are compared with volumes calculated from the CT scans of the patient (gold standard), acquired within the 24 hours.
Materials and Methods:
Images collection In this retrospective study, US images and CT scans will be collected from patients, hospitalized at the Campus Bio Medico Teaching Hospital in Rome. Thoracic and total body CT scans will be performed for clinical reasons related to patients care. The consent to participate a clinical study will be obtained. The CT scans will be collected within 24 hours from the US exam, in order to avoid significant differences due to spontaneous resorption of PE.
Model development Bedside pleural US imaging will be performed using ECM-EXAGYNE with an abdominal convex 3.5 MHz probe. US exam will be performed with the seating patients and the US measurements will be collected at the end-expiration apnea.
The pleural cavity will be explored on frontal plane to detect the maximal height of PE column (hPEUS). In correspondence of the midline of hPEUS, the probe will be rotated of 90° on transverse plane, and the PE area (aPEUS) will be detected. hPEUS and aPEUS will be manually collected.
Thoracic CT scan CT scan will be performed using Somatom Sensation 64 (Siemens) with tube voltage of 120 kVp, tube current of 460mA and B30f as convolution kernel.
The 3.0 mm-thick contiguous sections of the whole lung will be acquired during a prolonged expiratory pause. CT data will be stored on computerized disks and subsequently analyzed using OsiriX software (v7.0.2).
PE volume will be quantified through a manual delineation of cross-sectional PE area. PEVCT will be computed by the software with the sum of the total number of pixels present in all PE cross-sectional area delineated.
The following analysis will be performed:
1. Assessment of the intra-observer reproducibility on PEVCT
2. Correlation between PE volumes estimated with US and CT
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Group
Study Group with Pleural effusion for any cause and receiving chest CT scan and thoracic Ultrasounds.
Diagnostic Thoracic Ultrasound
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diagnostic Thoracic Ultrasound
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to achieve a sitting position
* Chest CT scan within 24 hours available
* Informed consent available
Exclusion Criteria
* Age under 18
* No recent Chest CT scan available
* Unable to keep the sitting position
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Scarlata, Simone, M.D.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Simone Scarlata, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital
Rome, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Charalampidis C, Youroukou A, Lazaridis G, Baka S, Mpoukovinas I, Karavasilis V, Kioumis I, Pitsiou G, Papaiwannou A, Karavergou A, Tsakiridis K, Katsikogiannis N, Sarika E, Kapanidis K, Sakkas L, Korantzis I, Lampaki S, Zarogoulidis K, Zarogoulidis P. Physiology of the pleural space. J Thorac Dis. 2015 Feb;7(Suppl 1):S33-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.12.48.
Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. The modern diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. BMJ. 2015 Sep 8;351:h4520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4520. No abstract available.
Eibenberger KL, Dock WI, Ammann ME, Dorffner R, Hormann MF, Grabenwoger F. Quantification of pleural effusions: sonography versus radiography. Radiology. 1994 Jun;191(3):681-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.3.8184046.
Usta E, Mustafi M, Ziemer G. Ultrasound estimation of volume of postoperative pleural effusion in cardiac surgery patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):204-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.222273. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Remerand F, Dellamonica J, Mao Z, Ferrari F, Bouhemad B, Jianxin Y, Arbelot C, Lu Q, Ichai C, Rouby JJ. Multiplane ultrasound approach to quantify pleural effusion at the bedside. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):656-64. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1769-9. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ScarlataS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.