Dynamic Infrared Thermography as an Alternative to CT Angiography

NCT ID: NCT02806518

Last Updated: 2016-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) is an imaging method that does not require ionizing radiation or contrast injection. The study evaluates if DIRT can be an alternative to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in perforator mapping. DIRT findings are compared with hand-held Doppler, CTA and intraoperative findings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction the blood supply to the DIEP flap is reestablished by anastomosing the perforator to the internal mammary vessels. The selected perforator is crucial for flap survival as it is the only source of blood supply to the flap. CTA allows for precise anatomical description of the origin of perforators, their intramuscular course and point of fascia penetration but expose the patient to ionizing radiation and an intravenous contrast medium.

DIRT is an imaging method that does not require ionizing radiation or contrast injection. The study evaluates if DIRT can be an alternative to CTA in perforator mapping. The study is performed in a hospital where DIRT and CTA have been established preoperative imaging methods that have been used for several years as routine examinations for all DIEP breast reconstruction patients.

25 patients scheduled for secondary breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap are included. Preoperatively, the lower abdomen is examined with hand-held Doppler, DIRT and CTA. Arterial Doppler sound locations are marked on the skin.

DIRT examination involves rewarming of the abdominal skin after a mild cold challenge. The locations of hot spots on DIRT are compared with the arterial Doppler sound locations. The rate and pattern of rewarming of the hot spots are analyzed. Multiplanar CT reconstructions are used to see if hot spots are related to perforators on CTA and intraoperative findings.

When intraoperative findings confirm that a useful perforator is located at the same localization as indicated with DIRT, this perforator is used for DIEP breast reconstruction. Postoperatively the surgical outcome and possible complications related to the selected perforator are evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Women scheduled for DIEP

Women scheduled for DIEP breast reconstruction after mastectomy due to breast cancer are examined with DIRT, hand-held Doppler and CTA

DIRT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

An infrared camera is used to capture video sequences of thermal images before, during and after exposure of the lower abdomen to a cold challenge.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DIRT

An infrared camera is used to capture video sequences of thermal images before, during and after exposure of the lower abdomen to a cold challenge.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for breast reconstruction with DIEP flap

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior breast reconstruction / abdominal flap surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Tromso

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital of North Norway

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sven Weum, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of North Norway

Tromsø, Trom, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cina A, Salgarello M, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P, Bonomo L. Planning breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforating vessels: multidetector CT angiography versus color Doppler US. Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):979-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091166. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20392982 (View on PubMed)

Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Current techniques in preoperative imaging for abdomen-based perforator flap microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Jan;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244806. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20024888 (View on PubMed)

Blondeel PN, Beyens G, Verhaeghe R, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Monstrey SJ, Matton G. Doppler flowmetry in the planning of perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1998 Apr;51(3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(98)80010-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9664879 (View on PubMed)

de Weerd L, Mercer JB, Weum S. Dynamic infrared thermography. Clin Plast Surg. 2011 Apr;38(2):277-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.03.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21620152 (View on PubMed)

de Weerd L, Weum S, Mercer JB. The value of dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in perforatorselection and planning of free DIEP flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Sep;63(3):274-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b597d8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19700958 (View on PubMed)

Weum S, Mercer JB, de Weerd L. Evaluation of dynamic infrared thermography as an alternative to CT angiography for perforator mapping in breast reconstruction: a clinical study. BMC Med Imaging. 2016 Jul 15;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12880-016-0144-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27421763 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009/17(REK)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Breast Lymph Node Mapping
NCT01038908 UNKNOWN PHASE2