The Tomosynthesis Trial in Bergen - Part 2

NCT ID: NCT03669926

Last Updated: 2024-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31082 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare early performance measures and economic aspects of organized breast cancer screening for women screened using digital breast tomosynthesis+synthetic mammography (DBT+SM) to women with a prior DBT+SM or digital mammography (DM) from To-Be 1 (NCT02835625).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a new "three-dimensional" screening tool for breast cancer, claimed to be superior to standard two-dimensional (2D) digital mammography (DM) based on results of lower or similar recall rate, and a 30-50% higher rate of screen-detected breast cancer for DBT compared to DM.

The Bergen Tomosynthesis Trial (To-Be) is a randomized controlled trial investigating whether DBT, including synthetic mammography (SM), is superior for breast cancer screening to DM (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02835625) - hereafter referred to as To-Be 1. The study is run as part of BreastScreen Norway (inviting women aged 50-69 to screening every two years). It started in October 2015 and finished recruitment in December 2017, after two years - one screening round - of data collection.

Results from To-Be 1 will fill some of the knowledge gaps regarding DBT+SM in screening. However, running To-Be 1 and recent publications on the topic have identified additional challenges and new evidence gaps that are important to address before DBT can be considered for use in organized screening. Thus, the To-Be trail will be extended with five more year (To-Be 2), consisting of one additional screening round (two years) where all women in the study population are screened with DBT+SM with a three year follow-up.

To investigate the effect of subsequent screening with DBT+SM all women attending mammography screening in Bergen in 2018 and 2019 will be screened with DBT+SM. To-Be 2 is a prospective cohort study targeting 32 000 women, and all women attending screening will be asked if they are willing to take part in the study after receiving written and oral information about the study. Women willing to participate in the study will sign an informed consent form. We expect a participation rate of 90%. The participating women will be screened with DBT+SM. Women not willing to participate in the study will be screened with DM, and not included in our study.

Continuing To-Be 1 with To-Be 2 is the only opportunity to get information on women subsequently screened with DBT+SM, that have a prior DBT+SM or DM based on random allocation. This will also allow the investigators to analyze data on interval breast cancer among women screened with DBT+SM after DBT+SM and with DBT+SM after DM in To-Be 1 in 2020.

The investigators aim to address the following topics and research questions:

Part I: Early performance measures for screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM, and DBT+SM after DM.

Part II: Interval breast cancer following screening with DBT+SM versus DM, focusing on interval breast cancers identified among women screened in To-Be 1.

Part III: Missed and true screen-detected and interval breast cancer in mammographic screening with DBT+SM versus DM.

Part IV: Expected and experienced discomfort and pain in DBT+SM by compression force and pressure.

Part V: Economic evaluation of continuous use of DBT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DBT+SM

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis+synthetic mammography (DBT+SM) All women are screened with DBT+SM. All examinations are independently double read. Consensus used to decide whether or not to recall.

Group Type OTHER

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis+synthetic mammography

Intervention Type RADIATION

Two-view tomosynthesis performed with GE Senographe Pristina.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis+synthetic mammography

Two-view tomosynthesis performed with GE Senographe Pristina.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DBT+SM

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written, informed consent to participation

Exclusion Criteria

* No written, informed consent to participation
* Breast implants
Minimum Eligible Age

48 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

71 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Haukeland University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oslo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norwegian Cancer Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Solveig Hofvind, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer Registry of Norway

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

190184-2017

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

17/209

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Long-term Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment
NCT03877029 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING