Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening Program

NCT ID: NCT06059300

Last Updated: 2025-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-17

Study Completion Date

2028-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) creates a digital pseudo- three-dimensional image of the breast similar to mammography. This gives the screening radiologist more information about a possible abnormality. As a result, breast cancer can be found earlier, but more women might need to be recalled.

In the STREAM study, the aim is to identify the impact of DBT on the screen-detected cancer and recall rates, and on interval and advanced cancer rates in 18,200 women after two rounds of screening. For comparison, a control group of about 86,400 women will be selected from the database of the national screening program. Women, screening radiographers, and screening radiologists will be asked whether they find this new screening technique acceptable. Furthermore, the optimal strategy for screening radiologists to read the DBT images will be identified and the cost-effectiveness of screening with DBT will be determined. The images and data will be stored in a database for future research.

Expected outcome:

As a result of this project, the researchers will have shown if breast cancer screening with DBT in the Netherlands should be implemented or not. It will also be demonstrated, were it to be introduced, how it should be implemented, having addressed all the remaining questions, and having found the optimal DBT workflow specifically for a high-volume population-based screening program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the last decade, several large-scale European studies have shown that digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) increases the detection rate from \~6 to \~9 cancers per 1000 women screened, while the recall rate approaches 3.5% to 4%, independent of the initial recall rate. In the Dutch screening setting with digital mammography (DM), the recall rate is only 2.4%. Therefore, introducing DBT in the Netherlands will likely generate an increase in false positives, but the magnitude of this increase is unknown.

Furthermore, the \~50x increase in the number of images resulting from a DBT exam compared to a DM exam doubles the reading time. For DBT screening in the Netherlands to be feasible from the economic and human resources point of view, the interpretation of these cases must be accelerated, to result in an average reading time comparable to that of reviewing DM exams.

The aim of this project is to make the replacement of DM with DBT in the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening Program feasible and sustainable, by ensuring its acceptability by the various stakeholders, optimizing the acquisition and reading strategy, determining its expected impact on the national recall rate, and determining its cost-effectiveness. In addition, completion of this project will result in the creation of a DBT-based screening database available for future research.

Work Package (WP) 1 will involve the introduction of DBT in 6 of the 71 screening units in the country to screen 18,200 women for two screening rounds. This study is powered to detect a combined one-third reduction in the interval and advanced cancer rates with DBT screening as the primary endpoint. In addition, as secondary endpoints, the Dutch DBT-based screening recall rates will be determined for the first and second rounds of DBT screening. A contemporary control group of about 86,400 women screened with DM will be selected from the screening database (ScreenIT) of the national screening program. This control group will be selected to reflect the distribution of urban and rural areas as well as the mixture of mobile and fixed units of the screening units selected for the intervention group. In addition, the attendees, and the screening radiographers and radiologists will be surveyed to identify any barriers that limit acceptability of this new modality. Finally, WP1 will also involve the creation of a DBT-based screening database for further research.

In WP2, the optimal DBT reading strategy to be used in the Dutch screening program to minimize the increase in reading time with DBT, will be identified. For this, retrospective observer studies will be performed, using the images from WP1, to test eight different acquisition and reading strategies, some involving the use of cutting-edge artificial intelligence computer systems. These strategies have been shown in initial studies, many performed by the sponsor, to result in a significant reduction in reading time, with no or minimal loss in performance. Once the optimal reading strategies is identified, it will be used to interpret the entire second round of DBT screening acquired in WP1 at the screening reading units retrospectively. In this way, its actual performance and impact on reading time in the real screening environment will be determined.

Finally, in WP3, the results from the other two WPs will be used to model the entire DBT screening program and therefore predict the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this new screening program. The only method possible to estimate the impact of screening on long-term effects, such as breast cancer mortality and morbidity, as well as cost-effectiveness, is the use of modelling. Therefore, the well-validated MISCAN model will be used, with the data and results gathered, to estimate the long-term impact of DBT screening.

As a result of this project, if successful, breast cancer screening with DBT will be ready for nationwide implementation, having addressed all the country-specific questions and having optimized the DBT workflow specifically for a high-volume population-based screening program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

18200 participants who will be screened with tomosynthesis instead of digital mammography. All participants will be asked to participate in the study for 2 screening rounds. The number of participants for the second round will be less, due to drop-outs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis instead of Digital Mammography, for two screening rounds

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis instead of Digital Mammography, for two screening rounds

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women who are invited to participate to the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening program in the age group 50-72 years..

Exclusion Criteria

* Disabled women
* Women who are wheelchair bound
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

72 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

LRCB Dutch Expert Centre for Screening

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dutch Breast Cancer Association

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sydney

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hologic B.V.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Volpara Health Technologies Ltd

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lunit Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Screenpoint Medical BV

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sectra Benelux

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

iCAD

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dutch Foundation of Population Screening

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mireille Broeders, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Ioannis Sechopoulos, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Nicolien van Ravesteyn, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13710

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

5550402130002

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

114374

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial
NCT02616432 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA