Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening Program
NCT ID: NCT06059300
Last Updated: 2025-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
18200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-17
2028-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the STREAM study, the aim is to identify the impact of DBT on the screen-detected cancer and recall rates, and on interval and advanced cancer rates in 18,200 women after two rounds of screening. For comparison, a control group of about 86,400 women will be selected from the database of the national screening program. Women, screening radiographers, and screening radiologists will be asked whether they find this new screening technique acceptable. Furthermore, the optimal strategy for screening radiologists to read the DBT images will be identified and the cost-effectiveness of screening with DBT will be determined. The images and data will be stored in a database for future research.
Expected outcome:
As a result of this project, the researchers will have shown if breast cancer screening with DBT in the Netherlands should be implemented or not. It will also be demonstrated, were it to be introduced, how it should be implemented, having addressed all the remaining questions, and having found the optimal DBT workflow specifically for a high-volume population-based screening program.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Trial of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in Breast Cancer Screening.
NCT03733106
Prospective Chart-Review: Impact of Combination - Digital Breast Tomosynthesis + Digital Mammography
NCT01593384
Assessment of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in the Screening Environment
NCT01106911
Testing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Regular Mammogram in Detecting Breast Cancer in Women Having Screening Mammogram
NCT00535678
Early Detection of Breast Cancer Using Tomosynthesis Imaging
NCT00637598
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Furthermore, the \~50x increase in the number of images resulting from a DBT exam compared to a DM exam doubles the reading time. For DBT screening in the Netherlands to be feasible from the economic and human resources point of view, the interpretation of these cases must be accelerated, to result in an average reading time comparable to that of reviewing DM exams.
The aim of this project is to make the replacement of DM with DBT in the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening Program feasible and sustainable, by ensuring its acceptability by the various stakeholders, optimizing the acquisition and reading strategy, determining its expected impact on the national recall rate, and determining its cost-effectiveness. In addition, completion of this project will result in the creation of a DBT-based screening database available for future research.
Work Package (WP) 1 will involve the introduction of DBT in 6 of the 71 screening units in the country to screen 18,200 women for two screening rounds. This study is powered to detect a combined one-third reduction in the interval and advanced cancer rates with DBT screening as the primary endpoint. In addition, as secondary endpoints, the Dutch DBT-based screening recall rates will be determined for the first and second rounds of DBT screening. A contemporary control group of about 86,400 women screened with DM will be selected from the screening database (ScreenIT) of the national screening program. This control group will be selected to reflect the distribution of urban and rural areas as well as the mixture of mobile and fixed units of the screening units selected for the intervention group. In addition, the attendees, and the screening radiographers and radiologists will be surveyed to identify any barriers that limit acceptability of this new modality. Finally, WP1 will also involve the creation of a DBT-based screening database for further research.
In WP2, the optimal DBT reading strategy to be used in the Dutch screening program to minimize the increase in reading time with DBT, will be identified. For this, retrospective observer studies will be performed, using the images from WP1, to test eight different acquisition and reading strategies, some involving the use of cutting-edge artificial intelligence computer systems. These strategies have been shown in initial studies, many performed by the sponsor, to result in a significant reduction in reading time, with no or minimal loss in performance. Once the optimal reading strategies is identified, it will be used to interpret the entire second round of DBT screening acquired in WP1 at the screening reading units retrospectively. In this way, its actual performance and impact on reading time in the real screening environment will be determined.
Finally, in WP3, the results from the other two WPs will be used to model the entire DBT screening program and therefore predict the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this new screening program. The only method possible to estimate the impact of screening on long-term effects, such as breast cancer mortality and morbidity, as well as cost-effectiveness, is the use of modelling. Therefore, the well-validated MISCAN model will be used, with the data and results gathered, to estimate the long-term impact of DBT screening.
As a result of this project, if successful, breast cancer screening with DBT will be ready for nationwide implementation, having addressed all the country-specific questions and having optimized the DBT workflow specifically for a high-volume population-based screening program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
18200 participants who will be screened with tomosynthesis instead of digital mammography. All participants will be asked to participate in the study for 2 screening rounds. The number of participants for the second round will be less, due to drop-outs.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis instead of Digital Mammography, for two screening rounds
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis instead of Digital Mammography, for two screening rounds
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Women who are wheelchair bound
50 Years
72 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
LRCB Dutch Expert Centre for Screening
UNKNOWN
Dutch Breast Cancer Association
UNKNOWN
University of Sydney
OTHER
Hologic B.V.
UNKNOWN
Volpara Health Technologies Ltd
UNKNOWN
Lunit Inc.
INDUSTRY
Screenpoint Medical BV
UNKNOWN
Sectra Benelux
UNKNOWN
iCAD
UNKNOWN
Dutch Foundation of Population Screening
UNKNOWN
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mireille Broeders, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Ioannis Sechopoulos, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Nicolien van Ravesteyn, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
STREAM website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13710
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
5550402130002
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
114374
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.