Molecular Breast Imaging and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening Patients With Dense Breast Tissue
NCT ID: NCT03220893
Last Updated: 2025-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
3023 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-14
2024-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low Dose Molecular Breast Imaging as a Screening Tool for Women With Dense Breasts
NCT01925170
Molecular Breast Imaging as a Screening Tool for Women With Dense Breasts
NCT00620373
MBI and Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Accuracies in Patients With Dense Breast Tissue
NCT02013726
Evaluation of Half-Dose Molecular Breast Imaging With Wide Beam Reconstruction Processing
NCT01653964
Screening in Myocardial Perfusion Patients
NCT00943241
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To compare the rate of detection of invasive cancers between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone versus (vs.) the combination of DBT with supplemental MBI at year 0 screening.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the invasive cancer detection rates of DBT alone vs. MBI alone at year 0 screening.
II. To compare the screening performance metrics of sensitivity, specificity, recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for DBT and MBI.
III. To compare tumor characteristics of all cancers (invasive and noninvasive) detected on DBT and MBI, including size, nodal status, and molecular subtype.
IV. To assess the reduction in advanced cancer rate with incorporation of MBI screening by comparing advanced cancer rate observed at year 1 screening relative to that at year 0.
V. To assess the rate of interval cancers with incorporation of MBI screening. VI. To examine the relative performance of DBT and MBI within subgroups categorized by breast cancer risk.
OUTLINE:
Participants undergo DBT and MBI at year 0 and year 1 screening.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Observational (MBI, DBT)
Participants undergo DBT and MBI at year 0 and year 1 screening.
Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography
Undergo DBT
Scintimammography
Undergo MBI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography
Undergo DBT
Scintimammography
Undergo MBI
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient is scheduled for routine screening DBT
* Patient is asymptomatic for breast disease
* Patient had heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts on most recent prior mammography examination (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System \[BI-RADS\] c or d) within 24 months of enrollment
* Patient is able to participate fully in all aspects of the study (completing study visits and study data collection)
* Patient understands and signs the study informed consent
* Patient anticipates being able to return one year after study enrollment to complete the second round of screening
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is currently lactating
* Patient has had a prior MBI
* Patient has had a prior whole breast ultrasound (WBUS) for screening, with either a hand-held ultrasound probe or automated system, within 12 months prior to study enrollment
* Patient has had a prior breast MRI
* Patient has had a prior contrast-enhanced mammogram (contrast enhanced spectral mammography \[CESM\] or contrast-enhanced digital mammography \[CEDM\])
* Patient is concurrently participating in any other breast imaging research studies that involve undergoing additional breast imaging tests beyond routine screening with mammography, including but not limited to contrast-enhanced mammography, WBUS, MBI, or contrast-enhanced breast MRI
* Patient has had a breast biopsy within 3 months prior to study enrollment
* Patient has had breast surgery within 12 months prior to study enrollment
* Patient is currently undergoing treatment for breast cancer or planning surgery for a high-risk breast lesion (atypical ductal hyperplasia \[ADH\], atypical lobular hyperplasia \[ALH\], lobular carcinoma in situ \[LCIS\], papilloma, radial scar)
* Patient is currently taking a chemoprevention agent for breast cancer risk reduction or osteoporosis prevention (tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrazole, letrozole, exemestane)
* Patient has a known history of any condition or factor judged by the investigator to preclude participation in the study or which might hinder study adherence
40 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
OTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carrie Hruska
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carrie B. Hruska, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Toledo Clinic Cancer Centers-Toledo
Toledo, Ohio, United States
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2021-12015
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
16-008522
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.