Radiotherapy After Primary Chemotherapy for Breastcancer
NCT ID: NCT01279304
Last Updated: 2022-10-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
851 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-01-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single Dose Ablative Radiation Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
NCT02316561
Pre-operative Contrast Enhanced CT to Improve Delineation of the Tumorbed in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.
NCT00721058
MRI-guided Single Dose Preoperative Radiotherapy in Low-risk Breast Cancer
NCT03863301
Association of Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Non-metastatic Breast Carcinoma With Immunomodulation and Circulating Tumor Cell Phenotype in Relation to Patient Age.
NCT04902937
Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients With Locally Recurrent or Second Primary Breast Cancer
NCT06362616
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the 5 yr locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) in cT1-2cN0-1(cytology/histology and/or positive SN, excluding patients with \> 3 pathologic axillary nodes on imaging) breast cancer patients, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast surgery, and radiotherapy that is protocolized based on the pathology findings after chemotherapy and definitive surgery (ypTNM stage). The secondary aim is to develop a risk model based on risk factors, that can be used to predict which of the patients with a cT1-2cN0-1 breast carcinoma, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, have a 5 yr LRR \> 8 % if radiotherapy is withheld.
Study design: This study is a multicentre prospective cohort study. Study population: In total 710 patients with cT1-2pN0-1, excluding ≥cN2 and patients with \> 3 pathologic axillary nodes on imaging, breast cancer, treated with at least three cycles of chemotherapy followed by breast and axillary surgery are eligible for the study.
During 5 years (2011-2015) patients diagnosed for primary breast cancer and eligible according to the criteria will be registered by the National Cancer Registry in this project.
Currently, three surgical strategies are being followed in cT1-2N0-1 patients, treated with primary systemic treatment :
1. A full axillary lymph node dissection is performed after the primary systemic treatment , OR
2. A sentinel node procedure is carried out prior to neoadjuvant treatment, and no further axillary surgery is performed after chemotherapy, if the patient is clinically node negative (ycN0)), OR
3. A sentinel node procedure is carried out only after primary systemic treatment , in case patient is still/has become clinically node negative (ycN0).
For all three above mentioned strategies, patients are divided into three risk groups, mainly based on the post chemotherapy pathological nodal status (strategy 1 and 3), and on the pre-chemotherapy pathological nodal status and ycN0 status (strategy 2). In addition, for all three strategies the cT and the ycT status are taken into account to choose the recommended guideline.
The radiation treatment guidelines for the subsequent three risk groups consist of:
1. Group I - low risk (N = 237):
1. after MRM: no radiotherapy
2. after BCT: radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional)
2. Group II - intermediate risk (N = 237):
1. after MRM: radiation treatment of the thoracic wall
2. after BCT: radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional)
3. if no full ALND is performed: add radiation treatment to level 1 and 2
3. Group III - high risk group(N = 237):
1. after MRM: radiation treatment of the thoracic wall and supraclavicular nodes
2. after BCT: radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional), and supraclavicular nodes
3. if no full ALND is performed (not recommended): add radiation treatment to the axilla level 1 and 2 RT of the axillary (after ALND) and internal mammary chain nodes is optional for group III, based on the local protocol. In case of a positive sentinel node in the internal mammary chain prior to chemotherapy, internal mammary chain irradiation is strongly recommended Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the 5 yr locoregional recurrence rate (LRR). Secondary endpoints are 10 year LRR, 5, 10, and 15 yr relapse free survival rates (all events except lost to follow-up, invasive contralateral cancer, and secondary primary (non-breast) invasive cancer) and overall survival rates. In addition, analyses will be performed to investigate whether pre-radiotherapy factors (e.g. like age \< 40 yr, response to chemotherapy, tumour size) can be identified that correlate with a high LRR.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Currently no clear data are present in literature showing the indications for radiotherapy in this patient group. Based on literature that is available for patients treated with chemotherapy after surgery we have chosen what we think might be the optimal treatment from a benefit/risk perspective. The study focuses on adequate registration of all risk factors, treatment, and outcome.
Date amendment: 1 July 2013
The main reason for writing an amendment is that current guidelines on axillary treatment are changing, both with respect to surgery and with respect to radiation treatment. Not sufficient data are yet present in literature to define a sound evidence based guideline. However, recent new data strongly suggest that the guidelines should be adapted. Therefore, we adapted the guidelines within the framework of this protocol, with as aim to carefully follow and record the outcome of patients treated with these new guidelines. Whilst writing this amendment, we also used this opportunity to better define "suspicious nodes" on imaging, and to add another very relevant endpoint: relapse free survival.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1. Low risk
1. Surgical strategy is full axillary lymph node dissection after primary systemic treatment and in case of:
a. all nodes negative: ycN0
or
2. Surgical strategy is sentinel node procedure only performed prior to primary systemic treatment and in case of:
a. only micrometastases in the SN, and no risk factors (grade 3, LVI, tumour size \> 3 cm)
or
3. Surgical strategy is sentinel node procedure only performed after primary systemic treatment and in case of:
1. no metastases in the post chemo SN
radiation - no radiation see intervention description
after MRM in group 1 (low risk): no radiotherapy after BCT in group 1 (low risk): radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional)
Group 2: Intermediate risk
1. Surgical strategy is full axillary lymph node dissection after primary systemic treatment and in case of:
a. 1-3 nodes positive: ypN1
or
2. Surgical strategy is sentinel node procedure only performed prior to primary systemic treatment and in case of:
1. micrometastases in the SN and at least 1 risk factor; or
2. ≤ 2 macrometastases and no risk factor
or
3. Surgical strategy is sentinel node procedure only performed after primary systemic treatment and in case of:
1. micrometastases in the post chemo SN and no risk factors (grade 3, LVI, tumour size \> 3 cm)
radiation: see intervention description
after BCT in group 2 (intermediate risk): radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional) after MRM in group 2 (intermediate risk): radiation treatment of the thoracic wall If no full ALND is performed in group 2 (intermediate risk) add radiation treatment of level 1 and 2 of the axilla.
Group 3. High risk
1. Surgical strategy is full axillary lymph node dissection after primary systemic treatment and in case of:
a. 4 or more nodes positive: ypN2
or
2. Surgical strategy is sentinel node procedure only performed prior to primary systemic treatment and in case of:
1. ≤ 2 macrometastases in the sentinel node prior to primary systemic treatment in the presence of risk factors like Grade 3, lymphangioinvasion, tumour size \> 3 cm; or
2. 3 macrometastases, 2 macrometastases and 1 micrometastase, 1 macrometastase and 2 micrometastases.
or
3. Surgical strategy is sentinel node procedure only performed after primary systemic treatment and in case of:
1. Micrometastases in the post chemo SN, and at least one risk factor
2. ≤ 3 macrometastases in the post chemo SN; or
3. 2 macrometastases and 1 micrometastase, 1 macrometastase and 2 micrometastases
radiation: see intervention description
after MRM in group 3 (high risk): radiation treatment of the thoracic wall and supraclavicular nodes after BCT in group 3 (high risk): radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional) and supraclavicular nodes If no full ALND is performed group 3 (high risk) add radiation treatment of level 1 and 2 of the axilla.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
radiation - no radiation see intervention description
after MRM in group 1 (low risk): no radiotherapy after BCT in group 1 (low risk): radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional)
radiation: see intervention description
after BCT in group 2 (intermediate risk): radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional) after MRM in group 2 (intermediate risk): radiation treatment of the thoracic wall If no full ALND is performed in group 2 (intermediate risk) add radiation treatment of level 1 and 2 of the axilla.
radiation: see intervention description
after MRM in group 3 (high risk): radiation treatment of the thoracic wall and supraclavicular nodes after BCT in group 3 (high risk): radiation treatment of the breast with boost (optional) and supraclavicular nodes If no full ALND is performed group 3 (high risk) add radiation treatment of level 1 and 2 of the axilla.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 3 cycles of primary systemic treatment have been given (irrespective of the regimen)
* No standard axillary lymph node dissection is performed prior to chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with \> 3 suspicious axillary nodes on imaging
* cN2-3 prior to any treatment
* More than focally irradical surgery and breast conserving therapy
To investigate whether a patient is eligible for the RAPCHEM study, a meticulous examination of the axilla is necessary. Therefore each patient should undergo an ultrasound of the axilla and if possible an ultrasound guided needle biopsy UNB (FNA or core). The US/UNB can be performed instantly or as second look in case of enlarged nodes on MRI. The criteria for performing an UNB are:
* Cortex \>2.3 mm not measured at the poles of the node; or
* Disappearance of the fatty hilum; or
* Asymmetric bulging of the cortex of a lymph node;
If a PET-CT is performed the worst outcome of the two studies is accepted as the real clinical stage of the axilla (i.e. 1 PA proven positive lymph node on ultrasound and 3 on PET-CT; means 3 positive lymph nodes)
The N status of the axilla prior to chemotherapy is based upon:
* Positive PET-CT of more than one but less than 4 axillary nodes; since the specificity of PET positive nodes in a proven breast cancer patient is very high, pathology confirmation is not absolutely required
* Positive US of axillary nodes; at least one should be pathology proven tumour positive
* The worst outcome of 1 and 2 represents the most reliable clinical axillary staging.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
OTHER
Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht
OTHER
Maastricht Radiation Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
L.J Boersma
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Centre
A Voogd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University
R Houben
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UMC St Radboud Nijmegen
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Maastro clinic
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Dr. B. Verbeeten Institute
Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Diakonessen Hospital Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boersma LJ, Verloop J, Voogd AC, Elkhuizen PHM, Houben R, van Leeuwen AE, Linn S, de Munck L, Pijnappel R, Strobbe L, van Dalen T, Wesseling J, Poortmans P. Radiotherapy after primary CHEMotherapy (RAPCHEM): Practice variation in a Dutch registration study (BOOG 2010-03). Radiother Oncol. 2020 Apr;145:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
de Wild SR, de Munck L, Simons JM, Verloop J, van Dalen T, Elkhuizen PHM, Houben RMA, van Leeuwen AE, Linn SC, Pijnappel RM, Poortmans PMP, Strobbe LJA, Wesseling J, Voogd AC, Boersma LJ. De-escalation of radiotherapy after primary chemotherapy in cT1-2N1 breast cancer (RAPCHEM; BOOG 2010-03): 5-year follow-up results of a Dutch, prospective, registry study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Sep;23(9):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00482-X. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-04-10/02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.