Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physiology of Lung Collapse Under One-Lung Ventilation: Underlying Mechanisms
NCT02919267
Open Lung Approach Versus Standard Protective Strategies
NCT02798133
The Effect of Two Airway Interventions, During One Lung Ventilation, on Blood Oxygen Content
NCT01495936
A Prospective Descriptive Study of the Individualized Capnography of Both Lungs During One-lung Ventilation With Double-lumen Tube
NCT04962581
Atelectasis After Pulmonary Lobectomy: The Effect Of Air During One-Lung Ventilation (OLV) On Postoperative Atelectasis
NCT01289691
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One hour before thoracic surgery, the patient-subjects received diazepam 0.15 mg kg-1 as premedication. After arriving at the operating theatre, standard monitoring system practices was applied, including heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse oximetry (SpO2). Moreover, an intra-vein cannula was placed, and the infusion of multi-electrolytic fluid 5-10 ml kg-1 h-1 was started. After pre-oxygenation, atropine 0.5 mg and fentanyl 3 µg kg-1 were given, and the induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone 5-7 mg kg-1 was started. Suxamethonium was administered for neuromuscular blockade, and bronchial intubation with a Robertshow double lumen tube was performed. The left bronchus was intubated for right lung surgery, and the right bronchus was intubated for left lung surgery. Tube placement was checked via auscultation and fiberscope. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, additional fentanyl doses were used if needed, and neuromuscular blockade was obtained with vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1. Additionally, 0.1 mg kg-1 dose of morphine was given subcutaneously for postoperative pain control. Patients were also ventilated with O2 (oxygen) and AIR (air) mixture, using the following settings: volume control intermittent positive pressure ventilation, FiO2 (oxygen fraction) 0.4, Vt (tidal volume) 6-10 ml/kg, and f (frequency) 12-15 /min. Furthermore, end tidal CO2 (carbon dioxide) was monitored due to normocapnia maintenance (4.0-5.3 kPa). At the end of surgery, intercostal blockade was brought about with 0.5% bupivacaine, with 5 ml for each nerve. Finally, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 0.04 mg kg-1 and with atropine 0.01 mg kg-1.
After anaesthesia stabilisation, the unique control system was used, called the 'tidal volume divider'. This device was placed between the anaesthetic machine and the double lumen tube of the patient. This control system enables conventional ventilation (without any intervention from the control system, as the settings are defined on the ventilator), as well as independent ventilation with division of the tidal volume between the lungs in proportions of 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 5:1. It also enables PEEP (selective positive end-expiratory pressure) application to each lung. With independent ventilation, settings such as frequency, tidal volume and inspiration time are defined by ventilator, and this system only controls the direction of tidal volume to each lung (as the control system is a flow divider) by using a differential pneumatic resistor. It also enables dependent and non-dependent lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus positions. Furthermore, the system monitors the expired volume, airway pressure and dynamic compliance of each lung. This device was described and tested on mechanical lung models with a variety of lung model mechanics (compliance, resistance) and ventilation parameters (frequency, tidal volume). It was also tested clinically for its safety during our previous study. The system was invented, developed and patented by a group of Polish engineers from the Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ventilation
Measurements were made for conventional and independent at 1:1 proportion ventilation in supine position; then independent ventilation was discontinued and patient was moved to right or left decubitus position due to left or right lung surgery. Then were made measurements for conventional anaesthetic practices and followed independent at 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 5:1 proportions ventilation routines. Constantly were monitored expired volume, peak respiratory pressure, dynamic compliance separately for each lung. Measurements covered also hemodynamic (MAP, HR) and oxygenation (SpO2). These attributes were documented at each point of the study. Subsequently, the control system was disconnected and performed typical anaesthetic procedures for thoracic surgery with a one-lung ventilation procedure.
independent ventilation
comparison conventional and independent 1:1 ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
independent ventilation
comparison conventional and independent 1:1 ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Lublin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Slawomir Sawulski, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Lublin, Poland
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Darowski M, Englisz M. Artificial ventilation of the lungs for emergencies. Front Med Biol Eng. 2000;10(3):177-83. doi: 10.1163/15685570052062576.
Sawulski S, Nestorowicz A, Sawicki M, Kowalczyk M, Ston M. [Independent lung ventilation during general anaesthesia--preliminary report]. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2010 Jan-Mar;42(1):6-10. Polish.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MULublin
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.