Contribution of Preoperative Biological Data in Risk Assessment in Cardiac Surgery in Addition to the EuroSCORE (EuroSCOREbio)
NCT ID: NCT02783781
Last Updated: 2019-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
9500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-08-01
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, the objectivity and the predictive ability of some of those clinical items remain controversial, particularly those addressing severity of illness for high-risk patients. For instance, the degree of priority is submitted to the subjective assessment by the surgical team at the time of surgery. Objective data describing the severity of patients arriving in the operating room are still missing.
Many biomarkers are relevant in qualifying severity of syndromes: shock (PH, lactates, LDH), heart disease (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), troponin T and I), respiratory disorder (blood gaz analysis), liver insufficiency (TP, factor V), renal impairment (serum creatinine, creatinine clearance), inflammatory condition (fibrinogen, CRP), or the underlying medical condition such as diabetes (HbA1c, microalbuminuria) and nutritional status (albumin).
In ICU, many scores use biological data to measure, on daily basis, the severity of the patient status. Their routine use is simplified by applications available on smartphones. They are drawn into hospital information systems.
In cardiac surgery, some studies seem to demonstrate the measurement of some preoperative biological variables (eg NT Pro-BNP ...) in risk prediction. In terms of diabetes, HbA1c is of particular interest because it detects underlying diabetes if unknown (emergent situation) or reflects its poor control before surgery. This criterion could be more reliable than the simple information of patient treated by insulin (EuroSCORE II criterion).
Finally, the reinforcement of existing scores with biological variables is recommended by the group of recommendations in prognostic research strategy (PROGRESS 2014), rather than creating new scores ex nihilo.
The hypothesis is that adding biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room would better qualify the patients' severity condition and therefore increase the risk prediction of early mortality and severe morbidity after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to test this hypothesis and especially test whether the biological data would increase the EuroSCORE II performance, by improving the prediction for high-risk patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multicenter Validation of a Predictor Model of ACHD Patients and Cardiac Surgery
NCT04787705
Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Preoperative Quadriceps and Respiratory Muscle Thickness by Ultrasound Measurement in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery Patients
NCT05412095
Prognostic Value of the Selvester QRS Score for Perioperative Myocardial Injury Following Non-cardiac Surgery
NCT05453097
Comparison of Cardiac Index and Stroke-volume-index Measured by Pulmonary Artery Catheter, FloTrac® and Argos® in Cardiac Surgery Patients.
NCT06918301
Multiparametric MRI Assessment of Atrial Heart Disease as a Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation After Myocardial Revascularization Surgery
NCT04657835
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary objectives:
1. Analyze EuroSCORE II calibration by risk group (external validation).
2. Studying the improvement of the EuroSCORE II-bio predictive power by risk class, especially high risk.
3. Refine selection and definition of discriminating criteria for diabetics for predicting surgical risk in cardiac surgery (the HbA1c value, the existence of microalbuminuria, the nature of treatment etc.).
4. Compare the risk profiles of operated patients in the French Overseas Departments to those from different sites of Western Europe.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cardiac surgery
All patients (planned and urgent) needed cardiac surgery, and agreed to participate
Cardiac surgery (extracorporeal circulation; beating heart)
Patient's usual care as part of cardiac surgery, analysis of biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room.
Blood sample collection Urine sample collection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiac surgery (extracorporeal circulation; beating heart)
Patient's usual care as part of cardiac surgery, analysis of biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room.
Blood sample collection Urine sample collection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients operated on extracorporeal circulation or beating heart
* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
* Patient having been informed of the research objectives
* Patient not objecting to participate in research
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient \< 18 years old
* Patient refusing to participate in the study
* Pregnant women
* Protected adult (person under guardianship and trusteeship) or deprived of liberty
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, FRANCE
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, FRANCE
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, FRANCE
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Limoges
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, FRANCE
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, FRANCE
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, FRANCE
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
University Hospital Center of Martinique
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
François ROQUES, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Martinique
Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
CHU d'Angers
Angers, , France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, , France
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, , France
Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP)
Paris, , France
Hôpital Bichat (AP-HP)
Paris, , France
CHU de La Réunion
Saint-Denis, , France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15.834
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
1912114
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
15/E/01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.