Contribution of Preoperative Biological Data in Risk Assessment in Cardiac Surgery in Addition to the EuroSCORE (EuroSCOREbio)

NCT ID: NCT02783781

Last Updated: 2019-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

9500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In cardiac surgery, the assessment of operative risk and quality of care is a major challenge for both patient, and surgical team. It is also important for health care decisionmakers to have predictive tools to compare alternative technics such as conventional cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology. Since 1998, the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), updated in 2012 (EuroSCORE II) is the most universally used system in this purpose. Its success is the result of a good balance between predictive capability and simplicity. It consists almost exclusively of clinical variables.

However, the objectivity and the predictive ability of some of those clinical items remain controversial, particularly those addressing severity of illness for high-risk patients. For instance, the degree of priority is submitted to the subjective assessment by the surgical team at the time of surgery. Objective data describing the severity of patients arriving in the operating room are still missing.

Many biomarkers are relevant in qualifying severity of syndromes: shock (PH, lactates, LDH), heart disease (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), troponin T and I), respiratory disorder (blood gaz analysis), liver insufficiency (TP, factor V), renal impairment (serum creatinine, creatinine clearance), inflammatory condition (fibrinogen, CRP), or the underlying medical condition such as diabetes (HbA1c, microalbuminuria) and nutritional status (albumin).

In ICU, many scores use biological data to measure, on daily basis, the severity of the patient status. Their routine use is simplified by applications available on smartphones. They are drawn into hospital information systems.

In cardiac surgery, some studies seem to demonstrate the measurement of some preoperative biological variables (eg NT Pro-BNP ...) in risk prediction. In terms of diabetes, HbA1c is of particular interest because it detects underlying diabetes if unknown (emergent situation) or reflects its poor control before surgery. This criterion could be more reliable than the simple information of patient treated by insulin (EuroSCORE II criterion).

Finally, the reinforcement of existing scores with biological variables is recommended by the group of recommendations in prognostic research strategy (PROGRESS 2014), rather than creating new scores ex nihilo.

The hypothesis is that adding biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room would better qualify the patients' severity condition and therefore increase the risk prediction of early mortality and severe morbidity after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to test this hypothesis and especially test whether the biological data would increase the EuroSCORE II performance, by improving the prediction for high-risk patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Main objective: To improve the EuroSCORE II predictive power on the 90-day mortality and/or severe hospital morbidity, incorporating immediate preoperative biological data.

Secondary objectives:

1. Analyze EuroSCORE II calibration by risk group (external validation).
2. Studying the improvement of the EuroSCORE II-bio predictive power by risk class, especially high risk.
3. Refine selection and definition of discriminating criteria for diabetics for predicting surgical risk in cardiac surgery (the HbA1c value, the existence of microalbuminuria, the nature of treatment etc.).
4. Compare the risk profiles of operated patients in the French Overseas Departments to those from different sites of Western Europe.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients Requiring Cardiac Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cardiac surgery

All patients (planned and urgent) needed cardiac surgery, and agreed to participate

Cardiac surgery (extracorporeal circulation; beating heart)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient's usual care as part of cardiac surgery, analysis of biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room.

Blood sample collection Urine sample collection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cardiac surgery (extracorporeal circulation; beating heart)

Patient's usual care as part of cardiac surgery, analysis of biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room.

Blood sample collection Urine sample collection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient \> 18 years old at the time of inclusion
* All patients operated on extracorporeal circulation or beating heart
* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
* Patient having been informed of the research objectives
* Patient not objecting to participate in research

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient receiving heart transplant
* Patient \< 18 years old
* Patient refusing to participate in the study
* Pregnant women
* Protected adult (person under guardianship and trusteeship) or deprived of liberty
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Limoges

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Center of Martinique

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

François ROQUES, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Martinique

Fort-de-France, Martinique, France

Site Status

CHU d'Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CHU de Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Limoges

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP)

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Bichat (AP-HP)

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU de La Réunion

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15.834

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1912114

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

15/E/01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.