Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy Vs. Video Laryngoscopy With The C-MAC For Pyloromyotomy

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2022-07-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two different ways of placing breathing tubes for surgery. Both ways are used currently to place breathing tubes and are safe and effective. This study seeks to determine if one way is better than the other for infants with pyloric stenosis.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Using Video Laryngoscopy for Neonatal Intubation

NCT03035175

Education, Medical

COMPLETED NA

Epiglottic Downfolding During Endotracheal Intubation

NCT01691963

Intubation Complication Injury of Epiglottis

WITHDRAWN NA

Endotracheal Tube Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

NCT01936662

Airway Morbidity

COMPLETED NA

A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.

NCT03230422

Airway Complication of Anesthesia

COMPLETED NA

Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric Anesthesia

NCT03747250

Tracheal Intubation Morbidity

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific aims of this study include determining if there is a difference in the desaturation rates of the two different intubation techniques- Direct Laryngoscopy and the C-MAC video laryngoscope. Also is there a difference in intubation success between the two techniques, does intubation success vary with different training levels, and does desaturation rate differ among training levels.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pyloric Stenosis Intubation, Pediatric

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy

Endotracheal intubation will be performed by conventional direct laryngoscopy.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Video Laryngoscopy

Endotracheal intubation will be performed by video laryngoscopy with the C-MAC.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Video Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Video Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

C-MAC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Need general anesthesia for pyloromyotomy procedure
* Have been informed of the nature of the study and informed consent has been obtained from the legally responsible guardian