Intervention Study of Cost-Offset Community Supported Agriculture (CO-CSA)
NCT ID: NCT02770196
Last Updated: 2020-04-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
305 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2021-03-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preventing Weight Gain and Unhealthy Behaviors in Children
NCT04608188
Healthy Children, Healthy Families: Parents Making A Difference
NCT04179565
Effectiveness of Differing Levels of Support for Family Mealtimes on Obesity Prevention Among Head Start Preschools
NCT02487251
Reducing Health Disparities in Childhood Obesity
NCT04072549
USDA Healthy Caregivers/Healthy Children: A Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
NCT01722032
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
FORMATIVE AND LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH: Qualitative and quantitative research is being used to inform implementation of the randomized trial, refine outcome assessment strategies, and provide information needed to design a tailored curriculum to enhance low-income households' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors related to the use of CSA produce and healthy eating.
In the first year of the study, the investigators conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders to gather in-depth data related to the potential of CO-CSA operations to meet the needs and preferences of low-income households and the types of information that would be most valuable to include in the study's curriculum. Key stakeholder groups included adults and children from low-income households, CSA farmers, current full-paying CSA members, and nutrition educators.
The investigators also are conducting a longitudinal quantitative examination of dietary behaviors among current CO-CSA participants in an existing statewide program in Vermont. Using online surveys, the investigators are measuring dietary outcomes quarterly among children, and biannually among adults, from low-income households in the program. Data from Year 1 was used to inform the intervention, while data from subsequent time points will provide an opportunity for analysis of longitudinal patterns.
RANDOMIZED INTERVENTION: In the second phase of the project, the investigators will implement and evaluate a three-year delayed intervention randomized controlled trial of CO-CSA plus skill-based, CSA-tailored education in the four states. The investigators will compare changes in dietary behaviors, reported consumption, energy intake, and weight status parameters between children aged 2-12 in 120 control and 120 intervention households. Two hundred households were enrolled in 2016 and an additional 40 households will be enrolled in 2017. Participant households enrolled in 2016 will receive a CO-CSA share for two seasons and education during their first CO-CSA season (Y1 for intervention households and Y2 for control households). Households enrolled in 2017 will receive a CO-CSA share and education for one season (Y2 for intervention households and Y3 for control households). In addition to outcomes with participants, investigators will conduct economic analysis to evaluate the impact of CO-CSA for farms and communities. While these analyses are not related to the human participants, they are central to the overall project goals.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group One (Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment)
Group one intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2016 and 2017. During the 2016 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
Group Two (Delayed Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment)
Group two intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2017 and 2018. During the 2017 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
Group Three (One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment)
Group three intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2017 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
Group Four (Delayed One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment)
Group four delayed intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2018 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
* Self-reported income less than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level or report enrollment in SNAP, WIC, or Head Start
* Has access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
* Has an active e-mail account or willing to create an e-mail account
* Has not participated in CSA in the past three years
* Willing to purchase the 50% CO-CSA share (can use SNAP benefits if desired and available)
* Willing to attend CSA-tailored education sessions
* Willing to make a firm commitment to three years of participation (2016 enrollment) or two years of participation (2017 enrollment), with timing of the off-set benefit determined by randomization
* Complete baseline survey
* Pay deposit to farm
Exclusion Criteria
* Not the parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
* Self-reported income equal to or greater than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level and no report of SNAP, WIC, or Head Start enrollment
* Does not have access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
* Does not have an active e-mail account or is not able or willing to create an e-mail account
* Has participated in CSA in the past three years
* Not able or willing to purchase the 50% CO-CSA share
* Not able or willing to attend CSA-tailored education sessions
* Not able or willing to make a firm commitment to three years of participation (for 2016 enrollment) or two years of participation (2017 enrollment), with timing of the off-set benefit determined by randomization
* Not able or willing to complete baseline survey
* Not able or willing to pay deposit to farm
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Vermont
OTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
The Evergreen State College
UNKNOWN
Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca A. Seguin, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cornell University
Karla Hanson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cornell University
Jane Kolodinsky, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Vermont
Marilyn Sitaker, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Evergreen State College
Alice Ammerman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Stephanie Jilcott-Pitts, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
East Carolina University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barker
Barker, New York, United States
Corning
Corning, New York, United States
Gasport
Gasport, New York, United States
Lockport
Lockport, New York, United States
Medina
Medina, New York, United States
Newfane
Newfane, New York, United States
Watertown
Watertown, New York, United States
Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Pittsboro
Pittsboro, North Carolina, United States
Siler City
Siler City, North Carolina, United States
Bristol
Bristol, Vermont, United States
Burlington
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Burlington
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Cuttingsville
Cuttingsville, Vermont, United States
Hinesburg
Hinesburg, Vermont, United States
Ludlow
Ludlow, Vermont, United States
Rutland
Rutland, Vermont, United States
Rutland
Rutland, Vermont, United States
South Burlington
South Burlington, Vermont, United States
Starksboro
Starksboro, Vermont, United States
Starksboro
Starksboro, Vermont, United States
Vergennes
Vergennes, Vermont, United States
Winooski
Winooski, Vermont, United States
La Conner
La Conner, Washington, United States
Mount Vernon
Mount Vernon, Washington, United States
Olympia
Olympia, Washington, United States
Rochester
Rochester, Washington, United States
Sedro Woolley
Sedro-Woolley, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garner JA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker MH, Ammerman AS, Kenkel D, Seguin-Fowler RA. Cost analysis and cost effectiveness of a subsidized community supported agriculture intervention for low-income families. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 10;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01481-7.
Seguin-Fowler RA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Ammerman AS, Marshall GA, Belarmino EH, Garner JA, Wang W. Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01168-x.
Lu I, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Ammerman AS, Sitaker M, Wang W, Volpe LC, Belarmino EH, Garner J, Gonsalves L, Seguin RA. Perceptions of nutrition education classes offered in conjunction with a community-supported agriculture intervention among low-income families. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3028-3036. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002773. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
Seguin RA, Morgan EH, Hanson KL, Ammerman AS, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Becot FA, Connor LM, Garner JA, McGuirt JT. Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK): An innovative community supported agriculture intervention to prevent childhood obesity in low-income families and strengthen local agricultural economies. BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4202-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-68001-23230
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB #: 1501005266
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.