Intervention Study of Cost-Offset Community Supported Agriculture (CO-CSA)

NCT ID: NCT02770196

Last Updated: 2020-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

305 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2021-03-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to better understand how participation in cost-subsidized community supported agriculture programs paired with tailored education can affect diet quality and energy balance among children in low-income households.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) is an innovative approach to increasing consumer access to and consumption of fresh produce, thereby lowering obesity prevalence. However, CSA "share" costs may be a barrier for low-income households with children. This multistate study examines whether subsidizing the cost of CSAs, integrated with tailored education: 1) increases consumption of fruits and vegetables, 2) substitutes fruits and vegetables for more energy-dense foods, and 3) improves overall diet quality and energy balance, thus helping children maintain healthy body weights. It also investigates how cost-offset CSAs ("CO-CSAs") contribute to local agricultural economies. Given the well-documented risk for obesity and limited access to fresh produce among low-income individuals, those households are the target of the intervention in four geographically-diverse states: Vermont, New York, North Carolina and Washington.

FORMATIVE AND LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH: Qualitative and quantitative research is being used to inform implementation of the randomized trial, refine outcome assessment strategies, and provide information needed to design a tailored curriculum to enhance low-income households' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors related to the use of CSA produce and healthy eating.

In the first year of the study, the investigators conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders to gather in-depth data related to the potential of CO-CSA operations to meet the needs and preferences of low-income households and the types of information that would be most valuable to include in the study's curriculum. Key stakeholder groups included adults and children from low-income households, CSA farmers, current full-paying CSA members, and nutrition educators.

The investigators also are conducting a longitudinal quantitative examination of dietary behaviors among current CO-CSA participants in an existing statewide program in Vermont. Using online surveys, the investigators are measuring dietary outcomes quarterly among children, and biannually among adults, from low-income households in the program. Data from Year 1 was used to inform the intervention, while data from subsequent time points will provide an opportunity for analysis of longitudinal patterns.

RANDOMIZED INTERVENTION: In the second phase of the project, the investigators will implement and evaluate a three-year delayed intervention randomized controlled trial of CO-CSA plus skill-based, CSA-tailored education in the four states. The investigators will compare changes in dietary behaviors, reported consumption, energy intake, and weight status parameters between children aged 2-12 in 120 control and 120 intervention households. Two hundred households were enrolled in 2016 and an additional 40 households will be enrolled in 2017. Participant households enrolled in 2016 will receive a CO-CSA share for two seasons and education during their first CO-CSA season (Y1 for intervention households and Y2 for control households). Households enrolled in 2017 will receive a CO-CSA share and education for one season (Y2 for intervention households and Y3 for control households). In addition to outcomes with participants, investigators will conduct economic analysis to evaluate the impact of CO-CSA for farms and communities. While these analyses are not related to the human participants, they are central to the overall project goals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pediatric Obesity Child Nutrition Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group One (Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment)

Group one intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2016 and 2017. During the 2016 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Two (Delayed Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment)

Group two intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2017 and 2018. During the 2017 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Three (One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment)

Group three intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2017 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Four (Delayed One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment)

Group four delayed intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2018 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education

Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English-speaking
* Parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
* Self-reported income less than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level or report enrollment in SNAP, WIC, or Head Start
* Has access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
* Has an active e-mail account or willing to create an e-mail account
* Has not participated in CSA in the past three years
* Willing to purchase the 50% CO-CSA share (can use SNAP benefits if desired and available)
* Willing to attend CSA-tailored education sessions
* Willing to make a firm commitment to three years of participation (2016 enrollment) or two years of participation (2017 enrollment), with timing of the off-set benefit determined by randomization
* Complete baseline survey
* Pay deposit to farm

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English-speaking
* Not the parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
* Self-reported income equal to or greater than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level and no report of SNAP, WIC, or Head Start enrollment
* Does not have access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
* Does not have an active e-mail account or is not able or willing to create an e-mail account
* Has participated in CSA in the past three years
* Not able or willing to purchase the 50% CO-CSA share
* Not able or willing to attend CSA-tailored education sessions
* Not able or willing to make a firm commitment to three years of participation (for 2016 enrollment) or two years of participation (2017 enrollment), with timing of the off-set benefit determined by randomization
* Not able or willing to complete baseline survey
* Not able or willing to pay deposit to farm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Vermont

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Evergreen State College

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rebecca A. Seguin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cornell University

Karla Hanson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cornell University

Jane Kolodinsky, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont

Marilyn Sitaker, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Evergreen State College

Alice Ammerman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Stephanie Jilcott-Pitts, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

East Carolina University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barker

Barker, New York, United States

Site Status

Corning

Corning, New York, United States

Site Status

Gasport

Gasport, New York, United States

Site Status

Lockport

Lockport, New York, United States

Site Status

Medina

Medina, New York, United States

Site Status

Newfane

Newfane, New York, United States

Site Status

Watertown

Watertown, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pittsboro

Pittsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Siler City

Siler City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol

Bristol, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Burlington

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Burlington

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Cuttingsville

Cuttingsville, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Hinesburg

Hinesburg, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Ludlow

Ludlow, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Rutland

Rutland, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Rutland

Rutland, Vermont, United States

Site Status

South Burlington

South Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Starksboro

Starksboro, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Starksboro

Starksboro, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Vergennes

Vergennes, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Winooski

Winooski, Vermont, United States

Site Status

La Conner

La Conner, Washington, United States

Site Status

Mount Vernon

Mount Vernon, Washington, United States

Site Status

Olympia

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Rochester

Rochester, Washington, United States

Site Status

Sedro Woolley

Sedro-Woolley, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garner JA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker MH, Ammerman AS, Kenkel D, Seguin-Fowler RA. Cost analysis and cost effectiveness of a subsidized community supported agriculture intervention for low-income families. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 10;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01481-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37430305 (View on PubMed)

Seguin-Fowler RA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Ammerman AS, Marshall GA, Belarmino EH, Garner JA, Wang W. Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01168-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34461931 (View on PubMed)

Lu I, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Ammerman AS, Sitaker M, Wang W, Volpe LC, Belarmino EH, Garner J, Gonsalves L, Seguin RA. Perceptions of nutrition education classes offered in conjunction with a community-supported agriculture intervention among low-income families. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3028-3036. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002773. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32830626 (View on PubMed)

Seguin RA, Morgan EH, Hanson KL, Ammerman AS, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Becot FA, Connor LM, Garner JA, McGuirt JT. Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK): An innovative community supported agriculture intervention to prevent childhood obesity in low-income families and strengthen local agricultural economies. BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4202-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28390403 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-68001-23230

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB #: 1501005266

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Medically Tailored Meals for Kids
NCT06814795 RECRUITING NA
Pediatric Healthy Weight Clinic
NCT05020314 COMPLETED NA