Global rEgistry on decongestioN Therapy Using Less invasivE UltraFiltration

NCT ID: NCT02769351

Last Updated: 2021-08-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-03

Study Completion Date

2019-03-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients with advanced volume overload, minimally invasive ultrafiltration treatment in the acute phase can have a positive effect on clinical outcome. The aim is to collect treatment data in the context of a prospective registry of the safety and performance of minimally invasive ultrafiltration. The data will be recorded via an electronic case report form (eCRF); the eCRF runs on a server located in Germany and complies with current data protection regulations. It is intended to include about 300-500 patients with advanced volume overload at a minimum of 10 sites. In addition, data on a disease management programme (in-body measurement and home monitoring) will be recorded in up to 40 of these patients. The treatment data from each patient will be recorded over 12 months. An interim analysis will be performed after 150 patients have been observed for 6 months. The knowledge about ultrafiltration in volume overload obtained from the registry, in some cases in combination with a disease management programme, is intended to improve the body of evidence. In addition, the data will be used for hypothesis generation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There may be various reasons why an increased accumulation of fluid occurs in tissue. The most common causes include heart failure, kidney failure or cirrhosis of the liver. In rare cases, oedema can develop following septicaemia. The usual treatment of oedema involves diuretics, i.e. water tablets, which remove excess fluid from the body and which can be administered either orally or intravenously. For some years now, it has also been possible to use ultrafiltration to treat oedema. This involves filtering and removing excess fluid from the blood. This individual method enables a precisely defined amount of fluid to be withdrawn. Access to the blood circulation is usually via a central venous catheter, as in acute dialysis. Current international treatment guidelines recommend that consideration should be given to ultrafiltration therapy in the context of treatment of diuretic-resistant volume overload (e.g. second- or third-line therapy for acute decompensated heart failure). There are, however, to date no clinical data on a combined treatment regimen of diuretics and supportive ultrafiltration. Accordingly, ultrafiltration may be included in clinical guidelines either only with a low level of evidence (e.g. IIb in the ACCF/AHA guidelines) or not at all (ESC guidelines). The main reasons for the limited body of evidence for ultrafiltration are, on the one hand, the invasive nature of the usual procedures (these usually require the insertion of a central venous catheter) and structural barriers in the health system (ultrafiltration is normally offered by nephrologists and not by cardiologists). With an increasing clinical need and limited medical alternatives, particularly in view of the frequently occurring diuretic resistance in heart failure, there is an urgent medical need to fill this gap in evaluation evidence. In the context of the registry, the CHIARA system, a minimally invasive (i.e. via a peripheral venous access) extracorporeal ultrafiltration system, is used for the treatment of decompensated volume overload. The CHIARA system has a CE mark for the intended purpose of ultrafiltration of the blood of patients suffering from heart failure, acute or chronic renal failure or excess body fluid. It is planned to use the medical device in connection with this intended purpose only. In participating hospitals, patients will be treated with this new treatment strategy of minimally invasive ultrafiltration treatment in support of diuretic drug therapy in the acute phase of volume overload. It is possible with the use of ultrafiltration therapy to control volume overload and reduce it on an individual basis, so that diuretics can be given sparingly and, as a consequence, diuretic resistance and a deterioration of renal function due to diuretic uptitration can be avoided.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Heart Failure Cardiac Decompensation Volume Overload

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration

Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration

periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration

Intervention Type DEVICE

ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration

ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ultrafiltration

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥18 years
* Inpatient-treated patients with acute volume overload, preferably in association with cardiac decompensation with signs of incipient diuretic resistance (lack of increase in urine output despite significant escalation of diuretic therapy; e.g. ≥80 mg furosemide / 24 h or less than 1375 mL urine output/40 mg furosemide per 24 h or equivalent dose of other loop diuretics \[established clinically or from the medical history\])
* New York Association Functional Class (NYHA) III-IV at inclusion
* Systolic or diastolic cardiac dysfunction (HF-REF or HF-PEF)
* Adequate venous access (preferably peripheral arm vein) allowing a flow rate ≥ 60 mL / min
* Written consent to the use of data in the registry (where necessary, by a legal guardian).

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to anticoagulation (e.g. known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, severe bleeding)
* Terminal renal failure (stage V, GFR \<15 mL)
* Cardiogenic shock, e.g. in association with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
* Other diseases or factors that, in the study doctor's opinion, constitute a potential contraindication to ultrafiltration
* Pregnant women, women in labour, breast-feeding women or women of childbearing potential, who are without adequate contraception or are planning a family. NB: a pregnancy test is performed systematically in women of childbearing age and the patient is not included in the event of pregnancy (positive test). It is absolutely essential that women, who have a negative test and who are included in the study, have an effective contraception.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henning T Baberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Helios Klinik für Herzchirurgie GmbH Karlsruhe

Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Mannheim

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Stuttgart

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig

Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Helios Klinikum Hildesheim

Hildesheim, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Uniklinik RWTH Aachen

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Helios Klinik Attendorn

Attendorn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Helios Klinikum Duisburg

Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt

Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Falun Hospital

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

SUS Skanes University Hosptal

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

University Hospital Örebro

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Danderyd University Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala University Hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Kantonsspital Aarau

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

UniversitätsSpital Zurich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Sweden Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23747642 (View on PubMed)

McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology; Bax JJ, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, Dean V, Deaton C, Fagard R, Funck-Brentano C, Hasdai D, Hoes A, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, McDonagh T, Moulin C, Popescu BA, Reiner Z, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Vahanian A, Windecker S, McDonagh T, Sechtem U, Bonet LA, Avraamides P, Ben Lamin HA, Brignole M, Coca A, Cowburn P, Dargie H, Elliott P, Flachskampf FA, Guida GF, Hardman S, Iung B, Merkely B, Mueller C, Nanas JN, Nielsen OW, Orn S, Parissis JT, Ponikowski P; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Aug;14(8):803-69. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs105. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22828712 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DRKS00009836

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UF-HF-01-INT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.