Trial Outcomes & Findings for Global rEgistry on decongestioN Therapy Using Less invasivE UltraFiltration (NCT NCT02769351)
NCT ID: NCT02769351
Last Updated: 2021-08-05
Results Overview
The number of rehospitalizations due to heart failure resp. volume overload has been measured as a clinical endpoint and analyzed based on the AP.
TERMINATED
104 participants
12 months
2021-08-05
Participant Flow
Out of 104 patients recruited, 46 patients have been included in the safety population (SP; all patients included in analysis), and 44 patients have been included in the analysis population (AP; patients included in analysis with at least one ultrafiltration treatment).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
42
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=44 Participants
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
74.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76 • n=42 Participants • Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=42 Participants • Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
28 Participants
n=42 Participants • Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
|
|
Weight, Continuous
|
90.19 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.16 • n=42 Participants • Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
|
|
Height, Continuous
|
171.93 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.30 • n=41 Participants • Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
|
|
Body-Mass-Index (BMI), Continuous
|
30.03 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.10 • n=41 Participants • Baseline characteristics have been analyzed based on the analysis population.However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per variable.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: The outcome has been analyzed based on the AP (44 patients).
The number of rehospitalizations due to heart failure resp. volume overload has been measured as a clinical endpoint and analyzed based on the AP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=44 Participants
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Rehospitalisation (Yes/no) Due to Exacerbation of Heart Failure/Volume Overload of Other Origin
Rehospitalization due to Heart Failure
|
7 Rehospitalizations
|
|
Rehospitalisation (Yes/no) Due to Exacerbation of Heart Failure/Volume Overload of Other Origin
Rehospitalization due to other reasons
|
12 Rehospitalizations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Recruitment; Discharge from Index Hospitalization; Outpatient visit I (3-9 months); Outpatient visit II ( 12 months)Population: The outcome has been analyzed on the SP (46 patients). However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per time point.
Significant deterioration of kidney function has been measured as a safety endpoint and analyzed based on the SP. The variables have been measured at recruitment, discharge from the index hospitalization, Outpatient visit I (3-9 months) and Outpatient visit II (12 months).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=46 Participants
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Creatinine
Creatinine at Recruitment
|
208.30 mg/L
Standard Deviation 71.79
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Creatinine
Creatinine at Discharge from Index Hospitalization
|
180.66 mg/L
Standard Deviation 78.13
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Creatinine
Creatinine at Outpatient visit I
|
224.99 mg/L
Standard Deviation 162.7
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Creatinine
Creatinine at Outpatient visit II
|
430.31 mg/L
Standard Deviation 454.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Recruitment; Discharge from Index Hospitalization; Outpatient visit I (3-6 months); Outpatient visit II (12 months)Population: The outcome has been analyzed on the SP (46 patients). However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per time point and variable.
Significant deterioration of kidney function has been measured as a safety endpoint and analyzed based on the SP. The variables have been measured at recruitment, discharge from the index hospitalization, Outpatient visit I (3-9 months) and Outpatient visit II (12 months).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=46 Participants
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Urea
Urea at Recruitment
|
21.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 15.01
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Urea
Urea at Discharge from Index Hospitalization
|
51.67 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 168.40
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Urea
Urea at Outpatient visit I
|
282.99 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 457.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Recruitment, Discharge from index hospitalization, Outapteint visit I (3-6 months), Outpatient visit II (12 months)Population: The outcome has been analyzed on the SP (46 patients). However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per time point and variable.
Significant deterioration of kidney function has been measured as a safety endpoint and analyzed based on the SP. The variables have been measured at recruitment, discharge from the index hospitalization, Outpatient visit I (3-9 months) and Outpatient visit II (12 months).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=46 Participants
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
eGFR at Recruitment
|
28.58 mL/min*1.73^2
Standard Deviation 15.56
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
eGFR at Discharge from Index hositalization
|
37.82 mL/min*1.73^2
Standard Deviation 24.48
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
eGFR at Outaptient visit I
|
36.19 mL/min*1.73^2
Standard Deviation 30.87
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
eGFR at Outpatient visit II
|
41.52 mL/min*1.73^2
Standard Deviation 52.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: recruitment, discharge from the index hospitalization, Outpatient visit I (3-9 months), Outpatient visit II (12 months)Population: The outcome has been analyzed on the SP (46 patients). However, due to the observational character of the study, data are not always available for all patients. The actual number of patients with available data is depicted per time point and variable.
Significant deterioration of kidney function has been measured as a safety endpoint and analyzed based on the SP. The variables have been measured at recruitment, discharge from the index hospitalization, Outpatient visit I (3-9 months) and Outpatient visit II (12 months).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=46 Participants
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Cystatin
Cystatin at Recruitment
|
2.26 mg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Cystatin
Cystatin at Discharge from index Hospitalization
|
0.09 mg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Significant Deterioration of Kidney Function - Cystatin
Cystatin at Outpatient visit II
|
6.99 mg/mL
|
Adverse Events
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=46 participants at risk
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
19.6%
9/46 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid retention
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalisation
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Palliative care
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic kidney disease
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Catheter placement
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Peritoneal catheter insertion
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Immune system disorders
Demyelinating polyneuropathy
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Periph. Minimal Invasive Ultrafiltration
n=46 participants at risk
Patients with volume overload receiving ultrafiltration
periph. minimal invasive ultrafiltration: ultrafiltration via a peripheral single-needle
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Product Issues
Thrombosis in device
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalisation
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from signing the informed consent up to 12 month after recruitment.
Adverse Event Definition has been done according to a form based on ISO 14155
|
Additional Information
Dr. Jennifer Braun
Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60