Individualized Diagnosis of Endocarditis and Its Therapy With a Focus on Infected Prosthetic materiAL
NCT ID: NCT02759978
Last Updated: 2020-03-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-05-31
2023-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Value of 99mTc-Leukoscan® Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Infectious Endocarditis on Surgical Materials
NCT03112356
Diagnostic Yield of Cardiac CT to Detect Cardiac Thrombi in Acute Ischemic Stroke: an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
NCT07165093
Prospective Cohort Study of Patients With Infective Endocarditis at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
NCT04992923
Belgian Infective Endocarditis Registry
NCT06745440
How to Improve Diagnosis in Infective Endocarditis
NCT00524212
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a frequent and serious complication of implanted intracardiac prosthetic material, with a high morbidity and mortality. The number of procedures where prosthetic material is implanted in the heart increases, as do the age and comorbidity of treated subjects. In current clinical practice diagnosis of infected intracardiac prosthetic material is often difficult because of the lack of sensitivity of the available diagnostic armamentarium for IE.
As a general rule, first line treatment of intracardiac prosthetic material related endocarditis consists of surgical prosthesis removal, combined with appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The exception encompasses uncomplicated prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). PVE actually has a fair chance of successful medical treatment alone (\>50%), depending on the causative micro-organism. Although there is evidence and consensus with regard to the first line treatment, surgical removal is not always possible because of its associated high risk, technical limitations, or unwillingness of patients to undergo an invasive surgical procedure. Second and third line treatments do not include surgery, and consist of antimicrobial therapy with biofilm-penetrating agents during a predetermined timespan (second line) or as life-long suppressive antimicrobial therapy (third line). These treatments are the alternative in situations wherein first line treatment is not feasible or is unwanted. Although not extensively investigated, these treatments are considered suboptimal.
Therefore further research is necessary. More research is needed to diagnose IE more accurate and prompt, as current diagnostic criteria (the modified Duke criteria) for IE are insufficient and as it is unclear how to best allocate non-invasive imaging techniques, especially for intracardiac prosthetic material. More research is also needed to verify the indications for and optimize the use of second and third line treatments in patients with intracardiac prosthetic material.
Objectives
Primary
To define the diagnostic value of the combination of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography angiography (ECG-gated MD-CTA) in patients suspected of IE, in particular those with intracardiac prosthetic material, when added to the standard diagnostic work-up for IE.
Secondary
* To define the predictive value of MD-CTA and 18F-FDG PET with regard to relapse rate and mortality of IE;
* To identify sources of false positive and false negative results in MD-CTA and 18F-FDG PET (e.g. the effect of the use of antimicrobial therapy on imaging findings);
* To identify the best MD-CTA and 18F-FDG PET scanning protocol;
* To define the role of 18F-FDG PET for finding other infectious lesions in the body;
* To assess and compare current clinical practices in patients with intracardiac prosthetic material related infection when the foreign material cannot be removed; to determine the outcomes of second and third line treatment as compared with first line treatment, and to determine predictors of outcome;
* To investigate the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to improve the antimicrobial therapy in patients suspected of IE, in particular those with intracardiac prosthetic material:
* for which peak and through blood concentrations should be aimed at in IE for flucloxacillin, rifampicin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, penicillin; fluconazole, flucytosine, amphotericin-B?
* for which peak blood concentrations should be aimed at for gentamicin in IE?
* for which peak and through blood concentrations should be aimed at for vancomycin in intracardiac prosthetic material related IE?
* for which through blood concentrations should be aimed at in IE for voriconazole?
* To investigate antimicrobial concentrations in resected cardiac tissue (e.g. heart valve or vegetation which has been removed based on medical indication) in patients with IE who have been treated medically with antimicrobials and who subsequently are operated upon.
Study design
Prospective multicentre observation study, with the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) in Groningen as the leading centre.
Study population
Patients (≥18 years) in which IE is suspected according to the britisch society for antimicrobial chemotherapy (BSAC) criteria 2012.
Main study parameters/endpoints
Number of clinically identified (prosthetic material related) endocarditis episodes, according to (multiple) constellation(s) of diagnostic criteria versus number of "true" (prosthetic material related) endocarditis episodes, according to our gold standard "expert opinion after 12 months (+/- 2 weeks) follow-up" (based on clinical reasoning, the modified Duke criteria, and findings during surgery and from pathology).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suspicion NVE
Patients with suspicion of native valve endocarditis, infective endocarditis and no intracardiac prosthetic material in situ
diagnostic workup
Our primary objective is to test whether the proportion of patients diagnosed correctly with the use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, MD-CTA, and 18F-FDG-PET/MD-CTA added to the gold standard in current clinical practice, the modified Duke criteria by Li et al. 2000, is significantly higher as compared with the modified Duke criteria on itself. The gold standard is clinical judgement after clinical follow-up by a multidisciplinary team with medical specialists.
Suspicion (PVE)
Patients with a suspicion of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), infective endocarditis and one or more prosthetic valves in situ
diagnostic workup
Our primary objective is to test whether the proportion of patients diagnosed correctly with the use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, MD-CTA, and 18F-FDG-PET/MD-CTA added to the gold standard in current clinical practice, the modified Duke criteria by Li et al. 2000, is significantly higher as compared with the modified Duke criteria on itself. The gold standard is clinical judgement after clinical follow-up by a multidisciplinary team with medical specialists.
Suspicion pacemaker/ICD related endocarditis
Patients with a suspicion of infective endocarditis and a pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in situ
diagnostic workup
Our primary objective is to test whether the proportion of patients diagnosed correctly with the use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, MD-CTA, and 18F-FDG-PET/MD-CTA added to the gold standard in current clinical practice, the modified Duke criteria by Li et al. 2000, is significantly higher as compared with the modified Duke criteria on itself. The gold standard is clinical judgement after clinical follow-up by a multidisciplinary team with medical specialists.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
diagnostic workup
Our primary objective is to test whether the proportion of patients diagnosed correctly with the use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, MD-CTA, and 18F-FDG-PET/MD-CTA added to the gold standard in current clinical practice, the modified Duke criteria by Li et al. 2000, is significantly higher as compared with the modified Duke criteria on itself. The gold standard is clinical judgement after clinical follow-up by a multidisciplinary team with medical specialists.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age ≥18 years
* BSAC-criteria 2012: suspicion of infective endocarditis, retained in the differential diagnosis after clinical reasoning, without alternative diagnosis
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bhanu Sinha, MD, PhD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bhanu Sinha, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M16.189348
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.