Comparing PCCT With ICA and IVUS in Detecting Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
NCT ID: NCT07020039
Last Updated: 2025-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-01
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A new technique, photon-counting computed tomography, has now been developed and may potentially replace both traditional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. In this study, we aim to investigate how well this method works in diagnosing coronary artery changes compared to the established methods.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MDCT of the Coronary Arteries in Heart Transplanted Patients
NCT00403299
Ultra-high-resolution CT vs. Conventional Angiography for Detecting Coronary Heart Disease
NCT04272060
Coronary Artery Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients
NCT03231371
Should we Avoid Performing Invasive Coronary Angiography Before Cardiac Surgery in ACHD Patients?
NCT06775639
Assessing the Efficacy of CardiOGoniometry (CGM) to Localise the Culprit Vessel in Mixed Vessel Disease Non-ST elevatIon Myocardial infarcTION (NSTEMI)
NCT02803931
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard for diagnosing CAV, while intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can be considered as the gold standard for the assessment of intimal thickening and plaque burden. Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) represents a novel, non-invasive imaging modality with superior spatial resolution and tissue contrast compared to conventional CT systems.
A systematic comparison of PCCT with ICA and IVUS for detecting CAV has not yet been performed. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy, clinical relevance, and cost-effectiveness of PCCT in comparison to ICA and IVUS. By evaluating the advantages and limitations of non-invasive versus invasive modalities, the study seeks to define the optimal surveillance strategy for CAV, ultimately guiding the management of heart transplant recipients and improving long-term outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinically stable and scheduled for routine ICA.
* Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Renal insufficiency with eGFR \< 30 ml/min/m2
* Other contraindications for PCCT, ICA, or IVUS
* Acute cardiac events within 30 days prior to enrollment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Göteborg University
OTHER
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kristjan Karason
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kristjan Karason, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Transplant Institute
Gothenburg, Västra Götaland County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pober JS, Chih S, Kobashigawa J, Madsen JC, Tellides G. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current review and future research directions. Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Nov 22;117(13):2624-2638. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab259.
Velleca A, Shullo MA, Dhital K, Azeka E, Colvin M, DePasquale E, Farrero M, Garcia-Guereta L, Jamero G, Khush K, Lavee J, Pouch S, Patel J, Michaud CJ, Shullo MA, Schubert S, Angelini A, Carlos L, Mirabet S, Patel J, Pham M, Urschel S, Kim KH, Miyamoto S, Chih S, Daly K, Grossi P, Jennings DL, Kim IC, Lim HS, Miller T, Potena L, Velleca A, Eisen H, Bellumkonda L, Danziger-Isakov L, Dobbels F, Harkess M, Kim D, Lyster H, Peled Y, Reinhardt Z. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 May;42(5):e1-e141. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Dec 20. No abstract available.
Tavakol M, Ashraf S, Brener SJ. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Jan 1;4(1):65-93. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n1p65.
Sharma A, Cerdas MG, Reza-Soltani S, Rustagi V, Guntipalli M, Rojas Torres DS, Bhandari M, Kandel S, Teja Rayaprolu D, Hussain M. A Review of Photon-Counting Computed Tomography (PCCT) in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases. Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73119. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAVIAR 2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.