ED Overcrowding Validation Study

NCT ID: NCT02754245

Last Updated: 2017-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

55000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-14

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to externally validate a new emergency department overcrowding estimation tool (SONET) developed at John Peter Smith Health Network (JPS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In recent years, emergency department (ED) overcrowding has become more and more common in regional and tertiary referral hospitals. ED overcrowding status significantly affects ED operational efficiency, resulting in ambulance diversion, increased ED 72h return visits, patient satisfaction, and left without being seen (LWBS) rates.

Several estimation tools were derived to determine ED overcrowding status using various operational parameters such as, but not limited to, total number of ED patients, total ED admission holds, nursing staff, and patient injury severity. However, these tools cannot precisely evaluate ED overcrowding status, nor show strong correlations with ED operational inefficiency. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) is a widely used estimation tool to determine ED overcrowding status with relatively high consistency rates. However, the study was not able to evaluate interrater reliability since no standard definition of overcrowding existed.

An ED overcrowding estimation tool, SONET, was developed and internally validated at JPS and showed more consistency and accuracy when compared to estimation rates utilizing NEDOCS. All things considered, it is worthwhile to perform a survey study to determine the interrater variability between different evaluators for an ED overcrowding evaluation tool, one utilizing all possible collectible operational variables. In order to minimize the bias and further determine the accuracy of evaluating ED overcrowding status, a multi-center external validation study is warranted. This study will extend to six sites for the purpose of externally validating JPS' novel ED overcrowding estimation tool, SONET, by comparing its overcrowding estimation rates with those derived utilizing NEDOCS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emergency Department Overcrowding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

JPS

study sample at JPS included for analysis

No interventions assigned to this group

BUMC Dallas

study sample at Baylor University Medical Center Dallas included for analysis

No interventions assigned to this group

BUMC at Gardin

study sample at Baylor University Medical Center Gardin included for analysis

No interventions assigned to this group

BUMC Waxahachie

study sample at Baylor University Medical Center Waxahachie included for analysis

No interventions assigned to this group

BUMC Carrolton

study sample at Baylor University Medical Center Carrolton included for analysis

No interventions assigned to this group

BUMC McKinney

study sample at Baylor University Medical Center McKinney included for analysis

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all adult patients visiting the emergency department or urgent care clinic at any one of the six participating sites during the allocated one month time period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

JPS Health Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baylor University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baylor Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bernstein SL, Verghese V, Leung W, Lunney AT, Perez I. Development and validation of a new index to measure emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;10(9):938-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00647.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12957975 (View on PubMed)

Weiss SJ, Derlet R, Arndahl J, Ernst AA, Richards J, Fernandez-Frackelton M, Schwab R, Stair TO, Vicellio P, Levy D, Brautigan M, Johnson A, Nick TG. Estimating the degree of emergency department overcrowding in academic medical centers: results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS). Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):38-50. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14709427 (View on PubMed)

Epstein SK, Tian L. Development of an emergency department work score to predict ambulance diversion. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):421-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.081.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16581932 (View on PubMed)

McCarthy ML, Aronsky D, Jones ID, Miner JR, Band RA, Baren JM, Desmond JS, Baumlin KM, Ding R, Shesser R. The emergency department occupancy rate: a simple measure of emergency department crowding? Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):15-24, 24.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17980458 (View on PubMed)

Jones SS, Allen TL, Flottemesch TJ, Welch SJ. An independent evaluation of four quantitative emergency department crowding scales. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;13(11):1204-11. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.021. Epub 2006 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16902050 (View on PubMed)

Wang H, Robinson RD, Garrett JS, Bunch K, Huggins CA, Watson K, Daniels J, Banks B, D'Etienne JP, Zenarosa NR. Use of the SONET Score to Evaluate High Volume Emergency Department Overcrowding: A Prospective Derivation and Validation Study. Emerg Med Int. 2015;2015:401757. doi: 10.1155/2015/401757. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26167302 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

014-013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.