Implementation of Advanced Triage in the Emergency Department of Bellvitge University Hospital
NCT ID: NCT05230108
Last Updated: 2022-02-08
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
547 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2022-09-01
Study Completion Date
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study evaluates the efficacy of advanced triage in improving the quality of care outcomes of patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) united care of high complexity hospital.
There are four steps; Step 1 will consist of a concept analysis. Step 2 will include a mapping of advanced practice protocol terminologies. Step 3 will analyse the opinion of health professionals on advanced triage. In step 4: in retrospective phase, sociodemographic and clinical variables and quality indicators such as waiting time will be analysed. After that, in the prospective phase, advanced triage will be implemented and the two cohorts will be compared.
There are four steps; Step 1 will consist of a concept analysis. Step 2 will include a mapping of advanced practice protocol terminologies. Step 3 will analyse the opinion of health professionals on advanced triage. In step 4: in retrospective phase, sociodemographic and clinical variables and quality indicators such as waiting time will be analysed. After that, in the prospective phase, advanced triage will be implemented and the two cohorts will be compared.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Triage - Symptoms and Other Predictors in an All-comer Emergency Department Population
NCT05400707
Triage Risk Stratification
RECRUITING
Triage - Symptoms and Other Predictors in an All-comer Emergency Department Population; (EKBB 236/13)
NCT03892551
Triage Risk Stratification
COMPLETED
Validation of an Early Warning Score Based Triage System in the Emergency Department
NCT01243021
Critical Illness
COMPLETED
Evaluation of Trauma Team Activation Criteria
NCT01771861
Trauma
Injuries
COMPLETED
Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Methods for Identifying Patients At High Risk of Worsening in the Adult Emergency Department
NCT05813431
Non-traumatic Medical Emergency
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
STEP 1:
Study design: a concept analysis will be carried out based on a systematic analysis method by which it details and specifies the element to be studied, in this case, the Advanced Triage (AT). This study is based on the method that was outlined by Wilson (Wilson, 1969) and later evolved by Avant (Walker \& Avant, 1989). This technique consists of eleven stages: 1) isolating questions concerning the concept; 2) finding suitable answers; 3-7) developing real or invented cases; 8) determining the social context; 9) identifying the underlying emotions; 10) establishing the practical results; 11) defining the results in language that facilitates the clarification of the controversial concept. The use of this methodology provides the construction of different definitions that reach all variants of the AT concept.
STEP 2:
Study design: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective, retrospective, observational study of interobserver concordance of bidirectional cross-mapping between Architecture Terminology Interface Knowledge (ATIC), Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions \& Classification (NANDA), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). Based on the protocols of the Nurse Demand Management (NDM) for primary health care (PHC) of the Catalan Institute of Health.
Data collection: The data collector will proceed to design a form that allows the collection and connection of the three terminologies in each concept (assessment, diagnosis and intervention). The identification of these equivalences will be carried out by the participation of three nurses independently of each of the researchers. Several interobserver consensus sessions will be held according to the results of the concordance. Discrepancies will be resolved, if appropriate, through the agreement processes. To make the equivalences of the concepts included in the NDM protocols with the different languages (ATIC, NANDA, NIC and ICD-10), with trichotomous variables: Yes /No/ Partially; and nominal quantitative variables, to facilitate the understanding of the mapping, the codes representing the type of equivalence are included.
Data analysis: The collected data will be processed and checked for processing errors and analysed with EXCEL. Interobserver reliability will be calculated by considering the ratio according to the results of the three investigators and using the kappa(K) index calculation, in which the agreement is considered to be: (1) low, if (k) ≤0.20; (2) moderate, if (k) 0.21-0.40; (3) acceptable, if (K) 0.61-0.80 and (5) excellent, if (k) ≤0.81.
STEP 3 Study design: observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and prospective study of the different protocols already existing in the PHC of the Catalan Institute of Health and assess whether they are suitable for the hospital setting
Study setting: The study will be carried out in the ED of a high complexity public hospital in the southern metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain). This stage will consist of two phases:
Phase 1 (P1): a committee of experts will be formed, which will evaluate the existing protocols. Phase 2 (P2): surveys will be passed to several health professionals working in the ED of a high complexity hospital, in order to know their opinion about the AT.
Participants: In Phase 1, it will consist of 12 healthcare professionals (8 nurses and 4 doctors) who will work in the ED of a high complexity hospital. In Phase 2, the study population will be all healthcare professionals who work in the ED in an assisting or management capacity in a high complexity hospital.
Selection criteria:
Inclusion criteria: nurses and physicians, assistants and managers of the emergency departments of public hospitals in Catalonia.
Exclusion criteria: Auxiliary nursing care technicians, orderlies, nurses and administrative staff.
Sample size (phase 2):Starting from a maximum indeterminacy with an expected proportion (p)= 0.05, a 95% confidence interval (α=0.05) and a precision (y)=0.05. The number of professionals to be included will be 385. Assuming 15% of possible losses, the corrected sample formula will be applied, which gives a total sample of 490 individuals. The sampling technique in this phase will be non-probabilistic consecutive sampling.
Data collection: the variables for phase 1 and phase 2 of stpe 3 will be the usefulness and applicability of the NDM, protocols by the hospital AT and two lines will be considered: the first, the evaluation of the perception of usefulness and the second, of applicability by the healthcare professionals, from the two phases.
Perception of usefulness: (phases 1 and phases 2) professionals' impression and assessment of the correctness and advantages of each of the 33 protocols of the NDM by the AT. This variable is measured on a qualitative ordinal scale: 0 to 10, where 0 feels totally disagree and 10 feels totally agree.
Perception of applicability: (phases 1 and phases 2) practitioners' impression and assessment of the adaptability and feasibility of each of the 33 NDM protocols by AT. This variable is measured with an ordinal qualitative scale: 0 to 10, feeling 0 strongly disagree and 10 strongly agree.
Secondary variables: (phases 2) years of experience, professional groups, beliefs about nursing professional domains, knowledge about AT and opinion about AT.
The data collection in phase 1 will be carried out on the basis of grids, where the 33 protocols of the NDM will be analysed. In each protocol, 12 questions will have to be analysed. In phase 2, a questionnaire consisting of four blocks will be administered: (1) socio-demographic data will be asked; (2) knowledge of the AT will be asked; (3) the opinion held by the different health professionals will be asked; (4) nursing competences will be asked.
Data analysis: qualitative variables will be described by proportions, calculating 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative variables will be described with mean and median as measures of centrality, and standard deviation and interquartile range as measures of dispersion.The normality of the distribution of the quantitative variables will be checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test pot, and the parametric and non-parametric pots indicated in each case in the bivariate analysis will be applied; normally, the most commonly used pots will be the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the Student's t and Pearson's correlation-regression pots. Finally, multivariate analysis will include logistic regression techniques. P-values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
STEP 4:
Study design: quasi-experimental study consisting of 2 phases: phase 1 (retrospective control) and phase 2 (prospective intervention), where the AT will be implemented based on the advanced nurse practitioner's.
Study setting: the scope of the study will be the ED of a highly complex hospital in a centre in Catalonia (northeastern Spain), which serves as a community reference for 201,192 inhabitants of Hospitalet and Prat de Llobregat and is a reference centre for processes requiring high technology for more than 2 million inhabitants of the South Metropolitan area, Camp de Tarragona and Terres de l'Ebre. Outpatient ED of a tertiary-care centre in Catalonia (Northeast Spain), which serves as a referral centre for community reference of 201,192 people in the Southern Metropolitan Area of Barcelona.
In both phases, all adult patients (\>18 years) who will visit the hospital ED and who will be classified with priority levels III, IV or V on the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) scale will be eligible to participate in the study.
Procedure and interventions:
Control group will apply the usual care of the service and will be analysed: (a) quality indicators specific to triage; (b) cluster; (c) satisfaction; (c) pain; (d) waiting time. This part of the study will allow us to gain a better understanding of the reality of ED care. In relation to the level of urgency and its complexity, allowing us to establish the digital footprint. In order to be able to compare them with each other.
Data analysis: qualitative variables will be described by proportions, calculating 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative variables will be described with mean and median as measures of centrality, and standard deviation and interquartile range as measures of dispersion. The normality of the distribution of quantitative variables will be checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the parametric and non-parametric pots indicated in each case in the bivariate analysis will be applied; normally, the most commonly used pots will be the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the Student's t and Pearson's correlation-regression pots. Finally, multivariate analysis will include logistic regression techniques. P-values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All data will be analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v26.0 software.
The final results will be used to design the hospital ED TA implementation programme.
Study design: a concept analysis will be carried out based on a systematic analysis method by which it details and specifies the element to be studied, in this case, the Advanced Triage (AT). This study is based on the method that was outlined by Wilson (Wilson, 1969) and later evolved by Avant (Walker \& Avant, 1989). This technique consists of eleven stages: 1) isolating questions concerning the concept; 2) finding suitable answers; 3-7) developing real or invented cases; 8) determining the social context; 9) identifying the underlying emotions; 10) establishing the practical results; 11) defining the results in language that facilitates the clarification of the controversial concept. The use of this methodology provides the construction of different definitions that reach all variants of the AT concept.
STEP 2:
Study design: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective, retrospective, observational study of interobserver concordance of bidirectional cross-mapping between Architecture Terminology Interface Knowledge (ATIC), Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions \& Classification (NANDA), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). Based on the protocols of the Nurse Demand Management (NDM) for primary health care (PHC) of the Catalan Institute of Health.
Data collection: The data collector will proceed to design a form that allows the collection and connection of the three terminologies in each concept (assessment, diagnosis and intervention). The identification of these equivalences will be carried out by the participation of three nurses independently of each of the researchers. Several interobserver consensus sessions will be held according to the results of the concordance. Discrepancies will be resolved, if appropriate, through the agreement processes. To make the equivalences of the concepts included in the NDM protocols with the different languages (ATIC, NANDA, NIC and ICD-10), with trichotomous variables: Yes /No/ Partially; and nominal quantitative variables, to facilitate the understanding of the mapping, the codes representing the type of equivalence are included.
Data analysis: The collected data will be processed and checked for processing errors and analysed with EXCEL. Interobserver reliability will be calculated by considering the ratio according to the results of the three investigators and using the kappa(K) index calculation, in which the agreement is considered to be: (1) low, if (k) ≤0.20; (2) moderate, if (k) 0.21-0.40; (3) acceptable, if (K) 0.61-0.80 and (5) excellent, if (k) ≤0.81.
STEP 3 Study design: observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and prospective study of the different protocols already existing in the PHC of the Catalan Institute of Health and assess whether they are suitable for the hospital setting
Study setting: The study will be carried out in the ED of a high complexity public hospital in the southern metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain). This stage will consist of two phases:
Phase 1 (P1): a committee of experts will be formed, which will evaluate the existing protocols. Phase 2 (P2): surveys will be passed to several health professionals working in the ED of a high complexity hospital, in order to know their opinion about the AT.
Participants: In Phase 1, it will consist of 12 healthcare professionals (8 nurses and 4 doctors) who will work in the ED of a high complexity hospital. In Phase 2, the study population will be all healthcare professionals who work in the ED in an assisting or management capacity in a high complexity hospital.
Selection criteria:
Inclusion criteria: nurses and physicians, assistants and managers of the emergency departments of public hospitals in Catalonia.
Exclusion criteria: Auxiliary nursing care technicians, orderlies, nurses and administrative staff.
Sample size (phase 2):Starting from a maximum indeterminacy with an expected proportion (p)= 0.05, a 95% confidence interval (α=0.05) and a precision (y)=0.05. The number of professionals to be included will be 385. Assuming 15% of possible losses, the corrected sample formula will be applied, which gives a total sample of 490 individuals. The sampling technique in this phase will be non-probabilistic consecutive sampling.
Data collection: the variables for phase 1 and phase 2 of stpe 3 will be the usefulness and applicability of the NDM, protocols by the hospital AT and two lines will be considered: the first, the evaluation of the perception of usefulness and the second, of applicability by the healthcare professionals, from the two phases.
Perception of usefulness: (phases 1 and phases 2) professionals' impression and assessment of the correctness and advantages of each of the 33 protocols of the NDM by the AT. This variable is measured on a qualitative ordinal scale: 0 to 10, where 0 feels totally disagree and 10 feels totally agree.
Perception of applicability: (phases 1 and phases 2) practitioners' impression and assessment of the adaptability and feasibility of each of the 33 NDM protocols by AT. This variable is measured with an ordinal qualitative scale: 0 to 10, feeling 0 strongly disagree and 10 strongly agree.
Secondary variables: (phases 2) years of experience, professional groups, beliefs about nursing professional domains, knowledge about AT and opinion about AT.
The data collection in phase 1 will be carried out on the basis of grids, where the 33 protocols of the NDM will be analysed. In each protocol, 12 questions will have to be analysed. In phase 2, a questionnaire consisting of four blocks will be administered: (1) socio-demographic data will be asked; (2) knowledge of the AT will be asked; (3) the opinion held by the different health professionals will be asked; (4) nursing competences will be asked.
Data analysis: qualitative variables will be described by proportions, calculating 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative variables will be described with mean and median as measures of centrality, and standard deviation and interquartile range as measures of dispersion.The normality of the distribution of the quantitative variables will be checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test pot, and the parametric and non-parametric pots indicated in each case in the bivariate analysis will be applied; normally, the most commonly used pots will be the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the Student's t and Pearson's correlation-regression pots. Finally, multivariate analysis will include logistic regression techniques. P-values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
STEP 4:
Study design: quasi-experimental study consisting of 2 phases: phase 1 (retrospective control) and phase 2 (prospective intervention), where the AT will be implemented based on the advanced nurse practitioner's.
Study setting: the scope of the study will be the ED of a highly complex hospital in a centre in Catalonia (northeastern Spain), which serves as a community reference for 201,192 inhabitants of Hospitalet and Prat de Llobregat and is a reference centre for processes requiring high technology for more than 2 million inhabitants of the South Metropolitan area, Camp de Tarragona and Terres de l'Ebre. Outpatient ED of a tertiary-care centre in Catalonia (Northeast Spain), which serves as a referral centre for community reference of 201,192 people in the Southern Metropolitan Area of Barcelona.
In both phases, all adult patients (\>18 years) who will visit the hospital ED and who will be classified with priority levels III, IV or V on the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) scale will be eligible to participate in the study.
Procedure and interventions:
Control group will apply the usual care of the service and will be analysed: (a) quality indicators specific to triage; (b) cluster; (c) satisfaction; (c) pain; (d) waiting time. This part of the study will allow us to gain a better understanding of the reality of ED care. In relation to the level of urgency and its complexity, allowing us to establish the digital footprint. In order to be able to compare them with each other.
Data analysis: qualitative variables will be described by proportions, calculating 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative variables will be described with mean and median as measures of centrality, and standard deviation and interquartile range as measures of dispersion. The normality of the distribution of quantitative variables will be checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the parametric and non-parametric pots indicated in each case in the bivariate analysis will be applied; normally, the most commonly used pots will be the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the Student's t and Pearson's correlation-regression pots. Finally, multivariate analysis will include logistic regression techniques. P-values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All data will be analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v26.0 software.
The final results will be used to design the hospital ED TA implementation programme.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Nurse's Scope of Practice
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
The fourth step is a quasi-experimental study consisting of two phases: the first, a retrospective control phase, and the second, a prospective intervention phase in which advanced triage will be implemented. In phase 1, control, quality of care indicators will be assessed, based on quality indicators in the emergency department, waiting time and satisfaction, and the level of pain. In addition, different epidemiological, socio-cultural and clinical variables will be measured. In phase 2, the intervention phase, advanced triage will be implemented based on advanced practices nurse and the indicators of quality of care and pain will be assessed.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phase 1 (F1): retrospective control.
Phase 1, retrospective, will include all patients who attended the ED from January 2018 to December 2022.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Phase (F2): prospective intervention of Advanced Triage
Phase 2, prospective, where advanced triage based on advanced practice nurse will be implemented. Will include patients from January 2023 to December 2024.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Advanced Triage
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Advanced triage is an intervention that allows the emergency nurse to resolve health problems of low clinical complexity. All actions are aimed at resolving a health problem based on a protocol previously agreed upon by a multidisciplinary team.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Advanced Triage
Advanced triage is an intervention that allows the emergency nurse to resolve health problems of low clinical complexity. All actions are aimed at resolving a health problem based on a protocol previously agreed upon by a multidisciplinary team.
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Advanced triage is part of advanced practice nurse (APN).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* over 18 years of age, admitted to EDs classified with Emergency Severity Index (ESI) severity levels III, IV and V.
Exclusion Criteria
* patients over 70 years of age
* pregnant women
* patients with a Glasgow Glasgow score of less than 15
* patients with more than 3 chronic pathologies and/or 1 complex chronic
* disease or patients reconsulting the ED for the same reason for consultation.
* pregnant women
* patients with a Glasgow Glasgow score of less than 15
* patients with more than 3 chronic pathologies and/or 1 complex chronic
* disease or patients reconsulting the ED for the same reason for consultation.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
70 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Official Barcelona Nurses Association (COIB)
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cristina Font Cabrera
Emergency Nurse
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Spain
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Austin EE, Blakely B, Tufanaru C, Selwood A, Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R. Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 15;28(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00749-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bittencourt RJ, Stevanato AM, Braganca CTNM, Gottems LBD, O'Dwyer G. Interventions in overcrowding of emergency departments: an overview of systematic reviews. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:66. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002342. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Butti L, Bierti O, Lanfrit R, Bertolini R, Chittaro S, Delli Compagni S, Del Russo D, Mancusi RL, Pertoldi F. Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the triage emergency department nursing protocol for the management of pain. J Pain Res. 2017 Oct 16;10:2479-2488. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S138850. eCollection 2017.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hinson JS, Martinez DA, Schmitz PSK, Toerper M, Radu D, Scheulen J, Stewart de Ramirez SA, Levin S. Accuracy of emergency department triage using the Emergency Severity Index and independent predictors of under-triage and over-triage in Brazil: a retrospective cohort analysis. Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 15;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12245-017-0161-8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Innes K, Jackson D, Plummer V, Elliott D. Emergency department waiting room nurse role: A key informant perspective. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2017 Feb;20(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lauks J, Mramor B, Baumgartl K, Maier H, Nickel CH, Bingisser R. Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154372. eCollection 2016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sarria-Guerrero JA, Luaces-Cubells C, Jimenez-Fabrega FX, Villamor-Ordozgoiti A, Isla Pera P, Guix-Comellas EM. Pediatric televisits and telephone triage: impact on use of a hospital emergency department. Emergencias. 2019 Ago;31(4):257-260. English, Spanish.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Woo BFY, Lee JXY, Tam WWS. The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2017 Sep 11;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0237-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zachariasse JM, van der Hagen V, Seiger N, Mackway-Jones K, van Veen M, Moll HA. Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Font-Cabrera C, Juve-Udina ME, Galimany-Masclans J, Fabrellas N, Rosello-Novella A, Sancho-Agredano R, Adamuz J, Guix-Comellas EM. Implementation of advanced triage in the Emergency Department of high complexity public hospital: Research protocol. Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):4101-4110. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1622. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR085/20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Optimizing Triage and Hospitalisation In Adult General Medical Emergency Patients: the TRIAGE Study
NCT01768494
COMPLETED
Risk Stratification of Patients With Suspected COVID-19 Presenting to the ED
NCT05465824
COMPLETED
Implementation of the Individual Danish Emergency Process Triage
NCT04571021
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Quality of Care in the Emergency Department by Studying the Appropriateness of Hospitalizations
NCT06846879
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Usefulness of an Ultraportative Ultrasound Device in the Management of Intra Hospital Emergencies
NCT02967809
COMPLETED
Identification of the Sick Patient in the ED
NCT03209375
COMPLETED
Emergency Management in a Dedicated Respiratory Unit of Patients With a Possible COVID-19 Infection
NCT04371328
COMPLETED
Training Concepts in Emergency Ultrasonography
NCT02671201
UNKNOWN
Rapid Response Teams - How and Who?
NCT04507737
RECRUITING
NA
Application of Machine Learning Based Approaches in Emergency Department to Support Clinical Decision Managing SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients
NCT04825301
UNKNOWN
Telephone Triage Study
NCT00222001
COMPLETED
Non-medical Practitioner Workforce in the Urgent and Emergency Care System Skill-mix in England
NCT04770766
COMPLETED
Targeting of UnControlled Hypertension in Emergency Department
NCT03749499
COMPLETED
NA
Early Warning Score Combined With Bedside Assessments: Accelerating Emergency Care To Improve Prognosis
NCT07249151
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Quality of Care in the Emergency Department by Studying the Appropriateness of Admissions of Patients Accessing the Emergency Department (ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII)
NCT06345378
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Evaluation of the Quality of Care in the Emergency Department by Studying the Appropriateness of Admissions of Patients Accessing the Emergency Department (Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggione Policlinico)
NCT06345352
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Decision Support System on Emergency Triage
NCT05388292
COMPLETED
NA
Trottinettes Urgences 2019-2020
NCT04778332
COMPLETED
Triage of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT02064127
UNKNOWN
Emergency Department Triage in a Resource Constrained Setting: Application of the World Health Organization Triage Scale in Regional Papua New Guinea
NCT04098705
WITHDRAWN
NA
Risk Stratification of COVID-19 Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department
NCT04629183
COMPLETED
Initial Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department With Point-of-Care Ultrasonography
NCT02099045
UNKNOWN
NEWS and Rapid Lactate Testing for Early Identification of High Risk Patients in the Emergency Department
NCT02817581
COMPLETED
Assessment Of Different Scores In Predicting Outcome In AECOPD Patients In Emergency Department
NCT05793697
UNKNOWN
Non-Interruptive Alerts for Improving Use of Clinical Decision Rules
NCT04702308
COMPLETED
NA