Utility of the History and Physical Exam in the Emergency Department
NCT ID: NCT01154517
Last Updated: 2010-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
128 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-07-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Initial Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department With Point-of-Care Ultrasonography
NCT02099045
Abdominal Plain X-ray in the Emergency Departement
NCT02980081
Emergency Department Cardiac Ultrasound
NCT02719509
Diagnostic Performance of "Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score"
NCT05175144
Fluid Status of Outpatients With Dyspnea
NCT02111525
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is:
1. To draw a connection between time and accuracy of the history and physical exam.
2. To draw a connection between time and level of experience as a physician based on post-graduate level.
3. To assess the number of laboratory and radiographic studies and the post-graduate level.
4. To assess the relevance of the labs and radiographs ordered. (Relevance is defined as something that changes plan of care.)
Time is a critical component of the ED physician. Our study will analyse if modern medicine has created a more laboratory/image based need to ascertain a diagnosis or if history and physical examination alone can predict the ultimate diagnosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Henry Ford Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Henry Ford
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Stevenson, DO
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Henry Ford Macomb
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital
Clinton Township, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3617
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.