Dose-Finding of Propranolol in Combination With Metronomic Fixed Oral Cyclophosphamide Based on Bivariate Efficacy-tolerability Outcome in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Angiosarcoma: A Collaborative and Innovative Phase I-II Sequential Trial by the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO)

NCT ID: NCT02732678

Last Updated: 2016-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adrenergic processes stimulated by epinephrine and norepinephrine drive to the development of tumor growth and metastasis. Beta-adrenergic receptor (BAR) antagonists have shown efficacy against melanoma, breast cancer and prostate cancer. The non-specific BAR inhibitor propranolol has been used as the gold standard treatment in pediatric patients with benign infantile hemangioma which express high levels of beta adrenergic receptors potentially explaining their sensitively to propranolol. BAR have been shown to be expressed across a diverse panel of vascular tumors, with the highest expression in malignant vascular tumors including angiosarcoma. Several reports indicate positive results from beta-blockade in patients with moderately threatening vascular tumors. It remains to be determined if more malignant vascular tumor such as the angiosarcomas are susceptible to propranolol. Besides, due to the lack of adequate therapies for angiosarcoma (doxorubicin or paclitaxel and finally cyclophosphamide in third line) and to the poor prognosis of this rare and aggressive tumor, there is a strong need for the development of treatments against this tumor type. Recently using a panel of angiosarcoma cell lines. demonstrate that beta-adrenergic inhibition blocks cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in a dose dependent manner. Moreover, using in vivo tumor models they demonstrate that propanolol shows remarkable efficacy in reducing the growth of angiosarcoma tumors. Based on these proofs of mechanisms in vitro and in vivo and due to the well established safety propranolol in humans, investigators propose to determine among a wide range of propranolol dose (80 mg/d ; 120 mg/d and 160 mg/d) the optimal one based on bivariate efficacy-toxicity outcome in patients with angiosarcoma treated by cyclophosphamide. Because these two drugs have different pharmacological mechanisms, the aim is to determine the optimal dose of propranolol having the best systemic cardiovascular tolerability and the best potential antiangiogenic effect in addition with cyclophosphamide.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Angiosarcoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort of a dose of Propranolol 80 mg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PROPRANOLOL

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohort of a dose of Propranolol 120 mg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PROPRANOLOL

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohort of a dose of Propranolol 160 mg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PROPRANOLOL

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PROPRANOLOL

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adolescent \> 15 years with a body surface \>1,6 m2
* Histologically proven angiosarcoma, reviewed by an independent pathologist, with metastasis or locally advanced stage not amenable to radiotherapy or curative-intent surgery after multidisciplinary decision ;
* Prior systemic treatment with paclitaxel or doxorubicin
* At least one lesion measurable according to the RECIST, version 1.1;
* No brain or meningeal metastasis;
* No more than two prior lines of chemotherapy (whatever the indication);
* A World Health Organization performance status score ≤2;
* Neutrophils count \> 1000 /mm3, platelets count ≥100,000/mm3, hemoglobin level ≥ 8 g/Dl, liver transaminases ≤1.5 XULN, total bilirubin ≤1.5X ULN, serum creatinine≤1.5XULN, and amylase and lipase≤1.5XULN

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
* Subject with a contraindication to propranolol (ie cardiogenic shock; sinus bradycardia and greater than first-degree block; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and bronchial asthma; patients with known hypersensitivity to Propranolol; assessed by cardiovascular and pulmonary history and examinations including blood pressure, ECG; untreated Pheochromocytoma, Congestive heart failure not controlled by treatment, Prinzmetal's angina)
* Subject with Severe Raynaud Phenomena or Raynaud Disease
* Subject with Prior systemic treatment with Cyclophosphamide as 1st or 2nd line
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Urielle Desalbres

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Sébatien SALAS, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Marseill, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sébastien SALAS, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-29

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-005177-21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.