A Registry to Observe the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Under Routine Medical Care

NCT ID: NCT02236637

Last Updated: 2019-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

3050 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-14

Study Completion Date

2018-11-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this registry is to document the characteristics and management of patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in routine clinical practice, independent of treatment used. Given the rapidly evolving landscape in mCRPC treatments, there is a need for a current and improved understanding of how these treatments fit into the current treatment paradigm for mCRPC, how they are combined and sequenced, and how their relative effectiveness profiles emerge outside of a clinical trial setting. This will be based on documentation and description of sequencing of treatment initiation, termination, and duration; relative effectiveness of treatments; defined medical resource utilization (MRU) and quality-of-life parameters and follow-up for survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a non-interventional, multicenter, prospective registry of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate presenting with mCRPC, based on documented metastatic prostate cancer and documented castration resistance. Castrate-resistant prostate cancer is defined by disease progression despite testosterone \<50 ng/dL, and/or androgen deprivation therapy, and/or a history of orchiectomy, and may present as a continuous rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and/or worsening of existing disease/symptoms, and/or the appearance of new metastases. Observational methodology will be used to capture data. The decision of patients to take part in the registry will not influence their medical care. Treatment decisions will be made at the discretion of the treating physician, per routine clinical practice. Only data available from routine clinical practice will be collected. It is expected that approximately 3,000 patients will participate in this registry. To ensure a patient population representative of clinical practice and to reduce selection bias, all patients meeting the eligibility criteria at a participating site should be consecutively enrolled in the registry, irrespective of their treatment. The planned total duration of the registry will be 5.5 years from the date that the first patient is enrolled, irrespective of the country or registry site. The anticipated duration of patient enrollment is 2.5 years. The maximum duration of follow-up for individual patients in the observational period of the registry will be 3 years, regardless of when they are enrolled. The 3-year period of the observational period will document the sequencing of systemic mCRPC treatments during routine clinical practice, considering the life expectancy of patients with mCRPC in the registry. Unless specified otherwise per local regulations, all patients must give their informed consent to participate in this registry before data collection (ie, data entry into the case report form \[CRF\]) is performed. Patients will be enrolled at the time of initiation of a new systemic mCRPC treatment or during a period when a patient is considered to be in surveillance according to clinical practice. Baseline data collection will include details of the patient's prostate cancer history and prior prostate cancer treatment. This will be followed by a prospective observational period during which patients may cycle through multiple systemic mCRPC treatment periods and periods of surveillance. During the observational period, data will be collected at the following time points of a patient's course of treatment in routine clinical practice: initiation of a new systemic mCRPC treatment; termination of a systemic mCRPC treatment; when the duration of a systemic mCRPC treatment or surveillance period is \>3 months, data collection will be performed at a minimum frequency of 3-monthly intervals during that period. Survival data will be collected for all patients 3 years after their enrollment or at the close of the registry, whichever occurs first, except for those patients who withdraw their consent prior to completing the observation period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mCRPC patients

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated according to routine clinical practice

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate Patients with documented metastatic prostate cancer Patients with documented castration resistance Patients either: Initiating a new systemic mCRPC treatment; or considered to be in surveillance according to clinical practice Sign (or their legally-acceptable representatives must sign) a participation agreement or informed consent form (ICF), per local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria

Any patient who is withdrawn from the registry for any reason may not re-enter the registry
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Ostend, , Belgium

Site Status

Ottignies, , Belgium

Site Status

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Béziers, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Gap, , France

Site Status

Hyères, , France

Site Status

La Tronche, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Metz, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Périgueux, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Pringy, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Saint-Grégoire, , France

Site Status

Saint-Mandé, , France

Site Status

Saint-Quentin, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Saarow, , Germany

Site Status

Bautzen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Braunschweig, , Germany

Site Status

Chemnitz, , Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Erkrath, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Holzminden, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Kirchheim, , Germany

Site Status

Nürtingen, , Germany

Site Status

Remscheid, , Germany

Site Status

Reutlingen, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Sindelfingen, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Weiden, , Germany

Site Status

Wilhelmshaven, , Germany

Site Status

Würselen, , Germany

Site Status

Beer Yaakov, , Israel

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Luxembourg, , Luxembourg

Site Status

Niedercorn, , Luxembourg

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Poznañ, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Evora, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Setúbal, , Portugal

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Celje, , Slovenia

Site Status

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Slovenj Gradec, , Slovenia

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Asturias, , Spain

Site Status

Barakaldo Vizcaya, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Bilbao Vizcaya, , Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Langreo, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Pontevedra, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Borås, , Sweden

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Östersund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Vaxjo, , Sweden

Site Status

Västerås, , Sweden

Site Status

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Winterthur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Edirne, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kayseri, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Turkey, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ashton-under-Lyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Barnstaple, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackburn, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bradford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Brighton Sussex, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Burton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Crewe, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Huddersfield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lancaster, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds Yorks, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

N/a N/a, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Scunthorpe, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Steeton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Taunton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Torquay, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wakefield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wigan, , United Kingdom

Site Status

York, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium France Germany Israel Luxembourg Poland Portugal Russia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Verry C, Vincendeau S, Massetti M, Blachier M, Vimont A, Bazil ML, Bernardini P, Pettre S, Timsit MO. Pattern of Clinical Progression Until Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Epidemiological Study from the European Prostate Cancer Registry. Target Oncol. 2022 Jul;17(4):441-451. doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00899-6. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35841526 (View on PubMed)

Bjartell A, Lumen N, Maroto P, Paiss T, Gomez-Veiga F, Birtle A, Kramer G, Kalinka E, Spaeth D, Feyerabend S, Matveev V, Lefresne F, Lukac M, Wapenaar R, Costa L, Chowdhury S. Real-World Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Prednisolone as the First- or Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Prostate Cancer Registry. Target Oncol. 2021 May;16(3):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00807-4. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33826036 (View on PubMed)

Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, Lumen N, Maroto P, Paiss T, Gomez-Veiga F, Birtle A, Kramer G, Kalinka E, Spaeth D, Feyerabend S, Matveev V, Lefresne F, Lukac M, Wapenaar R, Costa L. Real-World Outcomes in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Prostate Cancer Registry. Target Oncol. 2020 Jun;15(3):301-315. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00720-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32500294 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

212082PCR4001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR100857

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fractionated and Multiple Dose 225Ac-J591 for Progressive mCRPC
NCT04506567 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2