Cytoreductive Prostatectomy Versus Cytoreductive Prostate Irradiation As a Local Treatment Option for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Multicentric Feasibility Trial

NCT ID: NCT03655886

Last Updated: 2025-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-15

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

According to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU), the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed mPC consists of immediate castration with the addition of docetaxel or abiraterone acetate. As seen in other well-known solid tumours - such as ovarian, colon and renal cancer - local treatment (LT) of the primary tumour could lead to a survival benefit compared to standard of care (SOC). Several retrospective studies have suggested a survival benefit of local treatment of the primary tumour with SOC versus SOC only in mPC. These patients also have less local symptoms of their disease, which has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Several prospective studies have already been set up to compare either surgery or radiotherapy with the SOC. In expectation of their results and because randomization seems challenging, the investigators want to set up a trial to evaluate the feasibility of randomization between both local treatment groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Metastatic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radical prostatectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

radical prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

can be performed either open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted, which is chosen by the discretion and expertise of the performing surgeon

Radiotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Whole pelvis radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

radiation of prostate bed and pelvis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

radical prostatectomy

can be performed either open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted, which is chosen by the discretion and expertise of the performing surgeon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Whole pelvis radiotherapy

radiation of prostate bed and pelvis

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male ≥18y
* Histologically proven PC
* Newly diagnosed metastatic PC as assessed by standard imaging (CT and bone scintigraphy) or PSMA PET-CT
* ECOG 0-1 (2 if related to local PC symptoms)
* Eligible for local treatment
* Written informed consent and able and willing to comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous systemic treatment for PC except ADT started within 3 months before randomization
* Previous radiotherapy to the pelvis interfering with prostate irradiation
* Previous surgery in the pelvis interfering with radical prostatectomy
* Symptoms related to metastatic lesions, persisting for at least 2 weeks after initiation of ADT
* Metastatic brain disease, leptomeningeal disease or imminent spinal cord compression
* Previous or current malignant disease which is likely to interfere with LoMP II treatment or assessment
* Psychological disorder intervening with understanding the information or the informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Antwerp University Hospital

Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status

AZ Jan Palfijn

Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium

Site Status

Leuven University Hospital

Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

AZ Maria Middelares

Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

Site Status

AZ Sint-Jan

Bruges, West Flanders, Belgium

Site Status

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BC-01880

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.