Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Vinorelbine As Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Did Not Respond to Hormone Therapy
NCT ID: NCT00627354
Last Updated: 2011-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying how well mitoxantrone works compared to etoposide or vinorelbine works as second-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic prostate cancer that did not respond to hormone therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Has Not Responded to Hormone Therapy
NCT00006114
Chemotherapy With or Without Biological Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Has Not Responded to Hormone Therapy
NCT00005847
Estramustine, Docetaxel, and Carboplatin for Patients With Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Progressing After Mitoxantrone-Based Chemotherapy.
NCT00183924
Paclitaxel, Topotecan, and Estramustine in Treating Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer
NCT00084565
Estramustine, Etoposide and Paclitaxel Treatment for Hormonally Responsive Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
NCT00151060
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Determine the palliative response rate in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer treated with mitoxantrone hydrochloride vs etoposide vs vinorelbine ditartrate as second-line therapy.
Secondary
* Determine the duration of palliative response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the biological response (PSA \> 50%) in these patients.
* Determine the time to progression (biological and clinical) in these patients.
* Determine the overall survival of these patients.
* Determine the quality of life and the impact on autonomy of patients over 70 years of age.
* Determine the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients receive mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 5 minutes once a week for 3 weeks.
* Arm II: Patients receive oral etoposide twice daily on days 1-14.
* Arm III: Patients receive oral vinorelbine ditartrate once daily on days 1 and 8 and oral prednisone once daily on days 1-21.
Treatment in all three arms repeats every 3 weeks for up to 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
TREATMENT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
etoposide
mitoxantrone hydrochloride
prednisone
vinorelbine tartrate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Metastatic progressive disease meeting the following criteria:
* Increase in measurable lesions \> 25%
* Increase in bone lesions \> 25%
* Biological progression rate of PSA \> 4 ng/mL
* Received docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy
* Received at least 1 prior regimen of hormone therapy
* Pain \> 2 on Visual Analog Scale or continuing level 2 analgesics
* No symptomatic or evolutionary CNS disease
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
* Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times normal
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2 times normal (unless bone metastases are present)
* Transaminases ≤ 1.5 times normal
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times normal
* No prior malignancy except basal cell skin cancer
* No peripheral neuropathy or severe neuropathy ≥ grade 2
* No other severe lung, hepatic, renal, or digestive disease that would be complicated by treatment
* LVEF \> 50%
* No history of peptic ulcer, unstable diabetes, or other contraindication to using steroids
* No severe infection requiring antibiotics
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
* More than 8 weeks since prior metabolic radiotherapy
* More than 4 weeks since prior external radiotherapy
* At least 1 month since prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy
* At least 1 month since prior antiandrogen therapy in the case of complete hormonal blockage
* No participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe D'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Florence Joly, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Centre Francois Baclesse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Regional Francois Baclesse
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GETUG- P02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
INCA-RECF0422
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EUDRACT-2006-001597-25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000574184
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.