Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Vinorelbine As Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Did Not Respond to Hormone Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00627354

Last Updated: 2011-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as mitoxantrone, etoposide, and vinorelbine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which drug is more effective in killing tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying how well mitoxantrone works compared to etoposide or vinorelbine works as second-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic prostate cancer that did not respond to hormone therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Determine the palliative response rate in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer treated with mitoxantrone hydrochloride vs etoposide vs vinorelbine ditartrate as second-line therapy.

Secondary

* Determine the duration of palliative response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the biological response (PSA \> 50%) in these patients.
* Determine the time to progression (biological and clinical) in these patients.
* Determine the overall survival of these patients.
* Determine the quality of life and the impact on autonomy of patients over 70 years of age.
* Determine the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 5 minutes once a week for 3 weeks.
* Arm II: Patients receive oral etoposide twice daily on days 1-14.
* Arm III: Patients receive oral vinorelbine ditartrate once daily on days 1 and 8 and oral prednisone once daily on days 1-21.

Treatment in all three arms repeats every 3 weeks for up to 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

vinorelbine tartrate

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate

* Metastatic progressive disease meeting the following criteria:

* Increase in measurable lesions \> 25%
* Increase in bone lesions \> 25%
* Biological progression rate of PSA \> 4 ng/mL
* Received docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy
* Received at least 1 prior regimen of hormone therapy
* Pain \> 2 on Visual Analog Scale or continuing level 2 analgesics
* No symptomatic or evolutionary CNS disease

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
* Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times normal
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2 times normal (unless bone metastases are present)
* Transaminases ≤ 1.5 times normal
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times normal
* No prior malignancy except basal cell skin cancer
* No peripheral neuropathy or severe neuropathy ≥ grade 2
* No other severe lung, hepatic, renal, or digestive disease that would be complicated by treatment
* LVEF \> 50%
* No history of peptic ulcer, unstable diabetes, or other contraindication to using steroids
* No severe infection requiring antibiotics

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* See Disease Characteristics
* More than 8 weeks since prior metabolic radiotherapy
* More than 4 weeks since prior external radiotherapy
* At least 1 month since prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy
* At least 1 month since prior antiandrogen therapy in the case of complete hormonal blockage
* No participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Groupe D'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Florence Joly, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Centre Francois Baclesse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Regional Francois Baclesse

Caen, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GETUG- P02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

INCA-RECF0422

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EUDRACT-2006-001597-25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000574184

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.