S9916, Combination Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer That Has Not Responded to Hormone Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00004001

Last Updated: 2014-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

770 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-10-31

Study Completion Date

2007-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy and hormone therapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving drugs in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether estramustine plus docetaxel is more effective than mitoxantrone plus prednisone for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of estramustine plus docetaxel with that of mitoxantrone plus prednisone in treating patients who have stage IV prostate cancer that has not responded to hormone therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with hormone-refractory, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with docetaxel and estramustine vs mitoxantrone and prednisone.
* Compare the qualitative and quantitative toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
* Compare the quality of life, including palliation of metastatic bone pain and global quality of life, of patients treated with these regimens.
* Record prostate-specific antigen values for future correlations with response and survival in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the responses in patients with bidimensionally measurable disease treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease status (measurable or evaluable disease progression vs rising PSA only), NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.X pain scale (grade 2 or greater vs less than 2), and SWOG performance status (0-1 vs 2-3). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive oral estramustine 3 times daily on days 1-5 and docetaxel IV over 1 hour on day 2.
* Arm II: Patients receive mitoxantrone IV over 30 minutes on day 1 and oral prednisone twice daily on days 1-21.

Treatment in both arms repeats every 3 weeks for a maximum of 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, after courses 4 and 8, and then at 1 year after randomization.

Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually for 1 year.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 620 patients (310 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 3.5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Docetaxel and Estramustine

Estramustine, 280 mg, PO, TID, Days 1-5; q 21 days Docetaxel, 60mg/m2, IV, Day 2; q 21 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

estramustine

Intervention Type DRUG

Mitoxantrone and Prednisone

Mitoxantrone, 12 mg/m2, IV, Day 1; q 21 days Prednisone, 5 mg, PO, BID, Days 1-21; q 21 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

mitoxantrone

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

estramustine

Intervention Type DRUG

mitoxantrone

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Unresponsive or refractory to hormonal therapy, as defined by at least 1 of the following criteria:

* Progression of bidimensionally measurable disease
* Progression of evaluable but not measurable disease (bone scan)
* At least 2 consecutive rises in PSA and a PSA level of at least 5 ng/mL
* No minimum PSA required for measurable disease or non-PSA evaluable disease
* Soft tissue disease that has been irradiated within the past 2 months is not considered measurable disease
* Prior orchiectomy OR
* Medical castration using leuprolide or goserelin

* Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy must continue during study
* Prior nonsteroidal antiandrogens (flutamide, ketoconazole, bicalutamide, or nilutamide) allowed if disease progression occurred
* No third-space fluid accumulation such as ascites or symptomatic pleural effusion
* No brain metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

* 18 and over

Performance status:

* SWOG 0-3
* Performance status 3 must be due to pain secondary to bone metastases

Life expectancy:

* Not specified

Hematopoietic:

* No hypercoagulability

Hepatic:

* Not specified

Renal:

* Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL

Cardiovascular:

* No history of myocardial infarction
* No history of congestive heart failure unless well controlled
* No history of cerebrovascular accident or atrial fibrillation
* No active thrombophlebitis
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 50% by Multi Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA) scan or 2-D echocardiogram

Pulmonary:

* No history of pulmonary embolus

Other:

* Recovered from major infections
* No other significant active medical illness
* No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or stage I or II cancer currently in complete remission

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

* At least 4 weeks since prior biologic therapy and recovered
* No more than 1 prior biologic therapy regimen
* No concurrent biological response modifiers

Chemotherapy:

* At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy and recovered
* No more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen
* No prior estramustine, taxanes, anthracyclines, or mitoxantrone
* No other concurrent chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

* See Disease Characteristics
* At least 4 weeks since prior flutamide or ketoconazole (6 weeks for bicalutamide or nilutamide)
* No concurrent corticosteroids or hormonal therapy (except megestrol for hot flashes or continuing LHRH treatment)

Radiotherapy:

* See Disease Characteristics
* Prior samarium Sm 153 lexidronam pentasodium allowed
* At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy and recovered
* No prior radiotherapy to 30% or more of bone marrow
* No prior strontium chloride Sr 89
* No concurrent radiotherapy

Surgery:

* See Disease Characteristics
* At least 3 weeks since prior surgery and recovered

Other:

* At least 4 weeks since prior bisphosphonates
* No prior anticoagulation therapy (i.e., warfarin), except aspirin
* No concurrent bisphosphonates
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer and Leukemia Group B

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Central Cancer Treatment Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

SWOG Cancer Research Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel P. Petrylak, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center

Eric J. Small, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of California, San Francisco

Patrick A. Burch, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Siouxland Hematology-Oncology

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CentraCare Health Plaza

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Medcenter One Health System

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Merit Care Hospital

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Altru Health System

Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rapid City Regional Hospital

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hussain M, Goldman B, Tangen C, Higano CS, Petrylak DP, Wilding G, Akdas AM, Small EJ, Donnelly BJ, Sundram SK, Burch PA, Dipaola RS, Crawford ED. Prostate-specific antigen progression predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trials 9346 (Intergroup Study 0162) and 9916. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2450-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9810. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19380444 (View on PubMed)

de Wit R. Chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101 Suppl 2:11-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07485.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18307687 (View on PubMed)

Goldman B, Hussain M, Tangen C, et al.: Prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (PC): data from S9346 and S9916. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Feb 14-16, 2008, San Francisco, CA. A-165, 2008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hussain MH, Goldman B, Tangen CM, et al.: Use of prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (PC): data from S9346 and S9916. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-5015, 2008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Calabro F, Sternberg CN. Current indications for chemotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2007 Jan;51(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17007996 (View on PubMed)

Chowdhury S, Burbridge S, Harper PG. Chemotherapy for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;61(12):2064-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01551.x. Epub 2007 Oct 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17956560 (View on PubMed)

Mendiratta P, Armstrong AJ, George DJ. Current standard and investigational approaches to the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 2007;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-S19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17387372 (View on PubMed)

Montgomery RB, Goldman B, Tangen CM, Hussain M, Petrylak DP, Page S, Klein EA, Crawford ED; Southwest Oncology Group. Association of body mass index with response and survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer: Southwest Oncology Group trials 8894 and 9916. J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1946-51; discussion 1951. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.026. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17868721 (View on PubMed)

Burgess EF, Roth BJ. Changing perspectives of the role of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2006 May;33(2):227-36, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2005.12.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16631461 (View on PubMed)

Lucas A, Petrylak DP. The case for early chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 2):S72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.077.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17084173 (View on PubMed)

Moss RA, Petrylak DP. Cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer: Who and when? Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006 Sep;7(5):370-7. doi: 10.1007/s11864-006-0005-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16904054 (View on PubMed)

McKeage K, Keam SJ. Docetaxel in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. Drugs. 2005;65(16):2287-94; discussion 2295-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565160-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16266195 (View on PubMed)

Moinpour CM, Donaldson GW, Nakamura Y. Chemotherapeutic impact on pain and global health-related quality of life in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: Dynamically Modified Outcomes (DYNAMO) analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res. 2009 Mar;18(2):147-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9433-3. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19130298 (View on PubMed)

Petrylak DP, Ankerst DP, Jiang CS, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, Lara PN Jr, Jones JA, Taplin ME, Burch PA, Kohli M, Benson MC, Small EJ, Raghavan D, Crawford ED. Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen declines for surrogacy in patients treated on SWOG 99-16. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Apr 19;98(8):516-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj129.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16622120 (View on PubMed)

Southwest Oncology Group; Berry DL, Moinpour CM, Jiang CS, Ankerst DP, Petrylak DP, Vinson LV, Lara PN, Jones S, Taplin ME, Burch PA, Hussain MH, Crawford ED. Quality of life and pain in advanced stage prostate cancer: results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial comparing docetaxel and estramustine to mitoxantrone and prednisone. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2828-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.8207.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16782921 (View on PubMed)

Berry DL, Moinpour CM, Jiang C, et al.: Quality of life (QOL) and pain in advanced stage prostate cancer: impact of missing data on evaluating palliation in SWOG 9916. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl 14): A-4579, 401s, 2004.

Reference Type RESULT

Crawford ED, Pauler DK, Tangen CM, et al.: Three-month change in PSA as a surrogate endpoint for mortality in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): data from Southwest Oncology Group study S9916. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl 14): A-4505, 383s, 2004.

Reference Type RESULT

Petrylak DP, Tangen C, Hussain M, et al.: SWOG 99-16: randomized phase III trial of docetaxel (D)/estramustine (E) versus mitoxantrone(M)/prednisone(p) in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPCA). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl 14): A-3, 2s, 2004.

Reference Type RESULT

Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, Lara PN Jr, Jones JA, Taplin ME, Burch PA, Berry D, Moinpour C, Kohli M, Benson MC, Small EJ, Raghavan D, Crawford ED. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041318.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15470214 (View on PubMed)

Hussain M, Petrylak D, Fisher E, Tangen C, Crawford D. Docetaxel (Taxotere) and estramustine versus mitoxantrone and prednisone for hormone-refractory prostate cancer: scientific basis and design of Southwest Oncology Group Study 9916. Semin Oncol. 1999 Oct;26(5 Suppl 17):55-60.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10604271 (View on PubMed)

Unger JM, LeBlanc M, Blanke CD. The Effect of Positive SWOG Treatment Trials on Survival of Patients With Cancer in the US Population. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1345-1351. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0762.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28586789 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S9916

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U10CA032102

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CDR0000067211

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.