Safety and Efficacy Study of of Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Estramustine in Hormone Refractory Prostatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00541281

Last Updated: 2009-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-12-31

Study Completion Date

2006-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

we propose to randomize patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer between docetaxel/estramustine/prednisone and docetaxel/prednisone in a phase II study. The principal endpoint will be the efficacy in term of PSA response.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The addition of estramustine to other chemotherapeutic agents that affect microtubule function may improve their efficacy15, 16, 17, 18. A phase III trial compared vinblastine versus the combination of vinblastine plus estramustine as treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. They showed that the association of estramustine and vinblastine was superior to vinblastine alone for time to progression, PSA response and survival (Hudes et al., ASCO 2002). In addition, Berry et al. found that estramustine/paclitaxel improved PSA response rate but not overall survival compared with paclitaxel alone (Berry et al. ASCO2001).

Similar association has been studied with docetaxel. In a phase I trial combining docetaxel and estramustine19, 53% of patients reported a decrease in narcotic use and 63% experienced a PSA response. In another phase I trial, a reduction in PSA of 50% or more was observed in 14 of 17 patients (82%)20. In a phase II trial involving 35 patients, a PSA response was reported in 74% of the patients and objective response in 4 out of 7 patients with measurable disease21. Median survival 22 months in this last study. These studies as well as other support the combination of estramustine and docetaxel in the treatment of HRPC22, 23.

Recently, Oudard et al. competed a phase II randomized study comparing mitoxantrone/prednisone versus docetaxel/estramustine prednisone24. Docetaxel was given either weekly or every 3 weeks. Association of docetaxel/estramustine was found superior to mitoxantrone in term of PSA response, (67-63% versus 18%), clinical benefit (79-56% versus 41%) and survival (19.2 months versus 11.6 months). In addition, toxicities of these regimens were manageable and predictable. In this study, patients received 2 mgr of coumadin to prevent thromboembolic event due to estramustine and only 7 % of the patients had thrombosis. Other grade III \& IV toxicities of the estramustine/docetaxel combination included neutropenia (37% in the 3-week regimen and 0 % in the weekly regimen) nausea/vomiting (2% in the 3-week regimen and 0 % in the weekly regimen), diarrhea (7% in the 3-week regimen and 0 % in the weekly regimen). No febrile neutropenia was observed.

Although these data support a role for chemotherapy combinations, such as estramustine and docetaxel, in the treatment of HRPC, further studies are needed to determine the relative contribution of estramustine to the efficacy of docetaxel/estramustine regimen. In this context, we propose to randomize patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer between docetaxel/estramustine/prednisone and docetaxel/prednisone in a phase II study. The principal endpoint will be the efficacy in term of PSA response. We chose to use the weekly regimen as described by Oudard since the toxicity of this regimen is well described and is easily manageable in our experience.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hormone Resistant Prostate Cancer Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

weekly docetaxel and prednisone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

35mg/m² on day 2 and 9 (21days in a cycle)

estramustine

Intervention Type DRUG

140mg caps x3 bid from day 1to 5 and day 8 to 12 of each cycle

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

2x5 mg a day

B

weekly docetaxel (35mg/m\&) plus prednisone 10mg a day associated with estramustine form day 1to 5 and 8 to 12

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

35mg/m² on day 2 and 9 (21days in a cycle)

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

2x5 mg a day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

docetaxel

35mg/m² on day 2 and 9 (21days in a cycle)

Intervention Type DRUG

estramustine

140mg caps x3 bid from day 1to 5 and day 8 to 12 of each cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

2x5 mg a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Taxotere estramustine phosphate medrol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent prior to beginning protocol specific procedures.
* 18 years
* Histologically/cytologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma.
* Documented metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma
* Patients must have received prior hormonal therapy as defined below:
* Castration by orchiectomy and/or LHRH agonists with or without
* Antiandrogens
* Other hormonal agents (e.g., ketoconazole, ...)
* Testosterone level should be \< 50 ng/dl in all patients (castrated level).
* Respect of antiandrogen withdrawal period
* No prior chemotherapy regimen at the exception of estramustine phosphate.
* documented disease progression defined either (i) by PSA increase and/or (ii) imaging:
* Prior radiation therapy (to less or equal than 25% of the bone marrow only) is allowed. At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since the completion of radiation therapy and the patient must have recovered from side effects.
* Prior surgery is allowed. At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since the completion of surgery.
* Life expectancy \> 3 months.
* ECOG performance status 0-2.
* Normal cardiac function.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior chemotherapy except estramustine phosphate.(2)
* Prior isotope therapy
* Prior radiotherapy to \>25% of bone marrow
* Prior malignancy except the following: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or any other cancer from which the patient has been disease-free for \>5 years.
* Known brain or leptomeningeal involvement.
* Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy \> grade 2
* Other serious illness or medical condition
* Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs.
* Treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy (except LHRH agonists)
* Treatment with systemic corticosteroids used for reasons other than specified by the protocol must be stopped prior to the administration of docetaxel.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Pascal Machiels, MD PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cliniques Universitaires St Luc

Joseph Kerger, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinqiue Universitaire de Mont Godinne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Pierre

Ottignies, Brabant Wallon, Belgium

Site Status

Notre Dame et Reine Fabiola

Charleroi, Hainaut, Belgium

Site Status

RHMS louis caty

Baudour, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinique Saint Luc

Bouge, , Belgium

Site Status

CHR Warquignies

Boussu, , Belgium

Site Status

Az klina

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

Parc Léopold

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Hôpitaux IRIS Sud

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Cliniques Universitaires St luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint Nilolaus

Eupen, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinique St Joseph

Gilly, , Belgium

Site Status

Notre Dame de Grâce

Gosselies, , Belgium

Site Status

CH Jolimont Lobbes

La Louvière, , Belgium

Site Status

St Joseph

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

CHU Ambroise paré

Mons, , Belgium

Site Status

clinique Sainte Elisabeth

Namur, , Belgium

Site Status

Notre Dame

Tournai, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinique Universitaire de Mt Godinne

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

CHR Luxembourg

Luxembourg, , Luxembourg

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Luxembourg

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UCL-ONCO 04-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.