Molecular Stool Testing for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance

NCT ID: NCT02715141

Last Updated: 2022-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

3966 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Since January 2014 the Dutch screening programme for bowel cancer has been implemented. Screening will increase the demand for surveillance. Although patients in whom adenomas have been removed are at increased risk of progressing to cancer, solid evidence on the reduction of death from CRC through the current colonoscopy-based surveillance is lacking. Furthermore, colonoscopy-based surveillance leads to high logistic demands, high individual burden and high costs. Therefore, there is need for new surveillance strategies. Stool-based molecular testing (Cologuard®, consisting of a stool DNA test and an immunochemical assay for human hemoglobin) or Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) may serve as an alternative for colonoscopy surveillance.

The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of an established molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT to colonoscopy for detection of advanced adenomas or CRC (advanced neoplasia) in a surveillance population. These outcomes will be used to model various strategies of stool-based molecular surveillance to inform health policy decisions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND: Since January 2014 the Dutch screening programme for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has been implemented. Screening will increase the demand for surveillance. However, solid evidence on the reduction of death from CRC through the current colonoscopy-based surveillance is lacking. Furthermore, colonoscopy-based surveillance leads to high logistic demands, high patient burden and high costs. Therefore, there is need for new surveillance strategies. Stool-based molecular testing (Cologuard®) or Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) may serve as an alternative for colonoscopy surveillance.

OBJECTIVES:

1. To compare the accuracy of an established molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT to colonoscopy for detection of advanced adenomas or CRC (advanced neoplasia) in a surveillance population.
2. To model various strategies of stool-based molecular surveillance to inform health policy decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational cross-sectional cohort study, individuals aged 50-75 years that are scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy will be invited to participate. They are asked to collect a whole-stool sample prior to the surveillance colonoscopy. The sample will be used to test for the presence of molecular stool markers. The results of the molecular stool test and FIT will be compared to the colonoscopy findings.

EXPECTED RESULTS: Frequent surveillance using stool-based molecular testing is more cost-effective than the current colonoscopy-based surveillance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Collection of stool sample

Collection of stool sample prior to the scheduled surveillance colonoscopy.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects in the age group 50-75 years. The lower age limit is set at 50 years because of the high probability of familiar predisposition when advanced neoplasm is present in a younger age group.26 The upper age limit of 75 years is in correspondence with the recommended stop-age for surveillance according to the current guideline.9
* Subjects with an indication for surveillance colonoscopy according to the previous guideline ('Follow up after polypectomy', 2002; summarized in 2008) or current ('Colonoscopy Surveillance', 2013) guideline. This includes subjects with a history of CRC or polypectomy, as well as subjects under surveillance for familial colorectal carcinoma (FCC).
* Subjects who have sufficient comprehension of the Dutch language.
* Subjects who have given their informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
* Subjects with Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP (AFAP), MUTYH associated polyposis (MAP) and serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS)
* Subjects with a previous colonoscopy \< 6 months (rescopy)
* Subjects with proctocolectomy
* Subjects with life expectancy \< 3 years
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Netherlands Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nethelands Cancer Institute

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carvalho B, de Klaver W, van Wifferen F, van Lanschot MCJ, van Wetering AJP, van der Zander QEW, Lemmens M, Bolijn AS, Tijssen M, Delis-van Diemen P, Buekers N, Daenen K, van der Meer J, van Mulligen PG, Hijmans BS, de Ridder S, Meiqari L, Bierkens M, van der Hulst RWM, Kuyvenhoven JPH, van Berkel AM, Depla ACTM, van Leerdam ME, Jansen JM, Wientjes CA, Straathof JWA, Keulen ETP, Ramsoekh D, Moons LMG, Zacherl M, Masclee AAM, de Wit M, Greuter MJE, van Engeland M, Dekker E, Coupe VMH, Meijer GA. Stool-Based Testing for Post-Polypectomy Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Safely Reduces Colonoscopies: The MOCCAS Study. Gastroenterology. 2025 Jan;168(1):121-135.e16. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.08.022. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39218164 (View on PubMed)

van Lanschot MC, Carvalho B, Coupe VM, van Engeland M, Dekker E, Meijer GA. Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3078-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28173852 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL52708.018.15

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

M15MOC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.