Breath Analysis as an Additional Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Colonoscopies
NCT ID: NCT04357158
Last Updated: 2024-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
750 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-25
2022-07-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
These days, many countries use a non-invasive fecal test for CRC screening which is easy to perform at home, but test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal. Multiple studies have already shown that volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis has a high diagnostic accuracy for CRC and Advanced Adenomas. An additional VOC analysis, for example through breath testing, in patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) may reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies.
The aim of this study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the AeonoseTM to distinguish patients with CRC from healthy controls, and to assess reproducibility of test results.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Using an Electronic Nose Device (AeoNoseTM)
NCT03346005
e-Nose and Colorectal Cancer
NCT03488537
Retroflexion in the Entire Colon for the Detection of Colon-related Diseases
NCT03735953
Molecular Stool Testing for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance
NCT02715141
The Colorectal Breath Analysis (COBRA) Study
NCT03699163
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary objective: To evaluate if the use of an additional breath test (AeonoseTM) for patients with a positive FIT-test can reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies.
Secondary objectives:
1. External validation of results for CRC and (advanced) adenoma detection established in a previous studies (second study not yet published). (15)
2. To evaluate if VOC profiles in breath are similar at two different time points.
3. Acceptance rate of using the AeonoseTM device for VOC analysis in participating patients.
Study population: Patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years old with a positive FIT-test referred for a colonoscopy procedure.
Estimated sample size: 750 participants
Intervention: Participants will be asked to breath through the AeonoseTM for 5 minutes during pre-colonoscopy intake and just prior to the procedure to assess reproducibility (with \>2 weeks in between). There are no risks, nor benefits for the participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients referred for colonoscopy
AeonoseTM
All participants will be asked to breathe into an electronic nose (eNose, the AeonoseTM, The eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) for 5 minutes during the pre-colonoscopy intake and just prior to the procedure to assess reproducibility (with \>2 weeks in between).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AeonoseTM
All participants will be asked to breathe into an electronic nose (eNose, the AeonoseTM, The eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) for 5 minutes during the pre-colonoscopy intake and just prior to the procedure to assess reproducibility (with \>2 weeks in between).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of any type of malignancy, not including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC)
* Current active colitis or history of polyposis syndrome
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter D Siersema, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Riswijk MLM, van Keulen KE, Tan ACITL, Schrauwen RWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Siersema PD; eNose CRC study group. Research Communication: Breath Testing for Colorectal Cancer Detection in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Multicentre Prospective Cross-Sectional Study With External Validation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jul;62(2):208-213. doi: 10.1111/apt.70207. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
van Riswijk MLM, van Tintelen BFM, Lucas RH, van der Palen J, Siersema PD. Overcoming methodological barriers in electronic nose clinical studies, a simulation data-based approach. J Breath Res. 2025 May 9;19(3). doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/add291.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
'2020-6184'
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.