Hybrid-sensor Breath Analysis for Colorectal Cancer Screening

NCT ID: NCT05173077

Last Updated: 2022-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this project is to promote the breath volatile marker concept for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by advancing developing the application of a novel hybrid analyzer for the purpose.

The hybrid analyzer concept is expected to benefit of combining metal-oxide (MOX) and infrared spectrum (IR) sensor acquired data. The current study will be the first globally to address this concept in CRC detection. In addition, traditional methods, in particular, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) will be used to address the biological relevance of the VOCs emission from cancer tissue and will assist in further advances of the hybrid-sensing approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For addressing the aims of the project, four specific research objectives have been set:

1. To identify cancer-related VOCs emitted by the CRC tissue via the comparison of VOCs emitted from cancer tissue with VOCs emitted by non-cancerous tissue (ex vivo surgery material) by GC-MS.
2. To identify the VOCs differentiating human breath from CRC patients and controls (by GC-MS) as well as compare the chemical signature of CRC patients' breath to the chemical signature of cancer tissue.
3. To evaluate the performance of the set of sensors in the hybrid analyzer and the performance of particular sensors for detecting CRC; to develop and validate a mathematical model for CRC detection.
4. To validate the hybrid analyzer in real-life CRC screening settings, i.e. versus the generally accepted CRC screening approach of faecal occult blood detection.
5. To compare faecal microbiome between CRC group and control.

The scientific results to be obtained during the current project are expected to elucidate the origin and metabolism of volatile biomarkers of CRC. This achievement, in turn, will facilitate the implementation of a new screening test based on the newly developed hybrid analyser into medical practice.

Identification of the VOCs patterns by the sensor array for CRC patients when compared to controls. Addressing these objectives will allow an in-depth understanding of the physiological background for exhaled VOCs in CRC patients and facilitate the development of technologies able to identify the disease and its precursors from an exhaled breath sample.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Polyp of Colon

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Colorectal cancer patients

Patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer (adenocarcinoma)

Breath sampling for VOC detection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Breath sampling will be performed by using a hybrid sensor device and or GC-MS analysis (by collecting breath samples in adsorbent tubes). Strict requirements for subjects will be imposed prior to the breath sampling to standardise the breath sampling and to limit the influence of confounding factors.

Blood sample collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification.

Microbiota testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Faecal samples for microbiota testing.

Control group patients without colorectal cancer

Patients without colorectal malignant disease according to data obtained in colonoscopy

Breath sampling for VOC detection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Breath sampling will be performed by using a hybrid sensor device and or GC-MS analysis (by collecting breath samples in adsorbent tubes). Strict requirements for subjects will be imposed prior to the breath sampling to standardise the breath sampling and to limit the influence of confounding factors.

Blood sample collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification.

Microbiota testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Faecal samples for microbiota testing.

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colonoscopy will be used only according to the clinical indications.

Average risk population

Average risk population of both genders aged 40-64 at the time of inclusion lacking alarm symptoms for gastrointestinal cancer

Secondary validation study in general CRC screening settings

Intervention Type OTHER

Altogether at least 1000 individuals relatively healthy 40-64 years old population-based collected individuals will get recruited. Breath samples will be collected by asking the study subjects to breath into hybrid breath analyser.

To exclude significant colorectal lesions, laboratory-based FIT testing will be offered to the population cohort group for faecal occult blood in faeces. Serum and plasma samples will also be obtained to have them available if additional testing will be required. Individuals with a FIT test value over the cut-off value (\>10 microg/g faeces) will be invited to colonoscopy. The data analysis procedures and classification models will be tested in this general population and cross-checked against FIT and colonoscopy results.

Blood sample collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification.

Microbiota testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Faecal samples for microbiota testing.

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colonoscopy will be used only according to the clinical indications.

Colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery

Patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer (adenocarcinoma) planned for surgical management

Identification of specific VOCs in CRC tissue surgery material

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Paired tissue samples will be taken during surgery for CRC. Tissue material from the same patient will be obtained from the cancerous tissue as well as from normal resected material without malignant infiltration. Minimum of 100 mg of each tissue per sample will be obtained. To compare the emission of VOCs in the CRC tissue surgery material to the emissions from normal tissue by GC-MS in a reasonable number of cancer cases.

Blood sample collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification.

Microbiota testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Faecal samples for microbiota testing.

Patients with polyps undergoing polypectomy

Patients with colon polyps that will perform polypectomy

Breath sampling for VOC detection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Breath sampling will be performed by using a hybrid sensor device and or GC-MS analysis (by collecting breath samples in adsorbent tubes). Strict requirements for subjects will be imposed prior to the breath sampling to standardise the breath sampling and to limit the influence of confounding factors.

Blood sample collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification.

Microbiota testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Faecal samples for microbiota testing.

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colonoscopy will be used only according to the clinical indications.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Identification of specific VOCs in CRC tissue surgery material

Paired tissue samples will be taken during surgery for CRC. Tissue material from the same patient will be obtained from the cancerous tissue as well as from normal resected material without malignant infiltration. Minimum of 100 mg of each tissue per sample will be obtained. To compare the emission of VOCs in the CRC tissue surgery material to the emissions from normal tissue by GC-MS in a reasonable number of cancer cases.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Secondary validation study in general CRC screening settings

Altogether at least 1000 individuals relatively healthy 40-64 years old population-based collected individuals will get recruited. Breath samples will be collected by asking the study subjects to breath into hybrid breath analyser.

To exclude significant colorectal lesions, laboratory-based FIT testing will be offered to the population cohort group for faecal occult blood in faeces. Serum and plasma samples will also be obtained to have them available if additional testing will be required. Individuals with a FIT test value over the cut-off value (\>10 microg/g faeces) will be invited to colonoscopy. The data analysis procedures and classification models will be tested in this general population and cross-checked against FIT and colonoscopy results.

Intervention Type OTHER

Breath sampling for VOC detection

Breath sampling will be performed by using a hybrid sensor device and or GC-MS analysis (by collecting breath samples in adsorbent tubes). Strict requirements for subjects will be imposed prior to the breath sampling to standardise the breath sampling and to limit the influence of confounding factors.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blood sample collection

Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification.

Intervention Type OTHER

Microbiota testing

Faecal samples for microbiota testing.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy will be used only according to the clinical indications.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult individuals (\>18 years of age)
* Having signed the consent form
* Willingness to collaborate
* Able to provide a breath sample

* For the cancer group: colorectal adenocarcinoma has to be documented histologically (histological diagnosis following gastric surgery is also accepted) or patients being confirmed adenocarcinoma during the course of the study.
* For the non-cancer group: control group - any patient who have medical indications for a colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient has not signed the consent form
* Patients who have had a complete bowel cleansing
* Other active malignancies
* Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy is currently underway
* Acute conditions (emergency surgery for the patient)
* Small bowel resection in the past
* Terminal renal failure (Chronic renal failure stage 4)
* Type I diabetes
* Bronchial asthma (active)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaet Innsbruck

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Ulm

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Latvia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marcis Leja

Director, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Latvia

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Latvia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marcis Leja, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+37129497500

Linda Mezmale, MD

Role: CONTACT

+37129918302

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marcis Leja, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+37129497500

Linda Mezmale, MD

Role: backup

+37129918302

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):683-691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26818619 (View on PubMed)

Jurs PC, Bakken GA, McClelland HE. Computational methods for the analysis of chemical sensor array data from volatile analytes. Chem Rev. 2000 Jul 12;100(7):2649-78. doi: 10.1021/cr9800964. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11749299 (View on PubMed)

van Keulen KE, Jansen ME, Schrauwen RWM, Kolkman JJ, Siersema PD. Volatile organic compounds in breath can serve as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for the detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;51(3):334-346. doi: 10.1111/apt.15622. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31858615 (View on PubMed)

Zhou W, Tao J, Li J, Tao S. Volatile organic compounds analysis as a potential novel screening tool for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20937. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020937.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32629696 (View on PubMed)

Sonoda H, Kohnoe S, Yamazato T, Satoh Y, Morizono G, Shikata K, Morita M, Watanabe A, Morita M, Kakeji Y, Inoue F, Maehara Y. Colorectal cancer screening with odour material by canine scent detection. Gut. 2011 Jun;60(6):814-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.218305. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21282130 (View on PubMed)

Konvalina G, Haick H. Effect of humidity on nanoparticle-based chemiresistors: a comparison between synthetic and real-world samples. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012 Jan;4(1):317-25. doi: 10.1021/am2013695. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22121824 (View on PubMed)

Hagemann LT, Ehrle S, Mizaikoff B. Optimizing the Analytical Performance of Substrate-Integrated Hollow Waveguides: Experiment and Simulation. Appl Spectrosc. 2019 Dec;73(12):1451-1460. doi: 10.1177/0003702819867342. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31397586 (View on PubMed)

Hagemann LT , McCartney MM , Fung AG , Peirano DJ , Davis CE , Mizaikoff B . Portable combination of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential mobility spectrometry for advanced vapor phase analysis. Analyst. 2018 Nov 19;143(23):5683-5691. doi: 10.1039/c8an01192c.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30232480 (View on PubMed)

Tutuncu E, Nagele M, Becker S, Fischer M, Koeth J, Wolf C, Kostler S, Ribitsch V, Teuber A, Groger M, Kress S, Wepler M, Wachter U, Vogt J, Radermacher P, Mizaikoff B. Advanced Photonic Sensors Based on Interband Cascade Lasers for Real-Time Mouse Breath Analysis. ACS Sens. 2018 Sep 28;3(9):1743-1749. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.8b00477. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30074387 (View on PubMed)

Glockler J, Jaeschke C, Kocaoz Y, Kokoric V, Tutuncu E, Mitrovics J, Mizaikoff B. iHWG-MOX: A Hybrid Breath Analysis System via the Combination of Substrate-Integrated Hollow Waveguide Infrared Spectroscopy with Metal Oxide Gas Sensors. ACS Sens. 2020 Apr 24;5(4):1033-1039. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b02554. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32189494 (View on PubMed)

Chandrapalan S, Arasaradnam RP. Urine as a biological modality for colorectal cancer detection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 May;20(5):489-496. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1738928. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32130868 (View on PubMed)

Gasenko E, Leja M, Polaka I, Hegmane A, Murillo R, Bordin D, Link A, Kulju M, Mochalski P, Shani G, Malfertheiner P, Herrero R, Haick H. How do international gastric cancer prevention guidelines influence clinical practice globally? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Sep;29(5):400-407. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000580.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32740165 (View on PubMed)

Lawler M, Alsina D, Adams RA, Anderson AS, Brown G, Fearnhead NS, Fenwick SW, Halloran SP, Hochhauser D, Hull MA, Koelzer VH, McNair AGK, Monahan KJ, Nathke I, Norton C, Novelli MR, Steele RJC, Thomas AL, Wilde LM, Wilson RH, Tomlinson I; Bowel Cancer UK Critical Research Gaps in Colorectal Cancer Initiative. Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer. Gut. 2018 Jan;67(1):179-193. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315333.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29233930 (View on PubMed)

Broza YY, Mochalski P, Ruzsanyi V, Amann A, Haick H. Hybrid volatolomics and disease detection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015 Sep 14;54(38):11036-48. doi: 10.1002/anie.201500153. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26235374 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1.1.1.1/20/A/035

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.