Corticosteroid and Lidocain Injections for Tennis Elbow
NCT ID: NCT02700906
Last Updated: 2016-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Corticosteroid Injection Verses High Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT02613455
Corticosteroid(CS) + Lido or Corticosteroid(CS) Alone
NCT03704584
Mesotherapy In Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT04201249
Intra-Articular 0.5 % Lidocaine Injection for Osteoarthritis
NCT02632565
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Chronic Epicondylitis
NCT01945528
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment of tennis elbow includes relative rest, physical therapy (therapeutic exercise, massage, therapeutic ultrasound, lower power laser, etc.), analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glyceryl trinitrate patches, injection therapy (corticosteroid, hyaluronan gel, botulinum toxin, and autologous platelet-rich plasma), shock wave therapy, and even surgery. Previous studies showed corticosteroid injection is effective in the short term, but is harmful in the long-term, and is more likely to have a recurrence. In consideration of a degenerative lesion in tennis elbow, corticosteroid injection may be not an ideal agent. Although plate-rich plasma injection showed promising results, the high cost limited its widespread clinical use. Since local lidocain injection is commonly used in the management of myofascial pain syndrome, it might be effective in the treatment of tendinopathy like tennis elbow. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of corticosteroid injection and lidocain injection in the treatment of tennis elbow. The investigators hypothesized that lidocain injection is as effective as corticosteroid injection in management of tennis elbow, and if so, it may replace corticosteroid injection in the management of tennis elbow.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Corticosteroid injection
For corticosteroid injection, triamcinolone (10mg/ml) 1 ml will be injected to the lateral epicondyle of the affected elbow.
Corticosteroid
triamcinolone (10mg/ml) 1 ml will be injected to the lateral epicondyle of the affected elbow.
Lidocaine injection
For lidocain injection, 1ml 1% lidocain will also be peppered on the same area.
Lidocaine
For lidocain injection, 1ml 1% lidocain will also be peppered on the same area.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Corticosteroid
triamcinolone (10mg/ml) 1 ml will be injected to the lateral epicondyle of the affected elbow.
Lidocaine
For lidocain injection, 1ml 1% lidocain will also be peppered on the same area.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Reproducibility of pain by 2 or more of the following tests: palpation of the lateral epicondyle and/or the common extensor origin of the elbow; resisted wrist extension (dorsiflexion) and pronation with the elbow in extension
* Pain reproduced by static stretching of the pronated wrist in palmar flexion with the elbow in extension.
20 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lin-Fen Hsieh
Chief
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lin-Fen Lin-Fen, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20130713R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.