Unloading Induced Effects on Local Glucose Uptake Into m. Soleus
NCT ID: NCT02698878
Last Updated: 2016-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation: A Novel Treatment for Improving Metabolism
NCT06722391
Effectiveness of NMES Associated to Vascular Occlusion in Functional Performance and Muscle Hypertrophy in Athlete's
NCT02406339
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Via the Peroneal Nerve Reduces Muscle Soreness Following Intermittent Exercise
NCT02018211
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT04314960
NMES With PNF for Ankle Sprain Rehabilitation
NCT07190599
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
primary hypothesis:
* Assesment and evaluation of insulin sensitivity and local glucose uptake in the unloaded m. soleus and whether it can be improved by dietary supplementation of lupin seeds and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
secondary hypotheses:
* Assesment and evaluation of unloading-induced reductions in muscle mass and whether they can be mitigated by dietary supplementation of lupin seed and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
* Assesment and evaluation of whole-body glycemic effects of the interventions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Control Group consisting of six healthy male subjects wearing only the HEPHAISTOS ORTHOSIS for lower leg unloading (60 days).
HEPHAISTOS unloading orthotic device
Orthotic device which unloads the muscles of the lower leg. Subjects had to wear the device for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days).
Intervention Group
Intervention group consisting of seven healthy mal subjects, wearing the HEPHAISTOS orthosis for lower leg unloading (60 days), plus receiving lupin protein every day and performing a neuromuscular electrical stimulation training twice a day.
lupin protein
19g of lupin crunchy every day for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Individual neuromuscular electrical stimulation training had to be performed twice a day (morning and evening) over the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days). Subjects were asked to continuously increase the intensity until a maximum intensity of 100mA per training.
HEPHAISTOS unloading orthotic device
Orthotic device which unloads the muscles of the lower leg. Subjects had to wear the device for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lupin protein
19g of lupin crunchy every day for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Individual neuromuscular electrical stimulation training had to be performed twice a day (morning and evening) over the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days). Subjects were asked to continuously increase the intensity until a maximum intensity of 100mA per training.
HEPHAISTOS unloading orthotic device
Orthotic device which unloads the muscles of the lower leg. Subjects had to wear the device for the whole duration of the intervention phase (60 days).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: between 20 and 45 years
* Body mass index (BMI): 20 -26 kg/m2
* Agreement and signed consent before the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Competitive Athletes
* Diabetes mellitus
* Rheumatic disease
* Muscle or joint disease
* Bone fractures in the period up to one year before study start
* Herniated disc
* Flatfeet (pes planus)
* Allergy to nuts or legume
* Vascular diseases
* Epilepsy
* Severe hyperlipidemia
* Anemia (\< Hb standard values; standard values healthy men: 13.5 -17.5 g/dl) \*
* Increased thrombosis risk \*
* Kidney disorder: deviations from normal values for creatinine in plasma. (Normal value: Creatinine \< 1.20 mg/dl)\*
* Lesions of the cruciate ligaments, or orthopedic surgery in the past 10 years on the side of the Hephaistos orthosis
* Achilles tendon injury, or rupture in the past 10 years on the side of the orthosis
* hyper-/hypocalcaemia (abnormal levels of calcium in the blood, normal level: 2.15 - 2.64 mmol/l)
* Intake of anti-inflammatory drugs during the study
* Abuse of drugs or alcohol (\> than 20-30g alcohol/day)
* Participation in another clinical study within the last 2 months before the start of this study
* Increased bleeding tendency (hemophilia, regular use of anticoagulants)
* History of intolerance to local anesthetics
* Imprisoned during study
* Any other condition classed as unsuitable for study participation by the medical executive director
* prior convictions (objectionable criminal record)
* Metal implants or other osteosynthesis material
* Pacemaker
* Claustrophobia
20 Years
45 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DLR German Aerospace Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jörn Rittweger, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
DLR German Aerospace Center
Kathrin Schopen, M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
DLR German Aerospace Center
Petra Frings-Meuthen, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
DLR German Aerospace Center
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zange J, Schopen K, Albracht K, Gerlach DA, Frings-Meuthen P, Maffiuletti NA, Bloch W, Rittweger J. Using the Hephaistos orthotic device to study countermeasure effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and dietary lupin protein supplementation, a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171562. eCollection 2017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NHP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.