Comparing Rate Response With CLS Versus Accelerometer ICD Settings in Heart Failure Patients With BIOTRONIK CRT-Ds
NCT ID: NCT02693262
Last Updated: 2021-08-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2020-07-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
International Study to Determine if AdreView Heart Function Scan Can be Used to Identify Patients With Mild or Moderate Heart Failure (HF) That Benefit From Implanted Medical Device
NCT02656329
A PRospective, rAndomizEd Comparison of subcuTaneOous and tRansvenous ImplANtable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy
NCT01296022
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Study for the Approval of Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) and Cardiac Resyncronization Pacing Therapies (CRT) for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) With Ablate and Pace
NCT00356057
Clinical Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Using the Ovatio CRT Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) System
NCT00528320
Sensing Atrial High Rate Episodes With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Trial (The SENSE Trial)
NCT02186704
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether changes to an implanted ICD can improve the functional status of patients with suspected chronotropic incompetence (CI). CI is a condition in which the heart rate is unable to adequately respond to meet the patient's physical demands, such as walking, climbing stairs, or doing household chores. CI is common in patients with cardiovascular disease, particularly in patients with heart failure. Common clinical management of patients with suspected CI is to activate an accelerometer setting in the cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) device. An accelerometer will adjust the heart rate to fit the physiological circumstances and needs of the patient based on patient movement only. BIOTRONIK is a company that has developed a novel technology included in the settings for CRT-D devices that offers CLS as an alternative to a standard accelerometer. CLS utilizes sensed electrical properties of the heart in order to assess what may be the best heart rate for both physical and mental demands. This study is designed to compare whether patients will benefit from CLS when compared with standard accelerometer technology.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CLS Mode on Biotronik CRT-D
All 15 patients will be randomized to this group. Their device will be set in the CLS mode for 1 week.
CLS Mode on Biotronik CRT-D
Setting changed and monitored. Quality of life evaluated through CPET, 6 Minute Walk Test, and Rand 36 Questionnaire.
Accelerometer Mode on Biotronik CRT-D
All 15 patients will be randomized to this group. Their device will be set in the accelerometer rate responsive mode for 1 week.
Accelerometer Mode on Biotronik CRT-D
Setting changed and monitored. Quality of life evaluated through CPET, 6 Minute Walk Test, and Rand 36 Questionnaire.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CLS Mode on Biotronik CRT-D
Setting changed and monitored. Quality of life evaluated through CPET, 6 Minute Walk Test, and Rand 36 Questionnaire.
Accelerometer Mode on Biotronik CRT-D
Setting changed and monitored. Quality of life evaluated through CPET, 6 Minute Walk Test, and Rand 36 Questionnaire.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients at least 18 years old
* Patients who have plausible symptoms of CI based on previous monitoring and clinical symptoms
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unwilling/unable to provide informed consent
* Patients who are unable to complete study related procedures
* Current persistent atrial fibrillation
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biotronik, Inc.
INDUSTRY
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jonathan Hsu
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan Hsu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alt E. What is the ideal rate-adaptive sensor for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: lessons from cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 11;83(5B):17D-23D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01038-8.
Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices); American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(21):e350-408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742. Epub 2008 May 15. No abstract available.
Freedman RA, Hopper DL, Mah J, Hummel J, Wilkoff BL. Assessment of pacemaker chronotropic response: implementation of the Wilkoff mathematical model. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Dec;24(12):1748-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01748.x.
Maass AH, Buck S, Nieuwland W, Brugemann J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC. Importance of heart rate during exercise for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jul;20(7):773-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01422.x. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
Coenen M, Malinowski K, Spitzer W, Schuchert A, Schmitz D, Anelli-Monti M, Maier SK, Estlinbaum W, Bauer A, Muehling H, Kalscheur F, Puerner K, Boergel J, Osswald S. Closed loop stimulation and accelerometer-based rate adaptation: results of the PROVIDE study. Europace. 2008 Mar;10(3):327-33. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun024. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
Tse HF, Siu CW, Lee KL, Fan K, Chan HW, Tang MO, Tsang V, Lee SW, Lau CP. The incremental benefit of rate-adaptive pacing on exercise performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.097.
Keteyian SJ, Isaac D, Thadani U, Roy BA, Bensimhon DR, McKelvie R, Russell SD, Hellkamp AS, Kraus WE; HF-ACTION Investigators. Safety of symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure due to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4 Suppl):S72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.014.
Hsu JC, Darden D, Alegre M, Birgersdotter-Green U, Feld GK, Hoffmayer KS, Han F, Krummen D, Raissi F, Ho G, Taub PR, Urey MA, Adler E. Effect of closed loop stimulation versus accelerometer on outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy: the CLASS trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;61(3):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00829-4. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
151774
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.