Evaluation of the BIOTRONIK AutoAdapt Algorithm for Continuous Automatic Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization

NCT ID: NCT04774523

Last Updated: 2025-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-31

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BIO\|Adapt study is designed to provide evidence for the clinical benefit of the CRT AutoAdapt feature. This feature provides continuous adaptation of AV delay and biventricular pacing modality. However, additional clinical data on the short and mid-term improvement of CRT-D patients by the CRT AutoAdapt feature are needed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The magnitude of clinical and hemodynamic benefit of CRT varies significantly among its recipients. Many studies report that approximately one-third of the implanted population show no clinical improvement at follow-ups. There are many clinical factors that are associated with the CRT response and the grade of benefit, such as type of cardiomyopathy, severity of electrical conduction abnormalities, dyssynchrony, and scar burden. In addition, there are device-related factors such as lead location, insufficient ventricular pacing percentage (%V), and suboptimal atrial-ventricular (AV) and ventricle- ventricle (VV) timing.

The main finding in such CRT non-responders is a suboptimal AV-timing (47%). The optimization of AV and VV intervals during biventricular (BiV) pacing is an option to maximize the positive effects of CRT, by taking advantage of the full atrial contraction for optimal filling of the ventricles. Optimization is usually accomplished by using echocardiography or other methods. However, such methods are time consuming for the hospitals and may not provide a benefit for every patient.

The most common pacing mode for CRT therapy is BiV pacing, but many acute and chronic randomized clinical studies have demonstrated that left-ventricular (LV) pacing can be at least as effective as BiV pacing. In patients with sinus rhythm and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction, pacing the left ventricle only with an appropriate AV interval can result in an even superior LV and right ventricular (RV) function compared with standard BiV pacing. LV pacing has been proposed as an alternative approach to apply cardiac resynchronization as it has been shown that LV pacing induces short-term hemodynamic benefits compared to BiV pacing.

Different algorithms have been developed by different manufactures to provide continuous automatic CRT optimization, allowing a more physiologic ventricular activation and greater device longevity in patients with normal AV conduction due to the reduction of unnecessary RV pacing. Studies with the Medtronic Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm, that provides automatic ambulatory selection between synchronized LV or BiV pacing with dynamic optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delays, have shown that the algorithm is safe and as effective as BiV pacing with comprehensive echocardiographic optimization.

The CRT AutoAdapt feature by BIOTRONIK optimizes the CRT therapy settings of the device automatically and continuously. This algorithm adjusts the AV delay and sets the ventricular pacing configuration to BiV or LV. The settings are based on intracardiac conduction times, which are measured every 60 seconds to select the optimal configuration.

The objective of this study is to show non-inferiority of this feature compared to standard echo-based optimization with regard to clinical benefit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure Cardiac Arrhythmia Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

There will be two arms with the same study flow chart along the study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

This group will be made up of patients implanted with CRT-D devices without the CRT AutoAdapt feature, or with the CRT AutoAdapt feature deactivated.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Echocardiography AV optimization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient in the control group undergo the routine echo-based AV-optimization that is usually performed at the investigational site (Ritter method or iterative method). Performance of an additional VV-delay optimization is left to the investigator discretion

Echocardiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)

Self Assessment Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score

AutoAdapt group

This group will be made up of patients implanted with CRT-D devices that have the CRT AutoAdapt feature available. It is mandatory that all patients within this group have the feature activated, independently of other characteristics.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in the AutoAdapt group undergo the echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.

Three steps must be followed:

1. Standard AV programming: perform echo for AoVTI assessment.
2. Echo-optimized AV programming: perform standard echo-based AV-optimization (Ritter method or iterative method, according to routine at investigational site); measure AoVTI at optimized setting.
3. AutoAdapt optimized programming: The system allows different programming options for the parameter 'Adaptive AV reduction'. The nominal value is 0.7, but it can be modified to different values ranging from 0.5 to 0.9. The AoVTI shall be measured at standard setting of the "Adaptive Av reduction" parameter, 0.7.

Echocardiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)

Self Assessment Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.

Patients in the AutoAdapt group undergo the echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.

Three steps must be followed:

1. Standard AV programming: perform echo for AoVTI assessment.
2. Echo-optimized AV programming: perform standard echo-based AV-optimization (Ritter method or iterative method, according to routine at investigational site); measure AoVTI at optimized setting.
3. AutoAdapt optimized programming: The system allows different programming options for the parameter 'Adaptive AV reduction'. The nominal value is 0.7, but it can be modified to different values ranging from 0.5 to 0.9. The AoVTI shall be measured at standard setting of the "Adaptive Av reduction" parameter, 0.7.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Echocardiography AV optimization

Patient in the control group undergo the routine echo-based AV-optimization that is usually performed at the investigational site (Ritter method or iterative method). Performance of an additional VV-delay optimization is left to the investigator discretion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Echocardiography

Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Self Assessment Score

Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Indication for de novo implantation or upgrade to a CRT-D device
* Enrolled in BIO\|STREAM.HF but not yet implanted with or upgraded to CRT-D
* LVEF \< 35%
* QRS \> 120 ms
* NYHA II-IV
* Atrial heart rate during sinus rhythm at rest below 100 bpm
* Patient is able to understand the nature of the study and willing to provide written informed consent to this submodule

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned implantation or previous implantation with a BIOTRONIK DX ICD lead
* History of persistent/permanent AF
* History of complete AV-block
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biotronik SE & Co. KG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francisco Javier García Fernandez, Physician

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Spain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr Francisco Javier Garcia

Burgos, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CR028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.