Evaluation of the BIOTRONIK AutoAdapt Algorithm for Continuous Automatic Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization
NCT ID: NCT04774523
Last Updated: 2025-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
198 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-31
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk After CRT-D Replacement for Patients With Primary Prevention Indication
NCT02323503
Management and Detection of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Patients Implanted With BIOTRONIK DX Systems
NCT01774357
A Prospective Pilot Study (BIO|SELECT Pilot)
NCT03337763
Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study
NCT00980057
AdaptResponse Clinical Trial
NCT02205359
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main finding in such CRT non-responders is a suboptimal AV-timing (47%). The optimization of AV and VV intervals during biventricular (BiV) pacing is an option to maximize the positive effects of CRT, by taking advantage of the full atrial contraction for optimal filling of the ventricles. Optimization is usually accomplished by using echocardiography or other methods. However, such methods are time consuming for the hospitals and may not provide a benefit for every patient.
The most common pacing mode for CRT therapy is BiV pacing, but many acute and chronic randomized clinical studies have demonstrated that left-ventricular (LV) pacing can be at least as effective as BiV pacing. In patients with sinus rhythm and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction, pacing the left ventricle only with an appropriate AV interval can result in an even superior LV and right ventricular (RV) function compared with standard BiV pacing. LV pacing has been proposed as an alternative approach to apply cardiac resynchronization as it has been shown that LV pacing induces short-term hemodynamic benefits compared to BiV pacing.
Different algorithms have been developed by different manufactures to provide continuous automatic CRT optimization, allowing a more physiologic ventricular activation and greater device longevity in patients with normal AV conduction due to the reduction of unnecessary RV pacing. Studies with the Medtronic Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm, that provides automatic ambulatory selection between synchronized LV or BiV pacing with dynamic optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delays, have shown that the algorithm is safe and as effective as BiV pacing with comprehensive echocardiographic optimization.
The CRT AutoAdapt feature by BIOTRONIK optimizes the CRT therapy settings of the device automatically and continuously. This algorithm adjusts the AV delay and sets the ventricular pacing configuration to BiV or LV. The settings are based on intracardiac conduction times, which are measured every 60 seconds to select the optimal configuration.
The objective of this study is to show non-inferiority of this feature compared to standard echo-based optimization with regard to clinical benefit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
This group will be made up of patients implanted with CRT-D devices without the CRT AutoAdapt feature, or with the CRT AutoAdapt feature deactivated.
Echocardiography AV optimization
Patient in the control group undergo the routine echo-based AV-optimization that is usually performed at the investigational site (Ritter method or iterative method). Performance of an additional VV-delay optimization is left to the investigator discretion
Echocardiography
Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)
Self Assessment Score
Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score
AutoAdapt group
This group will be made up of patients implanted with CRT-D devices that have the CRT AutoAdapt feature available. It is mandatory that all patients within this group have the feature activated, independently of other characteristics.
Echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.
Patients in the AutoAdapt group undergo the echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.
Three steps must be followed:
1. Standard AV programming: perform echo for AoVTI assessment.
2. Echo-optimized AV programming: perform standard echo-based AV-optimization (Ritter method or iterative method, according to routine at investigational site); measure AoVTI at optimized setting.
3. AutoAdapt optimized programming: The system allows different programming options for the parameter 'Adaptive AV reduction'. The nominal value is 0.7, but it can be modified to different values ranging from 0.5 to 0.9. The AoVTI shall be measured at standard setting of the "Adaptive Av reduction" parameter, 0.7.
Echocardiography
Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)
Self Assessment Score
Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.
Patients in the AutoAdapt group undergo the echo-based assessment of the acute hemodynamic effect of the CRT AutoAdapt feature.
Three steps must be followed:
1. Standard AV programming: perform echo for AoVTI assessment.
2. Echo-optimized AV programming: perform standard echo-based AV-optimization (Ritter method or iterative method, according to routine at investigational site); measure AoVTI at optimized setting.
3. AutoAdapt optimized programming: The system allows different programming options for the parameter 'Adaptive AV reduction'. The nominal value is 0.7, but it can be modified to different values ranging from 0.5 to 0.9. The AoVTI shall be measured at standard setting of the "Adaptive Av reduction" parameter, 0.7.
Echocardiography AV optimization
Patient in the control group undergo the routine echo-based AV-optimization that is usually performed at the investigational site (Ritter method or iterative method). Performance of an additional VV-delay optimization is left to the investigator discretion
Echocardiography
Echocardiography must be performed at baseline and 12 month Follow Up to collect the LVEF/LVESD(V)/LVEDD(V)
Self Assessment Score
Patient must complete the self assessment score at 6 and 12 month Follow Up, that will be use for the Packer Clinical Composite Score
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Enrolled in BIO\|STREAM.HF but not yet implanted with or upgraded to CRT-D
* LVEF \< 35%
* QRS \> 120 ms
* NYHA II-IV
* Atrial heart rate during sinus rhythm at rest below 100 bpm
* Patient is able to understand the nature of the study and willing to provide written informed consent to this submodule
Exclusion Criteria
* History of persistent/permanent AF
* History of complete AV-block
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francisco Javier García Fernandez, Physician
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Spain
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr Francisco Javier Garcia
Burgos, Castille and León, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CR028
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.