A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saxagliptin Co-administered With Dapagliflozin Compared to Saxagliptin or Dapagliflozin All Given as add-on Therapy to Metformin in Subject With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT02681094

Last Updated: 2018-10-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

905 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-26

Study Completion Date

2017-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of therapy with saxagliptin 5mg co-administered with dapagliflozin 5mg, compared to therapy with saxagliptin 5mg or dapagliflozin 5mg in patients who are inadequately controlled on ≥1500mg/day of metformin monotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequate Glycaemic Control

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin+Metformin

5 mg Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 24 weeks for Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

5mg, orally, Green, plain, diamond-shaped, film-coated tablet

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

5mg, orally, Plain, yellow, biconvex, round, film-coated tablet

Dapagliflozin+Saxagliptin placebo+Metformin

5 mg Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 24 weeks for Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin Placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

5mg, orally, Green, plain, diamond-shaped, film-coated tablet

Placebo for Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Does not contain active ingredient, orally, Plain, yellow, biconvex, round, film-coated tablet

Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin placebo+metformin

5 mg Tablets, Oral, Once daily, 24 weeks for Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo for Dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

Does not contain active ingredient, orally, Green, plain, diamond-shaped, film-coated tablet

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

5mg, orally, Plain, yellow, biconvex, round, film-coated tablet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dapagliflozin

5mg, orally, Green, plain, diamond-shaped, film-coated tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for Dapagliflozin

Does not contain active ingredient, orally, Green, plain, diamond-shaped, film-coated tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Saxagliptin

5mg, orally, Plain, yellow, biconvex, round, film-coated tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for Saxagliptin

Does not contain active ingredient, orally, Plain, yellow, biconvex, round, film-coated tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Forxiga Onglyza™

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged ≥18 years old at time of informed consent;
2. Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) defined as HbA1C≥7.5% to ≤10.0% at screening visit;
3. Stable metformin therapy for at least 8 weeks prior to enrolment at a dose of ≥1500mg per day;
4. BMI ≤45.0kg/m2 at Enrolment visit;
5. Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) ≤ 270mg/dl(15.0mmol/L) at the enrolment visit;
6. For Females Only: Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an acceptable method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study medication in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of diabetes insipidus, Type 1 diabetes or Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adults, diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar nonketotic coma and Symptoms of poorly controlled diabetes that would preclude participation in this trial including but not limited to marked polyuria and polydipsia with greater than 10% weight loss during the 3 months prior to Enrolment (Visit 1), or other signs and symptoms.
2. History of pancreatitis.
3. Administration of any antihyperglycaemic therapy, other than metformin, for more than 14 days (consecutive or not) during the 8 weeks prior to enrolment
4. Any use of DPP-4 inhibitor or SGLT-2 inhibitor within 8 weeks prior to enrolment.
5. Significant hepatic disease, including, but not limited to, chronic active hepatitis and/or severe hepatic insufficiency and/or significant abnormal liver function, including patients with Alanine transaminase (ALT) and/or Aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥3x ULN (Upper Limit of Normal)and/or Total Bilirubin ≥2.0x ULN. History of severe hepatobiliary disease or hepatotoxicity with any medication. Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease, including patients who are known to be positive for Hepatitis viral antibody ImmunoglobulinM (IgM), Hepatitis B surface antigen, and Hepatitis C virus antibody.
6. Moderate or severe impairment of renal function \[defined as Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) \<60milliLitre/min/1.73 m2 (estimated by Modification in Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD)) or serum creatinine ≥1.5mg/dL in males or ≥1.4mg/dL in females\]. Conditions of congenital renal glucosuria, history of unstable or rapidly progressing renal disease.
7. History of any clinically significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, may influence the results, or may limit the patient's ability to participate in or complete the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

130 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Saraland, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Harbor City, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hawaiian Gardens, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Montclair, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Vallejo, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Northglenn, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cooper City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Doral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Buford, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hazel Crest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Zachary, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Biloxi, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Maumee, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

East Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Scarborough Village, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Mirabel, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Marc-des-Carrieres, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Chrudim III, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Jílové u Prahy, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Praha Klanovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bünde, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Giengen an der Brenz, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Großheirath, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hof, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hohenmölsen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Lichtenfels, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Meine, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Rehburg-Loccum, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Stolberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

México, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Zapopan, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Tver', , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Vladikavkaz, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Czechia Germany Mexico Russia

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D1683C00005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Saxagliptin Triple Oral Therapy
NCT01128153 COMPLETED PHASE3