Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin Co-administered With Dapagliflozin in Combination With Metformin Compared to Sitagliptin in Combination With Metformin in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Therapy Alone

NCT ID: NCT02284893

Last Updated: 2018-06-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

461 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-09

Study Completion Date

2016-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study will evaluate if a combination of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin added concurrently to metformin in combination with diet and exercise is superior to sitagliptin added to metformin in combination with diet and exercise in reducing mean HbA1c over a treatment period of 26 weeks.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A1:Saxagliptin / Placebo + Dapagliflozin / Placebo

Saxagliptin 5 mg and matching placebo 0 mg (once daily) plus Dapagliflozin 10 mg and matching placebo 0 mg (once daily)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

administered orally once daily

Dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

administered orally once daily

Placebo matching with Saxagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

administered orally once daily

Placebo matching with Dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

administered orally once daily

A2: Sitagliptin / placebo

Sitagliptin 100 mg and matching placebo 0 mg (once daily)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

administered orally once daily

Placebo matching with Sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

administered orally once daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Saxagliptin

administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Dapagliflozin

administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Sitagliptin

administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching with Saxagliptin

administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching with Dapagliflozin

administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching with Sitagliptin

administered orally once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate glycemic control, defined as a central laboratory glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥8.0% and ≤ 10.5 % obtained at the screening visit
* Subjects should have been taking the same daily dose of metformin ≥ 1500 mg for at least 8 weeks prior to the enrollment visit and with no intake of other antihyperglycemic therapy for more than 14 days (consecutive or not) during 12 weeks prior to screening
* BMI \> 20.0 kg/m2 at the enrollment visit
* Males and Females, age ≥18 years old at time of screening visit
* Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of study drug
* Women must not be breastfeeding

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically diagnosed with Type I diabetes, known diagnosis of Maturity Onset Diabetes of Young (MODY), secondary diabetes mellitus or diabetes insipidus
* History of diabetic ketoacidosis
* Any of the following cardiovascular (CV)/Vascular Diseases within 3 months of the enrollment visit

* Myocardial infarction
* Cardiac surgery or revascularization (coronary artery bypass surgery Coronary Artery Bypass Graft \[(CABG)\]/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[(PTCA)\])
* Unstable angina
* Unstable congestive heart failure (CHF)
* Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or significant cerebrovascular disease
* Unstable or previously undiagnosed arrhythmia
* Congestive heart failure, defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III and IV, unstable or acute congestive heart failure and/or known left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 40%
* Renal Disease
* Hepatic Diseases
* Hematological and Oncological Disease/Conditions
* Hemoglobin ≤ 11.0 g/dL (110 g/L) for men; hemoglobin ≤ 10.0 g/dL (100 g/L) for women
* Abnormal Free T4
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Astra Zeneca

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Huntington Park, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lomita, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norwalk, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Golden, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Richland Hills, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pasadena, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Suffolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baja, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Cuautla, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Buzău, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Galati, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Satu Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Boksburg North, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Lenasia, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Moloto South, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Soweto, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Hungary Mexico Poland Romania South Africa

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-001102-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CV181-363

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Saxagliptin Triple Oral Therapy
NCT01128153 COMPLETED PHASE3