Functional Outcome and Analgesia in TKA: Radiofrequency vs Continuous Adductor Canal Block

NCT ID: NCT02680392

Last Updated: 2021-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-14

Study Completion Date

2017-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double blind controlled trial is designed to investigate the potential benefits of radiofrequency in terms of analgesia and functional outcome, compared to the conventional continuous adductor canal block, for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two analgesia techniques in patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) on the functional recovery and pain control: Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency (PRF and TRF) applied respectively to the saphenous nerve and to the genicular nerves of the knee (femoral and sciatic branches) compared with Continuous adductor canal block with local anesthetics (CACB).

The Null Hypothesis is that no difference exists in the functional recovery, in pain medication consumption and in postoperative exercise and physical performance between two groups of patients submitted to TKA with the two different modalities of analgesia.

To test the null hypothesis we hypothesize as clinically relevant:

* a reduction of 30% in the time needed to perform the Timed Up and Go test at 2 days after surgery
* a reduction of 30% in pain medication consumption in the first 24 ore after surgery.

To test the null Hypothesis, 40 patients are needed (20 for each group).

The primary outcome measures will be:

* the time required in the two groups (CACB-group and RF-group) to perform the Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test on the second postoperative day (POD2). TUG measures the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. During the test, the person is expected to use any mobility aids that they would normally require.
* the total morphine consumption by means of the patient-controlled analgesia pump over the first 24-h after surgery, which can be measured precisely through the record of the dose delivered by the PCA pump. With an alpha error of 0.05, a power of 80% and a standard deviation of 7 mg of morphine consumption per 24 h, 20 patients (10 in each group) will be required for the study to detect a mean difference of 10 mg of morphine between the two groups

Secondary outcome measures include: Pain evaluation with the use of VAS at rest, VAS on walking and on knee flexion; functional outcome evaluation with the 6 min walk tests, degree of knee flexion, Scores obtained in self-assessment questionaire (WOMAC-Western Ontario and McMaster University questionaire for knee osteoarthritis and CHAMPS-Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors). These values will be compared with baseline values recorded before surgery.

It is hypothesized that PRF and TRF of the saphenous nerve and genicular nerves to the knee joint can improve the early and late functional recovery and the pain control after TKA when compared with the CACB

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency

In this group of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (allocation of patients is randomized), Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is applied to the saphenous nerve of the knee, associated to Continuous Radiofrequency (TRF) applied to the genicular nerves of the knee . A sham catheter is inserted in the mid-tigh to simulate a continuous adductor canal block, and connected to an infusion of normal saline (assessor and patient blinded to the treatment)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preoperative pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve and Continuous radiofrequency of the genicular nerves of the knee joint.

The saphenous nerve will be approached at the adductor canal and it will be treated with Pulsed RF for 4 minutes at 42 Celsius degrees. Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml with Dexamethasone 10mg will be injected after the RF.

The Genicular terminal branches of the sciatic and femoral nerves will be treated with Continuous RF for 3 min at 80 Celsius degrees and then with 2 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% and 10 mg of Methylprednisolone to each nerve (5 in total) A sham catheter in the mid-thigh will be placed for patients in the RF group, infusing Normal Saline 0.9% and simulating a Continuous Adductor Canal Block. To blind the investigator to the type of treatment for the postoperative assessment , every solution bag will be prepared by the Pharmacy of the Hospital, covered with a plastic envelope and labeled as "Study Solution".

Continuous adductor canal block

Continuous Adductor Canal Block

Continuous adductor canal block is performed in this group of patients, with a catheter infusing ropivacaine 0.2% in the first 48 hours after surgery.

The solutions bags are labelled in order to make assessor and patients, blinded to the treatment (Ropivacaine vs Normal Saline)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type DRUG

The patients in the Adductor canal group, will have a catheter for peripheral nerve block inserted under strict asepsis in the adductor canal under ultrasound guidance, and will receive for postoperative analgesia a 48-h continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0.2% at 8 ml/hour The patients will receive, intraoperatively 10 mg of Dexamethasone i.v.

To blind the investigator who will do the postoperative assessment to the type of treatment, every solution bag will be prepared by the Pharmacy of the Hospital, covered with a plastic envelope and labeled as "Study Solution". It will be always possible to crack the code and find out to which group the patient belongs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency

Preoperative pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve and Continuous radiofrequency of the genicular nerves of the knee joint.

The saphenous nerve will be approached at the adductor canal and it will be treated with Pulsed RF for 4 minutes at 42 Celsius degrees. Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml with Dexamethasone 10mg will be injected after the RF.

The Genicular terminal branches of the sciatic and femoral nerves will be treated with Continuous RF for 3 min at 80 Celsius degrees and then with 2 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% and 10 mg of Methylprednisolone to each nerve (5 in total) A sham catheter in the mid-thigh will be placed for patients in the RF group, infusing Normal Saline 0.9% and simulating a Continuous Adductor Canal Block. To blind the investigator to the type of treatment for the postoperative assessment , every solution bag will be prepared by the Pharmacy of the Hospital, covered with a plastic envelope and labeled as "Study Solution".

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous Adductor Canal Block

The patients in the Adductor canal group, will have a catheter for peripheral nerve block inserted under strict asepsis in the adductor canal under ultrasound guidance, and will receive for postoperative analgesia a 48-h continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0.2% at 8 ml/hour The patients will receive, intraoperatively 10 mg of Dexamethasone i.v.

To blind the investigator who will do the postoperative assessment to the type of treatment, every solution bag will be prepared by the Pharmacy of the Hospital, covered with a plastic envelope and labeled as "Study Solution". It will be always possible to crack the code and find out to which group the patient belongs

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PRF CACB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of knee Osteoarthritis requiring Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous TKA (revision surgery)
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) Classification \> 3
* Known Rheumatologic disease
* Morbid Obesity (BMI \> 45)
* Inability to perform simple physical tasks (6 minutes walk test, Timed-Up and Go test)
* Organ transplant, Allergy to opioids, to local anesthetics or other medications used in the study,
* Chronic use of opioids or sedatives, Contraindication to receive regional anesthesia (e.g. coagulation defect), contraindication to Patient Controlled Analgesia pump (PCA) or inability to use PCA or to comprehend pain scales
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

JF Asenjo

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francesco Carli, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mc Gill Univeristy Health Center

Juan Francisco Asenjo, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mc Gill Univeristy Health Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Patterson ME, Bland KS, Thomas LC, Elliott CE, Soberon JR Jr, Nossaman BD, Osteen K. The adductor canal block provides effective analgesia similar to a femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty--a retrospective study. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Feb;27(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25468584 (View on PubMed)

Machi AT, Sztain JF, Kormylo NJ, Madison SJ, Abramson WB, Monahan AM, Khatibi B, Ball ST, Gonzales FB, Sessler DI, Mascha EJ, You J, Nakanote KA, Ilfeld BM. Discharge Readiness after Tricompartment Knee Arthroplasty: Adductor Canal versus Femoral Continuous Nerve Blocks-A Dual-center, Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):444-56. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000741.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26079800 (View on PubMed)

Carli F, Clemente A, Asenjo JF, Kim DJ, Mistraletti G, Gomarasca M, Morabito A, Tanzer M. Analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: periarticular infiltration vs continuous femoral nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Aug;105(2):185-95. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq112. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20551021 (View on PubMed)

Shah NA, Jain NP. Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25041873 (View on PubMed)

Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24121608 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-209-MUHC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radiofrequency Ablation After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05473663 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA