Continuous TAP Blocks: Relative Effects of a Basal Infusion vs. Repeated Bolus Doses
NCT ID: NCT02662023
Last Updated: 2021-03-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT00944151
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Microsurgical Breast Recon w/Abdominal Free Flap in Breast CA
NCT02601027
TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control
NCT02652156
Comparative Study of Two Different Techniques to Perform TAP-blocks
NCT02571439
TAPB vs. Caudal for Lower Abdominal Surgery in Children: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02160821
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Volunteers will be solicited using the CTRI Research Match and an existing database of volunteers (IRB approved). If a volunteer meets inclusion/exclusion criteria (see Eligibility Criteria) and desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a UCSD IRB-approved/stamped ICF. A urine pregnancy test will be administered to all women of childbearing age following written informed consent but before any study interventions. This urine test will be administered by CTRI nursing staff using standard, FDA-approved urine pregnancy testing devices.
Perineural catheter insertion: Following written, informed consent, subjects will be admitted to the UCSD CTRI Center for Clinical Research Services (CCR) and have demographic/morphometric data recorded (e.g., age, weight, height). An intravenous line will be placed in an upper extremity, followed by external monitors (pulse oximeter, blood pressure, and EKG), and oxygen by nasal cannula. Sedation will be provided with intravenous fentanyl (50 μg) and/or midazolam (1 mg). Bilateral TAP perineural catheters (FlexBlock, Teleflex Medical, Reading, PA, USA) will be inserted using ultrasound guidance using a technique previously described. To check the perineural catheter placement accuracy, 5 mL of normal saline will be administered via the catheters under ultrasound guidance with the definition of a successful catheter insertion an increase in fluid volume within the TAP (the plane between the transversus abdominis muscle and internal oblique muscle). Inaccurately inserted catheters will be replaced.
Treatment Group Assignment: Subjects will act as their own controls: the right side will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: ropivacaine 0.2% administration as either a basal infusion (8 mL/h) or bolus doses (24 mL administered every 3 hours). The left side will receive the other possible treatment. Randomization will be based on computer-generated codes. Randomization will be in blocks of four. An infusion pump with study infusate will be attached to each of the perineural catheters and initiated at Hour 0. Which side of the participant's body will receive the basal rate and which side will receive bolus volume will depend upon the treatment group assignment but the total dose of local anesthetic is the same for each side.
The tubing from the pumps to the subjects will be gently wound at least 5 rotations and covered with opaque tape, masking which perineural catheter is receiving which treatment (ropivacaine is clear, so the flow through the clear tubing from the tape to the perineural catheters will not be visually distinguishable).
Local Anesthetic Administration: The infusion pump administering the basal infusion will be initiated at Hour 0. The infusion pump administering bolus doses will administer a 24 mL bolus dose every 3 hours beginning at Hour 0. Perineural catheters will be removed after 6 hours (a total of 2 bolus doses).
Food and Drink: Both food and accompanying beverages/water will be provided by the hospital and served by the nursing staff immediately following catheter insertion. Meals will be provided without charge to the study subjects. There is no restriction on oral intake following catheter insertion. Subjects will remain within the CTRI-CCR until catheter withdrawal.
Outcome measurements: At all time points, the right side will be measured first, followed by the left side (subjects in the supine position).
Measurements will be performed at baseline (prior to local anesthetic administration), after 6 hours of administration, and at each hour in between for a total of 7 time points:
* Hour 0 (baseline) just prior to local anesthetic administration
* Hours 1 and 2
* Hour 3, just prior to the scheduled bolus dose at Hour 3
* Hours 4 and 5
* Hour 6
The sensory deficit will be measured using two methods:
* von Frey filaments (mechanical detection threshold)
* Cold roller (cold deficit)
The sensory deficit will be measured along two separate anatomical lines at each time point:
* The mid-axillary "vertical" line (measuring cephalad-caudad effects)
* A transverse "horizontal" line passing through the anterior superior iliac spine (measuring anterior-posterior effects)
Statistical analysis: The investigators' calculations are focused on the primary hypothesis that when using transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block perineural catheters, providing local anesthetic in repeated bolus doses increases the cephalad-caudad local anesthetic effects compared with a basal-only infusion of the same volume and dose of local anesthetic. To measure cephalad-caudad local anesthetic effects, we will measure the cephalad-caudad sensory deficit to cold temperature in centimeters along the mid-axillary line. The primary end point will be this measurement after 6 hours of local anesthetic administration (6 hours of a continuous basal infusion or 2 bolus doses at 3-hour increments, the last being 3 hours prior to the measurement of the primary endpoint). Each subject will act as their own control with each side receiving a different treatment. Normality of distribution will be determined using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test (Prism 6, GraphPad, San Diego, California). For normally distributed data, comparisons for parametric and nonparametric data will be tested using the t-test or Mann-Whitney test and presented as mean (SD) or median \[interquartile\], respectively. Nominal data will be analyzed using the Pearson Chi square test. P\<0.05 will be considered significant.
Sample size estimation: With 21 evaluable subjects we will have 80% power at the 0.05 significance level to detect the superiority of the administration of local anesthetic as repeated bolus doses as compared with a continuous basal infusion at Hour 6 (primary outcome). Using an expected standard deviation of 7 cm for the primary endpoint, and given a 2-sided Type I error protection of 0.05 and power=0.80, approximately 21 subjects in each treatment arm will be required to detect a difference between treatment group means of 6 cm. Since this is a split-body study design and each subject will have one of each treatments on opposite sides of the body, 21 subjects total will produce 21 subjects in each treatment arm. The investigators chose 6 cm as a detectable treatment difference because a 3 cm distance is approximately equivalent to the width of one dermatome, and the vast majority of anesthesiologists would consider a 2-dermatome difference clinically significant. To allow for a larger-than-anticipated standard deviations, smaller-than-anticipated difference between treatment means, drop out subjects, or failed catheters, the investigators will enroll a total of 24 subjects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RIGHT side BOLUS and left side basal
Bilateral transversus abdominis catheters were inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered concurrently. For the right catheter, the ropivacaine was administered as two separate bolus doses of 24 mL each: one at time point zero and one 3 hours later. For the left catheter, the ropivacaine was administered as a continuous basal infusion (8 mL/h) from time point zero for the following 6 hours
Bolus
A transversus abdominis catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered as two separate bolus doses of 24 mL each: one at time point zero and one 3 hours later.
Basal
A transversus abdominis catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered as a continuous basal infusion (8 mL/h) from time point zero for the following 6 hours.
RIGHT side BASAL and left side bolus
Bilateral transversus abdominis catheters were inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered concurrently. For the right catheter, the ropivacaine was administered as a continuous basal infusion (8 mL/h) from time point zero for the following 6 hours. For the left catheter, the ropivacaine was administered as two separate bolus doses of 24 mL each: one at time point zero and one 3 hours later
Bolus
A transversus abdominis catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered as two separate bolus doses of 24 mL each: one at time point zero and one 3 hours later.
Basal
A transversus abdominis catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered as a continuous basal infusion (8 mL/h) from time point zero for the following 6 hours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bolus
A transversus abdominis catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered as two separate bolus doses of 24 mL each: one at time point zero and one 3 hours later.
Basal
A transversus abdominis catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.2% administered as a continuous basal infusion (8 mL/h) from time point zero for the following 6 hours.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. must be willing to have bilateral transverses abdominis plane nerve block catheters be placed with subsequent ropivacaine administration and sensory testing for 6 hours
Exclusion Criteria
2. regular opioid use within the previous 2 months;
3. previous participation within the same study;
4. allergy to study medications;
5. known renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dL);
6. pregnancy;
7. incarceration; and
8. any known neuro-muscular deficit of either abdominal wall.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zyno Medical
INDUSTRY
Teleflex
INDUSTRY
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS
Professor of Anesthesiology, In Residence
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian Ilfeld, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ucsd Ctri
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):904-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182285e01. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):436-41. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181e66702.
Stoving K, Rothe C, Rosenstock CV, Aasvang EK, Lundstrom LH, Lange KH. Cutaneous Sensory Block Area, Muscle-Relaxing Effect, and Block Duration of the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: A Randomized, Blinded, and Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):355-62. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000252.
Borglum J, Jensen K, Christensen AF, Hoegberg LC, Johansen SS, Lonnqvist PA, Jansen T. Distribution patterns, dermatomal anesthesia, and ropivacaine serum concentrations after bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):294-301. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31824c20a9.
Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Bergin D, Laffey JG, Mc Donnell JG. Studies on the spread of local anaesthetic solution in transversus abdominis plane blocks. Anaesthesia. 2011 Nov;66(11):1023-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06855.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Khatibi B, Said ET, Sztain JF, Monahan AM, Gabriel RA, Furnish TJ, Tran JT, Donohue MC, Ilfeld BM. Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Blocks: Does Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method-Automatic Repeated Bolus Versus Continuous Basal Infusion-Influence the Extent of Sensation to Cold?: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Crossover Study in Volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1298-1303. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001939.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TAP Basal vs. Bolus
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.