Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Pain Relieve in Children Undergoing Groin Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00970086

Last Updated: 2015-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For surgery in the region of the lower abdominal wall the administration of local anesthetic drugs in the epidural space via the caudal route is the preferentially used technique since several decades.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block features the advantages of a peripheral nerve blockade. The aim of this study is to evaluate potential differences in the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia and to test the hypotheses that the duration of pain relieve ist prolonged after a TAP block when compared with an epidural technique.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Caudal block (CB) is the gold standard technique for analgesia in children undergoing surgical interventions in the groin.

Although the efficacy and the safety of this technique is high, nonetheless, there are several caveats such as unwarranted motor blockade of the lower limbs and disturbances of the bladder function, potentially resulting in delayed demission in the ambulatory setting. The effect of the blockade wears off within 4-5h post-block, making the administration of additional pain medication necessary.

Peripheral nerve blockades (PNB) are an alternative to CB and have a prolonged duration of the analgesic effect. More recently, an alternative method to block neural structures which innervate lower abdominal wall has been described; the transverse abdominal plane block. The ultrasound guided technique improves the safety of margin. However, although this new technique seems to offer substantial advantages so far only experience from small case series are available. In particular, the TAP block has not been compared in a systematic trial with the "gold standard", the caudal block.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Reaction; Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

transversus abdominal plane block

Caudal block: Identification of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique. Administration of Bupivacain 1ml/kg 0.125%.

Transversus abdominal plane block: Identification of the anatomical structures with ultrasound, insertion of the stimuplex needle G22, 50mm, in an in-plane approach and administration of 0.4ml/kg levobupivacaine 0.25%.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacain/levobupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Caudal block: Identification of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique. Administration of Bupivacain 1ml/kg 0.125%.

Transversus abdominal plane block: Identification of the anatomical structures by the ultrasound technique, administration of 0.4ml/kg levobupivacaine 0.25%.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacain/levobupivacaine

Caudal block: Identification of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique. Administration of Bupivacain 1ml/kg 0.125%.

Transversus abdominal plane block: Identification of the anatomical structures by the ultrasound technique, administration of 0.4ml/kg levobupivacaine 0.25%.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female children aged 2 - 8 years
* physical status classification system (ASA) score I or II
* Undergoing surgical interventions in the groin (hernia repair, funiculocele ectomy)

Exclusion Criteria

* Hypersensitivity to Levobupivacaine
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Erb, PD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Childrens Hospital of both Basel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Childrens Hospital of both Basel

Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UKBB_ANA_TAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id