Transversus Abdominis Plane Block vs Continuous Infiltration Wound Catheter for Analgesia After Caesarean Section
NCT ID: NCT03102515
Last Updated: 2020-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
109 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-29
2016-10-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Studies have evaluated continuous wound infiltration catheters (CIC) and ultrasound-guided (UGD) transabdominis plane (TAP) block, and both techniques and both techniques reduce postoperative morphine consumption. Recent studies have compared the two techniques and found conflicting results. Furthermore, they did not consider caesarean section performed under epidural analgesia, with a different neuraxial injection site, neither did they compared pain after postoperative day 2.
Consequently, the aim of this study was to compare resting and standing pain up to postoperative day 3 after caesarean section performed under spinal or epidural anaesthesia and receiving either USG-TAP block or CIC. Baseline hypothesis was that the continuous infiltration provided a better analgesia at day 2.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analgesic Efficacy of Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks for Caesarean Section.
NCT06324942
Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT00944151
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Caesarean Section - Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT01931215
Comparison of Epidural and TAP Block in Abdominal Surgery
NCT01848951
Pharmacokinetics of BPV Following Bilateral US-guided TAP Block for C-section
NCT03006042
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal-anesthesia
Caesarean section performed under spinal anaesthesia and receiving either USG-TAP block or CIC
USG-TAP block
CIC
Epidural-anesthesia
Caesarean section performed under epidural anaesthesia and receiving either USG-TAP block or CIC
USG-TAP block
CIC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
USG-TAP block
CIC
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age\>/=18 years,
* Caesarean section under spinal or epidural anaesthesia
* Technique surgical "Cohen Stark méthod".
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient under guardianship,
* Contraindication to one of the two techniques,
* Cesarean section under general anesthesia
* Allergies to local anesthetics
* Maternal instability
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-A00131-50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.