Analgesic Efficacy of Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks for Caesarean Section.
NCT ID: NCT06324942
Last Updated: 2025-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-19
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Post Caesarian Pain
NCT01986049
TAP Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine for Post-cesarean Delivery Analgesia- Walking Towards Recovery
NCT04393207
Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block After Cesarean Delivery
NCT01170702
Pharmacokinetics of BPV Following Bilateral US-guided TAP Block for C-section
NCT03006042
Efficacy of the Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) Block for Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia
NCT00573963
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP block)
After uterine closure, the anterior abdominal wall on the contralateral side to the surgeon is elevated and retracted laterally by an assistant. The bowel and uterus is retracted using the surgeon's non-dominant hand, with or without a sponge. Under direct visualization, a blunted spinal needle is inserted lateral to the rectus muscle to avoid injury to inferior epigastric blood vessels. The needle is then gently advanced through the transversus abdominis fascia into the TAP plane, identified at loss of resistance, or 'a pop'. After aspiration to confirm no accidental placement of the needle intravascularly, local anaesthetic is infiltrated into the transverse abdominis plane through the parietal peritoneum by the surgeon at a prespecified dose of 0.25% bupivicaine 0.25 mL/kg (approximately 20cc). This is repeated on the contralateral side, after which closure of the fascia, subcutaneous tissue, and skin were performed.
Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block 0.25% bupivicaine 0.25 mL/kg
Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
No TAP block
A sham procedure will not be performed but the patient will be unaware of whether or not an injection was done.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block 0.25% bupivicaine 0.25 mL/kg
Surgeon-administered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients undergoing elective CS under regional anesthesia at any gestational age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Planned general anesthetic
* NSAID use contraindicated post partum
* Chronic pain disorder or chronic narcotic use/dependence
* Planned vertical abdominal incision
* Planned Cesarean Hysterectomy.
* Placenta Previa or suspected Placenta Accreta
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephen Wood
Dr Stephen Wood
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen Wood, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB24-0349
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.