Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
NCT ID: NCT02660398
Last Updated: 2019-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Influence of Neuromuscular Block on Mask Ventilation
NCT01849211
Quality of Recovery After Reversal With Neostigmine or Sugammadex.
NCT02909439
Management of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents and Their Antagonism
NCT06238219
Provider Variability in the Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs and Reversal
NCT03585348
Rocuronium + Sugammadex vs. Succinylcholine + Cisatracurium + Neostigmine/Atropine in Obese Participants (MK-8616-104)
NCT02410590
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who have surgery and receive general anesthesia often receive muscle relaxants called neuromuscular blocking drugs or NMBDs. NMBDs facilitate anesthesiologists' performance of tracheal intubation, provide muscle relaxation during surgery, and are sometimes administered to prevent movement. After surgery, an anesthesiologist monitors how the muscle relaxants wear off, and gives a drug to help reverse the effect of the NMBDs before the tracheal breathing tube is removed and a patient is awakened and taken to the postoperative care area (PACU).
A patient who receives NMBDs for their routine care can experience a leftover effect of the drug after their general anesthesia wears off. This condition is called Residual Neuromuscular Blockade. The management of NMBDs in patients for routine care vary by anesthesia provider. This study will explore if the use of a specific plan to managing muscle relaxants will help decrease the risk of muscle weakness after general anesthesia. Anesthesiologists routinely use peripheral nerve stimulators to assess the degree of muscle relaxation. Very commonly a series of 4 electrical stimulations are given over 2 seconds and each stimulation result in a twitch of the thumb when the ulnar nerve is stimulated at the wrist. This is called train-of-four (TOF) monitoring. When the patient is deeply relaxed, then all twitches are not present but as the drug effect diminishes over time, the twitches return. When 4 twitches are present, an exact measurement of the so-called TOF ratio can be calculated if an objective monitor is used. The ratio is the strength of the fourth twitch divided by the strength of the first twitch. The most commonly used reversal drug is neostigmine and it is known from previous research that it works more effectively if the muscle relaxation is not profound. In the intervention group, the investigators will confirm that the neuromuscular blockade has spontaneously recovered to a level where all 4 thumb twitches are present before neostigmine is administered.
All patients will have objective measurements obtained using the FDA approved monitor TOF-Watch SX. This monitor will be applied at the beginning of each case and will be calibrated immediately after induction of anesthesia. This is a simple automated process that takes less than 1 minute. The investigators will also obtain a TOF ratio measurement at the beginning of the case, before a muscle relaxant has been administered. This initial measurement allows for normalization of postoperative measurements. Measurement will be obtained again at the time of extubation, i.e. the removal of the breathing tube, which usually occurs in the operating room as the patient is awakened after surgery. Patients are routinely transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) within minutes of being extubated and shortly after arrival to the PACU, the anesthesiologists transfers the care to PACU RNs. The investigators will obtain one more TOF-ratio measurement when the patient has just arrived to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Controls
Our control group will consist of an observational cohort of 40 patients in whom we will make quantitative assessments of the Train-of-four ratio (TOF ratio). This is done using the TOF-Watch SX monitor. The monitor will be calibrated after induction of general anesthesia, measurement of the TOF ratio will be obtained at time of extubation and again at the time of arrival to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
The intervention consists of a protocol for intraoperative management of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium and reversal with neostigmine. A train-of-four count of 4 at the thumb will be confirmed prior to administration of an adjusted dose of neostigmine. TOF ratio is measured in the same manner as for the Control group, it is done using the TOF-Watch SX monitor. The monitor will be calibrated after induction of general anesthesia, measurement of the TOF ratio will be obtained at time of extubation and again at the time of arrival to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
Standardized NMBD Management
The intervention phase will introduce a standardized research protocol that spells out NMBD management, including how muscle relaxant should be administered and monitored, and how reversal with neostigmine should be done.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standardized NMBD Management
The intervention phase will introduce a standardized research protocol that spells out NMBD management, including how muscle relaxant should be administered and monitored, and how reversal with neostigmine should be done.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Will undergo open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery expected to last \<6 hours at HMC or UWMC
* Have ASA physical status I-III
* Scheduled to have general anesthesia with at least 1 dose of nondepolarizing NMBD for endotracheal intubation or maintenance of neuromuscular block (NMB)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with neuromuscular disease (myasthenia gravis or muscular dystrophy)
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Non-English speaking
* Unable to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephan Thilen
Assistant Professor, Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephan Thilen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Thilen SR, Ng IC, Cain KC, Treggiari MM, Bhananker SM. Management of rocuronium neuromuscular block using a protocol for qualitative monitoring and reversal with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 May 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
50608
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.