Pilot Study: Rectus Sheath Blocks for Improving Abdominal Surgery Conditions

NCT ID: NCT02447965

Last Updated: 2017-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-01

Study Completion Date

2016-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to show that the use of preoperative rectus sheath blocks can ultimately alleviate the need for using nondepolarizing muscle relaxants during certain abdominal procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patients in the active group will be taken to the operating room and standard american society of anesthesiologists monitors will be applied. After induction of general anesthesia, the ultrasonographic anatomy of the umbilical region will be studied in each patient. The probe will be adjusted until optimum view of both rectus abdominis muscles, their sheaths and surrounding structures are identified. Once the umbilical region anatomy has been identified the puncture sites will be determined. The puncture sites will be aseptically prepped, the ultrasound probed will be covered with a sterile tegaderm, and sterile ultrasound gel will be used on the field. A 21-g EchoStim echogenic needle will be used. The needle will be inserted in the long axis parallel to the ultrasound probe. The needle will be advanced carefully until the needle tip is seen between the posterior aspect of the rectus muscle and its sheath. After a confirmed negative aspiration, 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be inserted in 2 ml increments, aspirating in between.

The placebo group will have the exact same procedure performed except 15 ml of normal saline will be injected in each rectus sheath instead of 0.25% bupivacaine. For all patients, when the block has been completed the surgery team will then prep the patient and proceed with the planned operation. The surgery staff and anesthesia providers taking care of the patient in the operating room will be unaware of the patient's group. At this point, all patients will be treated exactly the same. For intubation purposes, all patients will only receive succinylcholine. After intubation, elimination of the succinylcholine dose will be determined using a twitch monitor on the ulnar nerve. If at any point during the surgery, the surgery team needs more muscle relaxation then the anesthesia staff will give appropriate medications.

The first step will be to administer propofol 50mg IV, if hemodynamics allow, and to verify that the patient has 1.0-1.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of volatile anesthetic. If the patient is not at 1.0 MAC, then the volatile anesthetic should be increased. If this does not provide sufficient relaxation, then a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant will be given in 10mg increments titrated to a train of four of 2 twitches at the ulnar nerve. All patients will receive ofirmev and fentanyl in the operating room for pain control. Ofirmev 1000mg will be given pre-incision to each patient and 1.5 mcg/kg loading dose of fentanyl will be given to each patient. Fentanyl will be redosed in 50mcg increments for a 20% increase in blood pressure or heart rate above preinduction values that is sustained for 5 minutes despite an adequate depth of anesthesia, defined as 1 MAC or greater.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia Pain, Postoperative Abdominal Wall Relaxation After Rectus Sheath Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine

Will have 20ml of bupivacaine injected into each rectus sheath.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Using ultrasound guidance bupivacaine will be injected into the active group's rectus abdominis sheath.

Normal Saline

Will have 20ml of normal saline injected into each rectus sheath.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Using ultrasound guidance normal saline will be injected into the placebo group's rectus abdominis sheath.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

Using ultrasound guidance bupivacaine will be injected into the active group's rectus abdominis sheath.

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal Saline

Using ultrasound guidance normal saline will be injected into the placebo group's rectus abdominis sheath.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled to undergo an abdominal procedure with a periumbilical or midline incision above the umbilicus
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1 to 3

Exclusion Criteria

* Known coagulopathy
* Preexisting muscular disease
* Medical conditions contraindicated to bupivacaine, succinylcholine or other medication used in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew G Cain, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arkansas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univerisity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kimura F, Oishi M, Yakoshi C, Ogasawara C, Ishihara H, Hirota K. [Rectus sheath block and transversus abdominis plane block for a patient with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome undergoing low anterior resection]. Masui. 2013 Aug;62(8):989-91. Japanese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23984583 (View on PubMed)

Quek KH, Phua DS. Bilateral rectus sheath blocks as the single anaesthetic technique for an open infraumbilical hernia repair. Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):e39-41. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014042.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24664392 (View on PubMed)

Bashandy GM, Elkholy AH. Reducing postoperative opioid consumption by adding an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block to multimodal analgesia for abdominal cancer surgery with midline incision. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Aug 10;4(3):e18263. doi: 10.5812/aapm.18263. eCollection 2014 Aug.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25289373 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

203780

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cranial Blocks for Postoperative Anesthesia
NCT04749797 TERMINATED PHASE4
Reversal of General Anesthesia With Methylphenidate
NCT02051452 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2