A Stress Reduction Program for Companies

NCT ID: NCT02660307

Last Updated: 2018-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This protocol proposes a well-being program based in stress reduction program for employees of a company.

objectives: To evaluate the effects of a stress reduction program with a specific orientation for workers and taught to them within their companies.

Methods: Participants with stress complaints were recruited and randomized into two groups: group 1 (G1) received the intervention while group 2 (G2) did not. Both groups were evaluated before the intervention (time 1 - T1); again after the eight weeks of the program for G1 (time 2 - T2); and then at the end of a second eight-week period during which G2 received the intervention and G1 was simply instructed to maintain the practice they had learned without further instruction (time 3- T3).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Disorders resulting from chronic stress are some of the main causes of absenteeism and reduced productivity in companies. A number of successful stress management programs are based on the principle of mindfulness and may help individuals to relieve stress symptoms and to improve well-being and pro-social behavior. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a weekly one-hour stress reduction program adapted for companies and if the possible benefits would be sustained 8 weeks after the end of the program. Participants with stress complaints were recruited in two companies and they were randomized into two groups: in the first period of the study, group 1 (G1) N=23 received the intervention while group 2 (G2) N=18 did not. Both groups were evaluated before the intervention (time 1 - T1); again after the eight weeks of the program for G1 (time 2 - T2); and then at the end of a second eight-week period during which G2 received the intervention and G1 was simply instructed to maintain the practice they had learned without further instruction (time 3- T3).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PROGRESS group

this group received the intervention based in meditation in the first 8 weeks. They were instructed to practice at least 5 times a week for up to half an hour a day. During the second 8 week period this group were left to manage their practice on their own.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PROGRESS group

Intervention Type OTHER

control group

this group received no intervention in the first 8 weeks. During the second 8 week period, this group received the same intervention based in meditation that received PROGRESS group.

Group Type OTHER

PROGRESS group

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PROGRESS group

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* workers with stress complaints aging from 18 to 60 years. They also had to have at least 8 years of education.

Exclusion Criteria

* participants with a history of psychiatric or neurological disorders or who were under psychological or psychiatric treatment during the period of the study, or with a history of substance abuse, with the exception of tobacco.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SESI (Serviço Social da Indústria)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centro de estudos em Atenção Plena

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephen William Little Me

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

stephen Little Me

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centro de estudos em Atenção Plena

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lacerda SS, Little SW, Kozasa EH. A Stress Reduction Program Adapted for the Work Environment: A Randomized Controlled Trial With a Follow-Up. Front Psychol. 2018 May 9;9:668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00668. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29867646 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PROGRESS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stress Interventions in STEM and Non-STEM
NCT05376306 COMPLETED PHASE1
Understanding Everyday Stress
NCT05502575 COMPLETED PHASE2