Comparison of Feeding Strategies for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Infants
NCT ID: NCT02657629
Last Updated: 2016-02-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-12-31
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of a New Formula on the Growth, Safety and Tolerance of Infants With Growth Failure
NCT03563391
High Energy Formula Feeding in Infants With Congenital Heart Disease
NCT01850784
Clinical and Biological Outcomes of Human Milk and Formula Intake After Gastroschisis Repair
NCT02575846
Growth of Healthy Term Infants Fed a Partially Hydrolyzed Follow-up Formula
NCT03276663
Feeding Tolerance in Preterm Infants
NCT00450697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Infants with HLHS/SVV demonstrate progressive growth failure after stage 1 procedures, which appears to stabilize only after stage 2 procedures. Poor nutritional status increases risk for post-operative infections, extends hospital length-of-stay, and adversely affects neurodevelopmental outcomes.
To date, evidence-based feeding strategies that support adequate weight gain and improve nutritional status have not been identified after stage 1 procedures. Continuous enteral feeding regimens have resulted in improved growth in a diverse population of infants with congenital heart disease and have been shown to decrease energy expenditure in premature infants and adults. A randomized, controlled study of HLHS/SVV infants who underwent stage 1 procedures at a single medical center was conducted with the primary objective of comparing weight gain at hospital discharge between infants receiving a continuous feeding regimen versus an intermittent feeding regimen. Secondary objectives were to compare growth and markers of nutritional status at hospital discharge between the two groups. The investigators hypothesized that infants with HLHS/SVV who receive a continuous enteral feeding regimen versus an intermittent feeding regimen will demonstrate improved weight gain, growth, and nutritional status after stage 1 procedures at hospital discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Feeding Regimen
Enteral feedings given as combination of continuous nocturnal feedings and intermittent bolus daytime feedings.
Continuous Feeding Regimen
Nocturnal continuous enteral feedings given from 8pm-8am with intermittent bolus feedings every 3 hours between 11am and 5pm. Continuous feedings given via gavage (nasogastric tube, orogastric tube or gastrostomy tube) and intermittent bolus feeds via gavage or nipple. Total caloric intake maintained at 120-130 kcal/kg/d.
Intermittent Bolus Feeding Regimen
Enteral feedings given as intermittent bolus feedings for entire 24 hour period.
Intermittent Bolus Feeding Regimen
Intermittent bolus enteral feedings given after 3 hours for entire 24 hours period. Feedings given via gavage or nipple. Total caloric intake maintained at 120-130 kcal/kg/d.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Feeding Regimen
Nocturnal continuous enteral feedings given from 8pm-8am with intermittent bolus feedings every 3 hours between 11am and 5pm. Continuous feedings given via gavage (nasogastric tube, orogastric tube or gastrostomy tube) and intermittent bolus feeds via gavage or nipple. Total caloric intake maintained at 120-130 kcal/kg/d.
Intermittent Bolus Feeding Regimen
Intermittent bolus enteral feedings given after 3 hours for entire 24 hours period. Feedings given via gavage or nipple. Total caloric intake maintained at 120-130 kcal/kg/d.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
\- Subjects in whom a nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube was not required for feeding at the time of enrollment and/or who were transferred to outside institutions for recovery after surgery.
3 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicole Spillane
Pediatric Fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ganga Krishnamurthy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Slicker J, Hehir DA, Horsley M, Monczka J, Stern KW, Roman B, Ocampo EC, Flanagan L, Keenan E, Lambert LM, Davis D, Lamonica M, Rollison N, Heydarian H, Anderson JB; Feeding Work Group of the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative. Nutrition algorithms for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome; birth through the first interstage period. Congenit Heart Dis. 2013 Mar-Apr;8(2):89-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2012.00705.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
Wolovits JS, Torzone A. Feeding and nutritional challenges in infants with single ventricle physiology. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012 Jun;24(3):295-300. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835356ae.
Grant J, Denne SC. Effect of intermittent versus continuous enteral feeding on energy expenditure in premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991 Jun;118(6):928-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82213-9.
Heymsfield SB, Casper K, Grossman GD. Bioenergetic and metabolic response to continuous v intermittent nasoenteric feeding. Metabolism. 1987 Jun;36(6):570-5. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(87)90169-7.
Ravishankar C, Zak V, Williams IA, Bellinger DC, Gaynor JW, Ghanayem NS, Krawczeski CD, Licht DJ, Mahony L, Newburger JW, Pemberton VL, Williams RV, Sananes R, Cook AL, Atz T, Khaikin S, Hsu DT; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Association of impaired linear growth and worse neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with single ventricle physiology: a report from the pediatric heart network infant single ventricle trial. J Pediatr. 2013 Feb;162(2):250-6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.048. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
Hehir DA, Cooper DS, Walters EM, Ghanayem NS. Feeding, growth, nutrition, and optimal interstage surveillance for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2011 Dec;21 Suppl 2:59-64. doi: 10.1017/S1047951111001600.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAE0781
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.