Safety and Efficacy of SOF/VEL/VOX FDC for 12 Weeks and SOF/VEL for 12 Weeks in DAA-Experienced Adults With Chronic HCV Infection Who Have Not Received an NS5A Inhibitor

NCT ID: NCT02639247

Last Updated: 2019-03-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

333 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-23

Study Completion Date

2017-01-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (Vosevi®; SOF/VEL/VOX) fixed-dose combination (FDC) for 12 weeks and of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (Epclusa®; SOF/VEL) FDC for 12 weeks in direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-experienced adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with or without cirrhosis who have not received prior treatment with a regimen containing an inhibitor of the HCV NS5A protein.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SOF/VEL/VOX

SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SOF/VEL/VOX

Intervention Type DRUG

400/100/100 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily with food

SOF/VEL

SOF/VEL for 12 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SOF/VEL

Intervention Type DRUG

400/100 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily without regard to food

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SOF/VEL/VOX

400/100/100 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily with food

Intervention Type DRUG

SOF/VEL

400/100 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily without regard to food

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vosevi® GS-7977/GS-5816/GS-9857 Epclusa® GS-7977/GS-5816

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Willing and able to provide written informed consent
* HCV RNA ≥ 10\^4 IU/mL at screening
* Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months)
* Treatment experienced with a direct acting antiviral medication not including a NS5A Inhibitor for HCV
* Use of protocol specified methods of contraception

Exclusion Criteria

* Current or prior history of clinically significant illness that may interfere with participation in the study
* Screening ECG with clinically significant abnormalities
* Laboratory results outside of acceptable ranges at screening
* Pregnant or nursing female
* Chronic liver disease not caused by HCV
* Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilead Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gilead Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Rialto, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Bastrop, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Catonsville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Hillsborough, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada France Germany New Zealand Puerto Rico United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bourliere M, Gordon SC, Flamm SL, Cooper CL, Ramji A, Tong M, Ravendhran N, Vierling JM, Tran TT, Pianko S, Bansal MB, de Ledinghen V, Hyland RH, Stamm LM, Dvory-Sobol H, Svarovskaia E, Zhang J, Huang KC, Subramanian GM, Brainard DM, McHutchison JG, Verna EC, Buggisch P, Landis CS, Younes ZH, Curry MP, Strasser SI, Schiff ER, Reddy KR, Manns MP, Kowdley KV, Zeuzem S; POLARIS-1 and POLARIS-4 Investigators. Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir for Previously Treated HCV Infection. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2134-2146. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613512.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28564569 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-003167-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GS-US-367-1170

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.