Uraemic Toxins in Chronic Kidney Disease Paediatric Patients: Interventional Study

NCT ID: NCT02634775

Last Updated: 2021-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) suffer from one of the most devastating diseases in childhood resulting in a lifelong need for health care, and a 3 times decreased life expectancy. In addition, they have important comorbidities that negatively impact on their quality of life and integration in society, jeopardizing their future even after a potential transplantation. Retention of uraemic toxins is accepted to play a major role in the pathogenesis of the comorbid conditions, but studies in children are lacking. Furthermore, there are currently no good tools to evaluate severity and monitor adequacy of treatment, resulting in suboptimal management.

The overall scientific objective of this four years UToPaed IWT-TBM project is to provide the clinician with new diagnostic and therapeutic tools for the management of children with CKD, based on the improved understanding of uraemic toxicity.

In UToPaed (part 1), the investigators will associate concentrations of a wide variety of uraemic toxins with different comorbidities in CKD children, i.e. growth, protein-energy wasting, quality of life, cardiovascular risk factors, circadian rhythm, sleep quality, and psychosocial and neurocognitive functioning (i.e. cross-sectional and longitudinal). Those toxins of which concentrations are best correlated with comorbidities during the progress of CKD and those having representative kinetics (UToPaed - part 2: Kinetic analysis) will be selected as markers. During this third part of UToPaed, these markers will be, together with the comorbidities, further tracked after interventions, i.e. starting on dialysis, transplantation, changes in dialysis strategy.

From the validated kinetic models (UToPaed - part 2 and 3), an open access user-friendly prediction simulator (PAEDSIM) based on patient characteristics and marker concentrations will be developed to optimise and individualise the dialysis therapy.

By providing clinicians with more advanced and appropriate tools to improve management of all children with CKD, i.e. better assessment of the degree of renal dysfunction, better determination of the ideal time to start renal replacement therapy, and more accurate monitoring of dialysis adequacy, the investigators aim to improve neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning (short term), growth, maturation into puberty, and social integration (median term) and survival (long term).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is an interventional multicenter study in children (≤ 18 years) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2 to 5D with or without renal replacement therapy. They will be followed for a total duration of 24 months.

Concentrations of the uraemic toxin markers and the different comorbidities will be followed after an intervention. Some interventions will just happen in the treatment of the CKD child: e.g. transplantation, start on dialysis, needed switch from PD to HD.

In the patients on PD, different approaches will be followed: more frequent exchanges overnight, PET-directed dialysis regimes, adapted PD, using a mix of short, small volume dwells, with longer, high volume dwells. These different strategies have so far only been tested using the classic adequacy parameters urea and creatinine. The intervention is that the children, as included in the longitudinal study, will be studied while on at least two different PD strategies, serving as their own control, whereby the strategy will be linked with the concentration of the uraemic toxin markers and comorbidities.

In the patients on HD, different dialysis strategies will be studied: conventional haemodialysis 3x/week, daily haemodialysis, haemodiafiltration 3x/week, nocturnal 8h dialysis 3x/week, and the optimal dialysis regime as derived from the kinetic analysis (UToPaed\_2). The intervention is that the children, as included in the longitudinal study, will be studied with at least 2 of the strategies, and that differences in plasma concentrations and removal rate of the uraemic toxin markers will be measured. The measured predialysis concentrations, time averaged concentrations (TACs), and total solute removal with the different strategies will be compared to the results of the kinetic simulations in order to validate the calibrated kinetic models of the uraemic toxin markers.

Based on the results, guidance on the most optimal dialysis strategy for each child will be developed, and the child will consequently be treated on that modality during 1 year, to allow evaluation of the longer term impact on quality of life, catch up growth, study results and emergence of new comorbidities.

The therapeutic tool comprises an open access user-friendly prediction simulator, based on the kinetics of the new markers (PAEDSIM) to simulate different dialysis strategies. With different patient characteristics and uraemic toxin concentrations as input for the simulation model, the program will derive the optimal dialysis strategy for the individual patient striving for low predialysis concentrations and TACs.

The clinical use of these findings will be promoted by the organisation of a 'CKD Academy' with workshops about the prediction simulator (PAEDSIM) and the related laboratory techniques (see utilisation strategies).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Kidney Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CKD - no dialysis

Change in treatment strategy: Start on dialysis, transplantation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Change in treatment strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Start on dialysis, transplantation, change of PD prescription, change of HD prescription

Patients on PD

Change in treatment strategy: Change of PD prescription, start on HD, transplantation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Change in treatment strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Start on dialysis, transplantation, change of PD prescription, change of HD prescription

Patients on HD

Change in treatment strategy: Change of HD prescription, transplantation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Change in treatment strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Start on dialysis, transplantation, change of PD prescription, change of HD prescription

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Change in treatment strategy

Start on dialysis, transplantation, change of PD prescription, change of HD prescription

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provide signed and dated informed consent form.
* Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
* Male or female, aged ≤ 18 years
* Diagnosed with chronic kidney disease stage 2 to 5D, according to the K/DOQI guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria

* N.A.
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sunny Eloot, Prof Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ghent University Hospital - Nephrology

Johan Vande Walle, Prof Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ghent University Hospital - Paediatric Nephrology

Ann Raes, Prof Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ghent University Hospital - Paediatric Nephrology

Wim Van Biesen, Prof Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ghent University Hospital - Nephrology

Evelien Snauwaert

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ghent University Hospital - Paediatric Nephrology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital - Nephrology

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UGent_UToPaed_3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Acute Kidney Injury in Neonates
NCT00572715 WITHDRAWN