Effect of Miswak and Miswak Extract on Oral Malodor

NCT ID: NCT02628938

Last Updated: 2016-05-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

212 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this experiment is to investigate the effect of Miswak on oral malodor and to determine whether this effect -if present- is the result of the mechanical action of Miswak or the chemical effect of its extract

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was designed as a randomized, parallel group clinical trial with one control and two test groups. The efficacy of each modality was evaluated by comparing the oral malodor indicators before use with those after 15 minutes (masking effect) and 7 days (therapeutic effect) of use. Three indicators for oral malodor were recorded; Organoleptic scores (OLS), Self-assessment of oral malodor, and the level of volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) measured by a breath checker device.

Ethical committee approval was obtained from the research center in Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy (FUGRP/2013/114) prior to conducting of the study.

Between March and December 2014, screening of volunteered 212 female dental students aged 18-35 years was carried out. Preliminary interview and clinical examinations were done for all volunteers to select the sample according to the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. To be included in the study, the participants should report that they suffered from bad oral malodor and also should have an organoleptic score of 2 or above. Total of 167 interviewed subjects were excluded from the study for not fulfilling the eligibility criteria and a final sample size of 45 volunteers who have satisfied the criteria were selected in the study. The objectives of the study were fully explained and an informed written consent was obtained to participate in the study.

One week before the baseline readings all the 45 participants received instructions to avoid eating spicy foods, garlic and onions 2 days prior to the assessment. All participants were instructed to maintain their current oral hygiene regime.

The included participants (N=45) were randomly divided into 3 groups. (Group ME): 15 participants were asked to rinse with 50% Miswak extract mouth wash (5ml) twice a day for 7 days. Each participant was given a determined volume of the mouth wash and a marked scoop for the prescribed dose. Compliance of the participants was checked by measuring the remaining volume in the bottle during the second visit.

(Group MS): 15 participants were taught and instructed to use Miswak stick twice a day for 7 days. Length of the Miswak stick was measured on the second visit to assess the compliance of the participants in using them.

(Group CH): 15 participants were taught and instructed to rinse with 5 ml of 0.2% Chlorohexidine gluconate mouth wash (Oraxine ®) twice a day for 7 days. Each participant was given a determined volume of the mouth wash and a marked scoop for the prescribed dose. Compliance of the participants was checked by measuring the remaining volume in the bottle during the second visit.

To prepare the Miswak extract, a group of fresh Miswak sticks were collected from the local market and chopped into very small pieces. The sticks were then allowed to dry in room temperature for 2 days before they were ground into powder. To prepare the mouth wash, 10 gm of the powder was added to 100 ml of sterile distilled water and allowed to soak for another two days at a temperature of 4°C. It was then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 2000 rpm and then filtered using 0.45 μm pore size paper. The resultant solution was further diluted by distilled water by the ratio of 1:1 and used within one week.

Measurements of oral malodor indicators:

All readings were taken early in the morning one to three hours after breakfast and tooth brushing. Measurements included the following:

* Self-assessment of mouth odor
* Organoleptic scores (OLS)
* Volatile sulfur compound

Data analysis was performed using paired t-test to compare the different indicator scores before and after the use of each method. One way ANOVA was also performed to test the significance of the difference between the three methods in reducing oral malodor. A P\<0.05 was accepted as the level of significance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oral Malodor Halitosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Miswak extract mouth wash

50% mouthwash aqueous solution 5ml twice a day for 7 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miswak extract mouth wash

Intervention Type OTHER

50% Miswak extract mouth wash (5ml) twice a day for 7 days

Miswak sticks

Sticks twice a day for 7 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miswak stick

Intervention Type OTHER

Miswak stick twice a day for 7 days

Chlorohexidine gluconate mouth wash

0.2% mouth wash aqueous solution (Oraxine ®) 5 ml twice a day for 7 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chlorohexidine gluconate

Intervention Type OTHER

5 ml of 0.2% Chlorohexidine gluconate mouth wash Oraxine ® twice a day for 7 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Miswak extract mouth wash

50% Miswak extract mouth wash (5ml) twice a day for 7 days

Intervention Type OTHER

Miswak stick

Miswak stick twice a day for 7 days

Intervention Type OTHER

Chlorohexidine gluconate

5 ml of 0.2% Chlorohexidine gluconate mouth wash Oraxine ® twice a day for 7 days

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Salvadora persica mouth wash Oraxine ®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* the participants should report that they suffered from bad oral malodor
* organoleptic score of 2 or above

Exclusion Criteria

* smoking
* current systemic diseases or medical treatment
* active caries or any faulty restorations
* acute sinusitis or oro-pharyngeal infection
* chronic periodontitis
* pregnancy
* breast feeding
* eating very spicy food
* use of antibiotic during the last two months before the start of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammad Ramadan Rayyan

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammad R Rayyan, MDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riyadh colleges of dentistry and pharmacy

Riyadh, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUGRP/2013/114

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of Breezy Candy on Halitosis
NCT00875927 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Effectiveness of Aquamin® in Mitigating Halitosis
NCT05058638 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Green Tea Lozenges for the Management of Dry Mouth
NCT01647737 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2