Caudal Block vs Local Wound Infiltration for Hernia Repair in Children

NCT ID: NCT02620566

Last Updated: 2016-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To our knowledge there is still no study comparing the local wound infiltration by itself without ilio-inguinal and ilio-hypogastric nerve block and caudal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate anesthesia and recovery profile in pediatric patients after inguinal hernia repair with caudal block (CB) or local wound infiltration (LWI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total of 80 children aged 6 month to 7 years of ASA physical status I or II, undergoing unilateral hernia repair will be enroled in the study. One group will receive caudal block (CB) and the other group will receive local wound infiltration (LWI).

Group CB will receive 1ml kg 0,25% bupivacaine and group LWI will receive 0,2 ml kg 0,25% bupivacaine. Data taken will than be analyzed and interpreted. Postoperative pain will be assess using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS, 0-10)(8) and the Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0-10)(9) at 30 min and 1, 2, and 3 h after operation. The time to first supplemental oral acetaminophen demand (first acetaminophen time) was defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first registration of more than 4 on both CHEOPS and FLACC by the investigator. Twenty-four hours after surgery, reports of delayed side-effects and demands for rescue acetaminophen from the child will be gathered. The investigator, who will be blind to the treatment group, will document these data with the medical records.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacain -Caudal

Single shot Caudal Block will receive Group C with 1ml per kg Bupivacain 0,25%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacain- Caudal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacain for caudal blocks, Group C received 1 ml kg of 0.25% (maximum volume 20 ml).

Bupivacain- Local

Single shot Local Infiltration will receive Group L with 0,2ml per kg Bupivacain 0,25%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine- Local

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacain for Local Wound Infiltration Group L received 0,2 ml kg 0,25% (maximum volume 4 ml).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacain- Caudal

Bupivacain for caudal blocks, Group C received 1 ml kg of 0.25% (maximum volume 20 ml).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacaine- Local

Bupivacain for Local Wound Infiltration Group L received 0,2 ml kg 0,25% (maximum volume 4 ml).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Caudal block Local Wound Infiltration

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 6 month to 7 years
* ASA physical status I or II
* undergoing unilateral hernia repair

Exclusion Criteria

* history of developmental delay or mental retardation
* type I diabetes
* known or suspected coagulopathy
* known allergy to any local anesthetic
* known congenital anomaly of the spine
* signs of spinal anomaly or infection at the sacral or inguinal region
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Clinic for Anesthesia Reanimation and Intensive Care Mother Theresa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov MD Msc.

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov, MD. Msc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mother Theresa University Clinical Center Skopje Macedonia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uctoariced

Skopje, , North Macedonia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

North Macedonia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UCTOARICED1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of Mesh Fixation With Tissue Adhesive
NCT05934266 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4