Non-inferiority Trial of Conditional vs Universal Follow up for Children With Fever in Democratic Republic of Congo

NCT ID: NCT02595827

Last Updated: 2017-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

4451 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-09

Study Completion Date

2016-12-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Providers in integrated Community Case Management (iCCM) programs in low resource settings often see children without any danger signs, presenting with fever but not having pneumonia, malaria, or diarrhea. These children are sent home (often with analgesic only), and caretakers are advised to return in 2 or 3 days. In this study, we are evaluating if conditional return advice (i.e. return in 2 or 3 day only if your child is still sick") results in the same proportion of children remaining with fever one week after identification, as the current universal return advice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fevers in childhood are common and usually self resolve. In rural Democratic Republic of Congo (and many other settings), when a febrile child presents to a community health worker (CHW), the child is assessed for malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhea, and other danger signs, according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for integrated Community Case Management (iCCM) of childhood illnesses. In the cases where 1) there are no danger signs present, and 2) malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhea have been ruled out, the CHW provides an antipyretic only, sends the child home, and advises all such cases to come back in 3 days. We hypothesize, however, that health outcomes for these cases will be equivalent if the CHW advises to come back in 3 days, only if symptoms have not resolved.

To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a cluster-randomized, community-based non-inferiority trial in two zones of Kalemie, Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. In this area, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) has been supporting the training, scale-up, and rollout of community health workers who conduct iCCM as per WHO guidelines and with Ministry of Health oversight. CHWs have unique non-overlapping catchment areas, and groups of CHWs (average 5-7) are associated with health clinics. We will utilize this group structure as the unit of randomization; health clinics (and thereby, groups of CHWs) will be randomly allocated to one of two groups in terms of the advice given to caretakers of children who have no danger signs, have neither malaria, pneumonia, nor diarrhea, and are thus classified as having fever of non-identified origin.

* Group 1 (Universal follow-up): CHWs in this group will advise caretakers to follow up in 3 days
* Group 2 (Conditional follow-up): CHWs in this group will advise caretakers to follow up in 3 days if symptoms/signs remain the same (or worsen).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fever

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Universal

In this group, caretakers of children will receive the standard advice under current iCCM guidelines in DRC. Specifically, the CHW will advise that the child come back in 2-3 days.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Conditional

In this Conditional Advice group, caretakers will be given advice that is modified from the current iCCM guidelines. Specifically, the CHW will advise that the child come back in 2-3 days if the child's symptoms continue.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conditional Advice

Intervention Type OTHER

Caretakers are told to return in 2-3 only (Conditional Advice) if the child's symptoms continue.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conditional Advice

Caretakers are told to return in 2-3 only (Conditional Advice) if the child's symptoms continue.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Agree to recruitment script provided by CHWs at the time of identification of eligible

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

International Rescue Committee

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Research Co, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luke C Mullany, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

International Rescue Committee, Kalemie Office

Kalemie, Katanga, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mullany LC, van Boetzelaer EW, Gutman JR, Steinhardt LC, Ngoy P, Barbera Lainez Y, Wittcoff A, Harvey SA, Ho LS. Universal versus conditional day 3 follow-up for children with non-severe unclassified fever at the community level in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A cluster-randomized, community-based non-inferiority trial. PLoS Med. 2018 Apr 17;15(4):e1002552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002552. eCollection 2018 Apr.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29664951 (View on PubMed)

van Boetzelaer E, Ho LS, Gutman JR, Steinhardt LC, Wittcoff A, Barbera Y, Ngoy P, Harvey SA, Mullany LC. Universal versus conditional three-day follow up visit for children with uncomplicated fever at the community level: design of a cluster-randomized, community-based, non-inferiority trial in Tanganyika, Democratic Republic of Congo. BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0792-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28122542 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

68295

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Febrile Illness in Guinea
NCT06122259 RECRUITING
Home Management of Malaria and Pneumonia
NCT02151578 COMPLETED PHASE4